Posted on 06/09/2016 6:15:25 AM PDT by detective
Understand the scope of this story and you understand the reason why the entirety of the progressive left has been harping on the Trump University story. They are desperate to keep eyes and attention from the San Jose violence and the city officials who factually facilitated and organized it. Of course the insufferable GOPe and ‘Conservative Punditry’ are stupid enough not to see that.
Newly released arrest reports, from one of the only charges filed so far in the San Jose mob attacks against Donald Trump supporters, contain some harrowing accounts written by under cover police officers who witnessed the onslaught.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
“If the KKK advocated what La Raza does, the AG and FBI would arrest every leader and disarm the members.”
Ah.
So if it was a true story before the plagiarism.. what then is the point of re-writing it and sticking it on a blog?
That slogan on your T-Shirt, a can of mace in your hand, flanked by some BIG friends, and attend the next Trump appearance.
You love to stir the s*** donchya.... lol
From the still shots I have seen the attendees are run through a metal detector probably since Trump has SS protection.
Yep. Crispy, burnt toast.
Source material like written eyewitness accounts and cell phone videos speak for themselves regardless of where they appear.
Claiming that such source material is invalid because it gets used in a blog is not logical and in this particular instance really dumb.
Wear that crown lightly TG.
Yep, even if stolen. Got it.
Time these so-called non-profits opened their books.
So police officers in San Jose if you see the law being violated, to the point of violent physical attacks and your orders are to do nothing you are telling me you are willing to obey a clearly illegal, unethical and immoral order rather than do your sworn duty?
Tells me how quite a bit how many officers might respond to an illegal order to begin kicking in doors and “trying” to confiscate firearms from so-called “citizens” with clearly established Constitutional Rights.
*
**
Posted by Grampa Dave:
Cesar Chavez vs. La Raza
By Mark Krikorian, October 16, 2009
When I wrote a few months ago about the origins of “la raza” as a racial-supremacist concept (developed in the ‘20s and ‘30s on the idea of the biological superiority of mestizos), Janet Murguia, head of the National Council of La Raza, pointed and sputtered over at the Huffington Post.
Well, while reading a memoir/history of the immigration reform movement by retired historian Otis Graham (who’s on CIS’s board), I find out that even Cesar Chavez rejected the “la raza” idea as inherently racist. Graham quoted a 1969 New Yorker profile by Peter Matthiessen:
“I hear more and more Mexicans talking about la raza—to build up their pride, you know,” Chavez told me. “Some people don’t look at it as racism, but when you say ‘la raza,’ you are saying an anti-gringo thing, and it won’t stop there. Today it’s anti-gringo, tomorrow it will be anti-Negro, and the day after it will be anti-Filipino, anti-Puerto Rican. And then it will be anti-poor-Mexican, and anti-darker-skinned Mexican. ... La raza is a very dangerous concept. I speak very strongly against it among the chicanos.”
And in Sal Si Puedes: Cesar Chavez and the New American Revolution, his 1970 biography, Matthiessen talked to Chavez deputy Leroy Chatfield:
“That’s one of the reasons he is so upset about la raza. The same Mexicans that ten years ago were talking about themselves as Spaniards are coming on real strong these days as Mexicans.
Everyone should be proud of what they are, of course, but race is only skin-deep. It’s phony and it comes out of frustration; the la raza people are not secure.
They look upon Cesar as their ‘dumb Mexican’ leader; he’s become their saint. But he doesn’t want any part of it. He said to me just the other day, ‘Can’t they understand that that’s just the way Hitler started?’
A few months ago the Ford Foundation funded a la razagroup and Cesar really told them off. The foundation liked the outfit’s sense of pride or something, and Cesar tried to explain to them what the origin of the word was, that it’s related to Hitler’s concept.”
In 1968, the Ford Foundation started the Southwest Council of La Raza, presumably the “outfit” Chatfield was referring to, which five years later changed its name to the National Council of La Raza.
I am an aging White American. I am not ******** in my pants in fear. Should the Professor wish to test me, I do have a number of guns. They are all loaded and ready to go. I have both the ability and will power to use them when it becomes necessary. So my question to him would be,”What are you waiting on?” He is protected by the Government Agencies , including the police as evidenced in California and New Mexico. We, on the other hand, are on our own. We have no one but each other. This [United States of America] is the New Germany and we are the New Jews.
Ah, here we are again with the Ford Foundation at the root of another evil.
Thanks for the ping to this great thread, LucyT.
(read it all) BTTT!
Can’t be-—even Freepers who “get it” think being a minority in the new Amerika is gonna be just peachy.
La Raza = Fascism. Mexican Nationalist Socialists.
Good Read:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.