Posted on 06/05/2016 9:52:24 AM PDT by detective
Sunday on ABCs This Week, Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton refused to say conclusively the Second Amendment is a constitutional right and that it is subject to reasonable regulations.
Partial transcript as follows:
STEPHANOPOULOS: Lets talk about the Second Amendment. As you know Donald Trump has been out on the stump talking about the Second Amendment saying you want to abolish the Second Amendment. I know you reject that but a specific question, do you believe an individuals right to bear arms is a Constitutional right, that its not linked to service in a militia?
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
What a stupid set up.
I didn’t see the interview./ But what I think is stupid, is that her pal Stephanoplous, who is still a loyal Clintonista, is interviewing her . I can imagine it was a powder puff interview.
I believe it is my natural right of self-preservation, if ever, a moronic, gender-confused idiot attacks me while I am attending to my ostomy appliance!
I’ve survived ‘one of those uncles’, a tornado or two, three years in Southeast Asia, the original swine flu outbreak, cancer, and Hurricane Katrina. I’ll be (expletive) if some gender-confused moron is going to attempt to cancel my E-ride ticket!!
He should have asked her what “Shall Not Be Infringed” means.
Ten to One it would have caused a coughing fit.
Off topic, but why is Huma with Hillary all the time???]
Why isn’t Huma at home more, taking care of her son???
Is her devotion to Hillary that intense, that complete, that she thinks nothing of neglecting her own family, that Hillary takes priority over her son????
The BITCH said that over 90% of all Americans believe EXACTLY AS SHE DOES!!!!!!!!!!
Now, is there any chance in hell that Trump might be in error calling her “Lying Hillary”?
How many idiots are in America? Must be a bunch!
Exactly right. Any discuss of gun control should automatically lump in restrictions of the media.
Freedom of the Press must be curtailed, and the only question is what sort of reasonable restrictions (coming from ... let’s say: Donald Trump) would the media find tolerable? Is their answer “none”? Very well, then we shall also have no restrictions on the right to bear arms.
>>that its not linked to service in a militia?
Idiots. There’s no such thing as “service in a militia” right up to the point where the militia is called out to fight.
Which is what will be required of us when Trump wins and the Progs order their cannon fodder to destroy everything.
Clinton: “If it is a Constitutional right...”
If? If it is not, then we cannot depend on the Constitution to define our Constitutional rights.
Huma: "You know these things that happen in your life that just stick? She walked by and she shook my hand and our eyes connected and I just remember having this moment where I thought; "Wow, this is amazing,"..."And it just inspired me. You know, I still remember the look on her face. And its funny, and she would probably be so annoyed that I say this, but I remember thinking; "Oh my God, shes so beautiful and shes so little!"
Huma on Hillary's emails: "Its something I cant really think about, but I cant even imagine whats in those emails. I would probably be mortified. I have no idea. I havent read any of them."
Huma and Hitlery are lesbians.
There is nothing about hillary that is little.
Not her mouth, her ass nor her ego.
She said 90% agree with her???
Really????
I’m not a gambler, but, would gladly take a bet, that Hillary does not get 90% of the vote in the election. Geezzzzz...
As my position here is well known (based on the fights I have had here), you may have a point. Hillary will wipe her derriere with the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
How difficult is it to understand. It’s a right of “the people” and it shall not be “infringed”.
I saw her on This Week this morning. What a vile human being! She actually appeared to be a little put out by Sephanopoulos. She kept saying over and over, regulation of firearms and the most people in the U.S. would agree with it.
Bottomline is that she would remove our guns.
I often wondered why he would contribute $75K to the Clinton Foundation and how he could afford it.
Then I found out he's under a $108 million contract with ABC........
She would TRY.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Does not the word “militia” also means “law-abiding” folks who keep and bear arms?
Thank-you for your response.
that’s different, abortion and sodomy are not in the text of the constitution therefore by liberal logic they are individual rights... but there is no right to firearms ownership, even though it is right there in amendment #2
I just have to wonder, why is Hillary fudging on this... I wouldn’t believe it for a second if she said Amendment #2 is an individual right, but it is politically stupi to try and fudge this.
Evidently shrillary doesn’t know how to read the Supreme Court Heller decision, that said the 2nd amendment is an individual right.
That decision then means “the mitia” in the 2nd Amendment is “the people”, not just the State Guard.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.