Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton IT specialist invokes 5th more than 125 times in deposition
FOX ^

Posted on 06/22/2016 11:27:56 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Clinton IT specialist invokes 5th more than 125 times in deposition | Fox News Catherine Herridge,

Hillary Clinton IT specialist Bryan Pagliano invoked the Fifth more than 125 times during a 90-minute, closed-door deposition Wednesday with the conservative watchdog Judicial Watch, a source with the group told Fox News.

The official said Pagliano was working off an index card and read the same crafted statement each time.

“It was a sad day for government transparency,” the Judicial Watch official said, adding they asked all their questions and Pagliano invoked the Fifth Amendment right not to answer them.

Pagliano was a central figure in the set-up and management of Clinton’s personal server she used exclusively for government business while secretary of state. The State Department inspector general found Clinton violated government rules with that arrangement.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; clinton; election2016; jwdeposition; newyork; pagliano; slimebagpagliano; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: Bulwinkle
Hillary's Testimony: I don't recall. I depended on the IT guy. So, ask him.
61 posted on 06/22/2016 1:17:51 PM PDT by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Hillary Clinton IT specialist Bryan Pagliano invoked the Fifth more than 125 times

obviously he has a deep seated fear of committing Arkancide, as do most, I'm sure, who serve the Clinton crime family

62 posted on 06/22/2016 1:18:56 PM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chewbarkah

I honestly remember that in publication. In fact, it was $36,000 ? The check was from an alter ego “LLC”. Something like Clinton enterprises LLC. I’m sure the “foundation” was the LLC manager. Just a total scam. Im sorry I cant give you the citation. Its out there big time.


63 posted on 06/22/2016 1:20:43 PM PDT by WENDLE (Ban Wahhabis . Not guns!! Profile them!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
It's how F. Lee Bailey got O.J. off. Got Mark Fuhrman to start taking the fifth, and finished his line of questioning with "Did you plant any evidence in the Simpson case?"

That wasn't F. Lee. It was Gerald Uelmen. Watch him make the weasel squirm (1m4s).

The OJ trial did produce a conviction, just not of OJ.

64 posted on 06/22/2016 1:26:00 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: The Continental Op

Hillary turned over the emails a year and half ago. She deleted over 30,000 emails, sent and received classified emails, removed classified markings, used the SOS email system for her foundation, solicited governments for foundation, etc... etc... FBI has been mute for over a year an a half. And you call the investigation energetic?


65 posted on 06/22/2016 1:26:08 PM PDT by BushCountry (Studies show that one out of three Liberals are as stupid as the other two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: BushCountry

I do. i, believe the investigation has been made quite difficult due to the need to forensically retrieve the 30,000 scrubbed emails you refer to, and by stonewalling by the state dept and others. Further, I believe the investigation has been taken in directions other than the server. You apparently disagree. I’m not here to argue with you, and I don’t really care what conclusion you reach. If my conclusion irks you, by all means ignore it.


66 posted on 06/22/2016 1:32:13 PM PDT by The Continental Op
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Chewbarkah

Initially, it was a down payment of $5000 up front but that is before she took office. What is even more disgusting is she stuck him in the State Department as a GS 15 and used taxpayer money to pay him approx 140K a year while he was working illegally at her house? I understand from judicial watch that the server anti virus was shut off making is easily hacked. Of course it was hacked . That is probably why he took the 5th amendment over 1 hundred times which I do not understand since he has immunity from prosecution. ? What is that about?


67 posted on 06/22/2016 1:33:11 PM PDT by WENDLE (Ban Wahhabis . Not guns!! Profile them!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

The “weasels” were those who turned a murder case into a race case and duped a bunch of jurors with chips on their shoulders, not the LAPD officer you refer to.


68 posted on 06/22/2016 1:35:24 PM PDT by The Continental Op
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

True, but one never wants to be on the wrong side of the Clintons. The health implications alone would cause one to plead the 5th.


69 posted on 06/22/2016 1:38:35 PM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: The Continental Op

Does not irk me one bit. And I been leaning in your direction for the longest time. I have recently lost faith. There have been too many laws broken with no action. I can not understand if she is guilty of dozens of crimes (which I whole heartily believe), why silence, why let her run for president, why not indict and still look for more wrong doing. You can arrest someone and still conduct a criminal investigation for more crimes. Everything does not have to be wrapped up in a neat little ball. At this moment, there is enough evidence to put her away for the rest of her life.


70 posted on 06/22/2016 1:39:18 PM PDT by BushCountry (Studies show that one out of three Liberals are as stupid as the other two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: BushCountry

BTW, as I recall even the way they “turned them over” was meant to delay and obfuscate. They printed them out and delivered them, didn’t even deliver them digitally. All then had to be scanned by hand in order to cross-correlate, etc. That takes months.
http://money.cnn.com/2015/03/11/technology/security/hillary-email-paper/


71 posted on 06/22/2016 1:41:36 PM PDT by The Continental Op
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: The Continental Op

Another instance where it made no sense. They turned over the paper records and electronically deleted the files. They got to decide what to keep and what to delete (without proper security clearances) If this is not against the law, it should be. They incorrectly stored the deleted classified files on a USB (laws broken the first week, laws broken not handing over emails when exiting State).

And the fact that it slowed down the process by months is mind boggling (I know I read that it did), but am IT. Optical Recognition Technology and proper scripting (text conversion program) could have made a searchable database in a week.


72 posted on 06/22/2016 1:54:37 PM PDT by BushCountry (Studies show that one out of three Liberals are as stupid as the other two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
The point...her criminality is about to be projected nationwide, spilled into every household in America. Her poll numbers will drop.

I cannot wait till September for the 1st debate between Hillary and Trump. This will be very entertaining.

Do I feel she'll be indicted...nope, but I hope so. I do however feel her baggage is about to catch up to her.

73 posted on 06/22/2016 1:57:21 PM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BushCountry

It’s even worse—they allowed her bevy of lawyers to decide which were “private” and which “public”. This is yet another way to stonewall, and throw another level of insulation between the crook and the jail. For, questioning her lawyers will raise bogus attorney-client privilege claims and so forth. They are accomplished liars, accomplished crooks and learned the first time around how to block investigations.

Another thing has surfaced—in one of the recent depositions in the JW case, Mills testified that (paraphrasing) “Hllary wanted to do it like she’s done it in the Senate, using private email rather than a government email address.”
So, the state dept. email situation is just one part of this. No one has yet, to my knowledge, investigated how she handled her Senate emails. I do not know whether the had a private server there or not, but I would be my right arm she never turned over anything to archivists upon departing the senate. I imagine those all went “bye bye”.


74 posted on 06/22/2016 2:03:19 PM PDT by The Continental Op
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: timestax
 photo 49386f09-d43b-4954-8296-e140e1746f0f_zpsl0jogsdu.jpg
75 posted on 06/22/2016 2:29:13 PM PDT by timestax (American Media = Domestic Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519
125 times in 90 minutes. In other words, he read his 5th amendment script every 43 seconds. It took how long each time? 5-10 seconds. That means very likely he answered nothing, not a single thing. His immunity should be yanked as it likely calls for cooperation, even if not to Judicial Watch.

I agree, yank his immunity and charge him with the crime of setting up the server illegally and make him defend his actions.

76 posted on 06/22/2016 3:27:39 PM PDT by Cyclone59 (Where are we going, and what's with the handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

This guy must have gotten one helluva big check from the grifters.


77 posted on 06/22/2016 3:36:39 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (Fear is the mind killer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyclone59

Pagliano is a afraid of the big Islamic fish at the top!


78 posted on 06/22/2016 4:20:40 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Females DESTROYED America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I can’t wait to see Clinton taking the 5th, over and over again.


79 posted on 06/22/2016 4:25:38 PM PDT by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
"I don't like the 2nd Amendment, but I sure do like the 5th."

(pic source: Thegatewaypundit.com)

80 posted on 06/22/2016 5:28:03 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson