Posted on 06/12/2016 3:12:43 PM PDT by PROCON
Democratic Presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton is calling for an assault weapons ban, presumably just like the one her husband instituted in the 1990s, in reaction to the Orlando shooting.
In a just-issued statement, she said:
"Finally, we need to keep guns like the ones used last night out of the hands of terrorists or other violent criminals. This is the deadliest mass shooting in the history of the United States and it reminds us once more that weapons of war have no place on our streets."
The rifle used in the shooting was an AR-15 type, a semi-automatic weapon that be equipped with magazines that hold several bullets. Since the first Clinton ban died under former President George W. Bush, it has become the most popular style of weapon made and sold and a favorite on gun ranges across America.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
She doesn't have a clue. Any black, scary looking long gun is a weapon of war to a liberal.
Insane
The lying hags answer to all.
... and it reminds us once more that weapons of war have no place on our streets....
King George IIII said exactly the same thing before he sent his Redcoats to seize the Colonists’ guns and ammunition at Lexington.
Never forget that he paid the price all the way to Yorktown.
See?
He was able to PASS his background check for his AR-15 last week IN SPITE of being investigated by the FBI not once but TWO times..!
And THERE is where it is like the actual goals of Fast & Furious:
Bloody mass-murder headlines that would build public support for repealing gun ownership.
It is scary but POSSIBLE that our betters WELCOME the Florida Fifty.
THEY WELCOME IT.
Gee, what about Fast and Furious? You liked guns then, especially in the hands of the enemy..
Ban Muslims.
Ban knives, swords, axes, fire, water and anything else Islam uses to kill people. That will stop ‘em - right?
Beat me by 10 seconds!
What good are insta-check if they do not stop someone who traveled to Afghanistan for weapons training WITH JIHADIS...???
If they couldn’t stop HIM, so egregious a case, then WHO exactly would the checks stop..?
THE GUMMINT SUPPORTS THE CHECKS BECAUSE THEIR ACTUAL GOAL IS A SYSTEM OF DE-FACTO **GUN REGISTRATION**.
Baning guns in response to Muslims shooting at us would be like banning airlines after 9/11 or banning aircraft carriers after Pearl Harbor.
“Great minds...”
u know the rest.
Better ban planes while she is at it. She maybe forgot that they stole a few and killed 3000 people with them. Were they assault planes?
Common sense gun laws: putting defenseless citizens at the mercy of armed criminals and terrorists.
No, Hillary, the Constitution affords us the right to protect ourselves from the murdering muslim bastards that you and your damned party are importing.
We will keep our guns, and we will band muslims, and send you with them.
To Hell with you, Hillary.
... THEIR ACTUAL GOAL IS A SYSTEM OF DE-FACTO **GUN REGISTRATION**....
There is absolutely nothing DEFACTO about their plans for
US firearms and their control or seizure.
Oh Hillary!, you ignorant slut!
I guess she stands for the proposition that security guards should be disarmed, because this radical Islamic Terrorist DEMOCRAT had a valid license to carry by virtue of his job.
(Of course the words “radical Islamic Terrorist Democrat” are missing from Hillary’s! tired DNC talking points).
She is clueless enough not to know how this statement will come back to haunt her soon.
I think we're going to see a bump in the national polls for Trump and his bold statement this morning.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.