Posted on 06/06/2016 4:56:40 AM PDT by expat_panama
A gold standard prevents an excessive growth of the money supply and the resulting devaluation of the dollar.
“I thought we were supposed to blame Nixon for taking us off the gold standard. Who to blame?”
It was Nixon. 15 August 1971.
What FDR was revalue gold from $20/oz to $35 in order to increase the monetary base. And prohibit private ownership but it didn’t end the gold standard.
I am all in favor of an “expanded” gold standard, that could be called a “precious metals” standard.
Gold is lovely stuff, but there just isn’t enough of it, which makes it both a volatile and fragile market. However, if you combine other precious metals in the same monetary regime as gold, you get lots of added value.
While each metal still floats in its own market, their interchangeability with each other stabilizes all of them. For example, say the price of Rhodium suddenly skyrockets. You can take advantage of that jump by selling your Rhodium and buy more stable Palladium. That is, you are much less hesitant to profit-take
If you think about it, you could even include valuable metals like various kinds of stainless kept in good condition after processing.
America also has boucoup copper, silver, and aluminum. And last but not least, having all this metal as currency makes it the equivalent of a strategic reserve.
It is my understanding based on one of Ayn Rand’s books that Britain tried to remain on the gold standard after WW1.
To help the Brits, America adopted a low interest rate policy.
The low interest rates of the 1920’s produced a tremendous boom. The introduction of massive consumer credit availability, cars, radio and electrical appliances also helped make America boom.
Booms are always created by busts. Why?
Prices get too high during booms. People stop buying because they are priced out or realize the prices are unreasonable. Then construction and production workers lose jobs - this make boom prices seem and be even more absurd.
Things get restored by corrections. Stock markets adjust within about twelve months. Real estate markets can take years or even a decade to adjust.
There is also a product durability factor. The new cars and radios bought in the 1920’s continued to function in the 1930’s and through WW2.
[The car manufacturers in the 1970’s thought they found a way around the product durability factor. Honda and Toyota taught the US carmakers a lesson by 1980.]
A new generation after WW2 was ready to buy cars and houses for itself, so the civilian economy recovered.
The way to manage an economy is to pull the interest rate punch bowl away as soon as the party gets into the swing.
He never had sex with her. He was too busy drilling little boys.
In addition to media putting the sheople to sleep, there is also the drugs that amazingly end up in small towns.
A gold standard isn’t really possible in a world with seven billion people.
As a money holder, what I look for is bank interest rates that exceed in-store inflation.
If the local banks pay ~1% or less on CDs and grocery stores raise their prices by about 5% a year, the money stinks.
If there is a real chance an Obama or Hillary can stay in office for eight years, I’ll not trust the money.
Anybody who buys a 10-year 1.79% bond is a fool. At no time in my life did prices rise by less than 1.79% over a ten-year period. And that doesn’t factor in the harmful impact of taxation on the interest paid.
Not sure whats true or not in the following article but pins some other presidential assassinations to the same cause
http://humansarefree.com/2013/11/jfk-killed-after-shutting-down.html?m=0
Not a particular interest of mine but here’s an article for those who are
Of course you wouldn't want to hold your breath on
that.
It used to be that way 25 years ago back when banks needed money (and even that was an aberration), but for the most part since then banks were just not a place to put your money for the sake of earnings.
These days folks we run into who expect to create wealth with their bank deposits are poor sots who haven't a clue how to handle money.
--or FDR depending on your politics and gold preference, the entire process took a long time from '14 to '72 with the biggest jumps in '33 and '72. This writer's notion that FDR put us on the gold standard was a new one for me. Sounds like something from Orwell's 'Ministry of Truth'.
Correct, succinct explanations in posts 21 & 22. Thank you.
It’s been done before under bimetallism, with silver and gold being monetized.
That just complicates things and creates arbitrage issues. A basket of metals would be even more difficult. You don’t really need a lot of underlying specie to make the gold standard work, you just have to peg the dollar to it at some set price.
There was very little gold in the Treasury when Alexander Hamilton pegged the dollar to gold. As long as you guarantee convertibility it stabilizes and anchors your money.
“It is my understanding based on one of Ayn Rand’s books that Britain tried to remain on the gold standard after WW1.”
Britain attempted to return the Pound to “parity”, it’s pre-War price in gold. This was deflationary. They would have been wiser to peg it to it’s lower current market valuation instead.
“Booms are always created by busts. Why?”
Austrian School theory is because the booms are the result of artificially low short term interest rates that spawn them. I think I’d go with more of a Real Business Cycle theory explanation which I suppose could include the Austrian School explanation.
“A gold standard isn’t really possible in a world with seven billion people.”
Yeah it is. You aren’t backing your entire money supply with gold. A large portion of the money supply under the gold standard was always “bank money” aka “credit money”. A gold standard just sets a peg at which the dollar is valued making excessive creation of new money impossible. You don’t get the constant erosion of the value of the dollar that we experienced after Nixon closed the gold window.
” but pins some other presidential assassinations to the same cause”
Pure kook conspiracy nonsense. US Notes were nothing more than Lincoln’s Greenback issue carried forward on the books of the Treasury and the Bureau of Printing and Engraving.
There used to be a valid distinction between Silver Certificates and US Notes, US Notes being entirely fiat. When American minor coinage had the silver removed and Silver Certs were called in the distinction between Silver Certs, US Notes and Federal Reserve Notes became moot.
And this decision was made by Congress and the President, not the Federal Reserve who had no such authority.
FDR changed the nature of the gold standard rather than ending it. The public could no longer exchange dollars for gold but governments could.
The distinction is often made as one of the Gold Standard before FDR, the Gold Exchange Standard after 1933.
All of it ended with Nixon in 1971. But that came after a long period of monetary policy trouble due to a phenomenon known as the Triffin Dilemma which began with Eisenhower’s Presidency. We needed to cut the dollar loose from being the world’s reserve currency.
Glad to be of assistance
That’s pretty much my understanding too. Along w/ that the Fed came into its own w/ the FOMC and the lessons it learned about money supply in ‘29.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.