deport him
Let them stay in all the crapistans around the world.
You don’t let them into your country until their track record of the last hundred years proves them to have changed their behavior.
Islam is incompatible with our way of life and governing. All muslims are taught to hate us, lie to us and harm or kill us.
I don’t invite people into my home who wish me harm and I don’t want my gov’t to invite them into out country.
Ban them all.
Answer to the NYT: By keeping people who think that way out of the freaking country you freaks!
Sets a precedent to place us under surveillance for our thoughts of abolishing this regime and restoring a constitutional government.
But WE belong here. They don’t.
I asked this very same question to a left leaning acquaintance yesterday. The answer is fairly obvious, and has already been said on this thread several times, but he just couldn’t bring himself to say it. PC kills.
Maybe Choban Yogurt can supply a free kiddie rape kit cup inside each six pack of yogurt they sell?
Maybe the commission cut for Valerie Jarret brokering tens of billions in cash to Tehran could explain a little?
Maybe the global government elites can tell us that Islamists are clean skins when they arrive with no prior records and are as such the perfect untraceable killing machine with unfettered access?
Maybe they are the perfect catalyst to strip away all individual liberties and rights from the public in promise for protection from the same?
And now ersatz Attorny General Lynch admits the DOJ has lost track of Omar's wife who said she knew about the massacre plans and may have access to his bank account, as well as tickets and jewelry (which can be easily hocked for cash) Omar purchased shortly before the massacre.
It's not whether there was more evidence than a thought about Omar's terrorism, but whether there is more evidence than a thought about the DOJ's complicity, before or after, in the terrorist murders.
Why do we PROSECUTE people for what they THINK?
This very notion is the motivation behind the idea of “hate crimes”.
Motivation may be used as EVIDENCE for action, but should not be a prosecutable offense.
Strange the NYT doesn’t have any problem with thoughtcrime when it comes to not wanting persons of the opposite sex using bathrooms, opposition to gay marriage or anything else deemed politically incorrect
Why don’t we start by trying to stop the ones who have revealed their intentions by multiple speeches and actions ... such as the late Mr. Mateen who was reported to the FBI multiple times?
If enough of those are shot/locked up/deported before they can do any harm, then many of those who are just “thinking” will start thinking it’s not worth it.
Easy. Deport all Muslims, close all mosques.
First, establish a short checklist.
Is the "person of interest" muslim? Yes/No
Has the "person of interest" expressed a public interest in committing acts of terror or otherwise doing harm to innocents? Yes/No
Depending on the results, remove the "person of interest" from the ability to carry out his evil plans. Quietly. How that happens, or by whom, doesn't matter much, as long as they don't find the body. Repeat as necessary until the problem resolves itself by migration back to whatever middle easter piss-hole from which they crawled.
Remember all the muslims that fled the US after 9/11?
If someone joins a club that tells everybody who joins it to terrorize and kill people outside the club until everybody is forced to submit to the club, and has a rule that people that try to quit the club are to be killed, and people that question the wisdom of the club are to be killed, and that people that merely pretend to be loyal to the club and are not utterly and truly committed are to be killed...if that person wants to immigrate to your country without renouncing the principles of his club in favor of decent civilized behavior, and you let him in, and he kills people....do not blame yourself for endangering lives of innocent people. Instead work your hardest to disarm the innocent people and to import more people from the club.
How Do You Stop a Future Terrorist When the Only Evidence Is a Thought?
It just depends on how serious you are about stopping terrorism.
Don’t let them in to your country in the first place. There should be no more of place for Islam in the West than there is for worshipers of the Aztec pantheon.
the answer is profiling.
only the infantile thinkers on the left consider this an inhuman tactic in the war on terror.
it is the only rational way to protect the citizens from threats hiding amongst them.
who in their right mind at that secrurity company thought it was a good idea to hire and arm a muslim immigrant from afghanistan who had a history of making jihad friendly comments all the way back to 9/11?
he should have been profiled right out of that job. and the FBI who dropped the ball when they REPEATEDLY investigated him, bears partial responsibility for what happened.
How do you stop...? You don’t obviously. Instead you disarm his victims and give him free reign. Fundamental transformation.