Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Watch: Hillary Refuses Say Right to Bear Arms Is a ‘Constitutional Right’
Breitbart ^ | 5 Jun 2016 | Pam Key

Posted on 06/05/2016 9:52:24 AM PDT by detective

Sunday on ABC’s “This Week,” Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton refused to say conclusively the Second Amendment is a constitutional right and that it “is subject to reasonable regulations.”

Partial transcript as follows:

STEPHANOPOULOS: Let’s talk about the Second Amendment. As you know Donald Trump has been out on the stump talking about the Second Amendment saying you want to abolish the Second Amendment. I know you reject that but a specific question, do you believe an individual’s right to bear arms is a Constitutional right, that it’s not linked to service in a militia?

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; bonnieschaefer; clinton; guncontrol; guns; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: detective

What a stupid set up.

I didn’t see the interview./ But what I think is stupid, is that her pal Stephanoplous, who is still a loyal Clintonista, is interviewing her . I can imagine it was a powder puff interview.


21 posted on 06/05/2016 10:12:39 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

I believe it is my natural right of self-preservation, if ever, a moronic, gender-confused idiot attacks me while I am attending to my ostomy appliance!

I’ve survived ‘one of those uncles’, a tornado or two, three years in Southeast Asia, the original swine flu outbreak, cancer, and Hurricane Katrina. I’ll be (expletive) if some gender-confused moron is going to attempt to cancel my E-ride ticket!!


22 posted on 06/05/2016 10:13:03 AM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

He should have asked her what “Shall Not Be Infringed” means.

Ten to One it would have caused a coughing fit.


23 posted on 06/05/2016 10:13:17 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Anyone catch the There is nothing Democratic about the Democrat Party. (Or the GOPe))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Off topic, but why is Huma with Hillary all the time???]

Why isn’t Huma at home more, taking care of her son???

Is her devotion to Hillary that intense, that complete, that she thinks nothing of neglecting her own family, that Hillary takes priority over her son????


24 posted on 06/05/2016 10:14:02 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: detective

The BITCH said that over 90% of all Americans believe EXACTLY AS SHE DOES!!!!!!!!!!

Now, is there any chance in hell that Trump might be in error calling her “Lying Hillary”?

How many idiots are in America? Must be a bunch!


25 posted on 06/05/2016 10:17:45 AM PDT by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

Exactly right. Any discuss of gun control should automatically lump in restrictions of the media.

Freedom of the Press must be curtailed, and the only question is what sort of reasonable restrictions (coming from ... let’s say: Donald Trump) would the media find tolerable? Is their answer “none”? Very well, then we shall also have no restrictions on the right to bear arms.


26 posted on 06/05/2016 10:18:07 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Nation States seem to be ending. The follow-on should not be Globalism, but Localism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: detective

>>that it’s not linked to service in a militia?

Idiots. There’s no such thing as “service in a militia” right up to the point where the militia is called out to fight.

Which is what will be required of us when Trump wins and the Progs order their cannon fodder to destroy everything.


27 posted on 06/05/2016 10:18:29 AM PDT by Bryanw92 (If we had some ham, we could have ham and eggs, if we had some eggs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Clinton: “If it is a Constitutional right...”

If? If it is not, then we cannot depend on the Constitution to define our Constitutional rights.


28 posted on 06/05/2016 10:19:12 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Huma and Hillary are lovers. I'm sure the FBI knows this now, having read some emails we will never see. Remember that Drudge headline and Huma quotes?:

Huma: "You know these things that happen in your life that just stick? She walked by and she shook my hand and our eyes connected and I just remember having this moment where I thought; "Wow, this is amazing,"..."And it just inspired me. You know, I still remember the look on her face. And it’s funny, and she would probably be so annoyed that I say this, but I remember thinking; "Oh my God, she’s so beautiful and she’s so little!"

Huma on Hillary's emails: "It’s something I can’t really think about, but I can’t even imagine what’s in those emails. I would probably be mortified. I have no idea. I haven’t read any of them."


29 posted on 06/05/2016 10:23:42 AM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Females DESTROYED America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Huma and Hitlery are lesbians.


30 posted on 06/05/2016 10:29:15 AM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (The GOPe must be defeated.....the sooner the better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

There is nothing about hillary that is little.

Not her mouth, her ass nor her ego.


31 posted on 06/05/2016 10:29:45 AM PDT by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: DH

She said 90% agree with her???

Really????

I’m not a gambler, but, would gladly take a bet, that Hillary does not get 90% of the vote in the election. Geezzzzz...


32 posted on 06/05/2016 10:30:37 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Hulka
If you can’t vote FOR Trump, vote for him to STOP her.

As my position here is well known (based on the fights I have had here), you may have a point. Hillary will wipe her derriere with the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

33 posted on 06/05/2016 10:33:11 AM PDT by Stepan12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: detective

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

How difficult is it to understand. It’s a right of “the people” and it shall not be “infringed”.


34 posted on 06/05/2016 10:39:14 AM PDT by jimbobfoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

I saw her on This Week this morning. What a vile human being! She actually appeared to be a little put out by Sephanopoulos. She kept saying over and over, regulation of firearms and the most people in the U.S. would agree with it.

Bottomline is that she would remove our guns.


35 posted on 06/05/2016 10:42:57 AM PDT by astadoggy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
STEPHANOPOULOS:

I often wondered why he would contribute $75K to the Clinton Foundation and how he could afford it.

Then I found out he's under a $108 million contract with ABC........

36 posted on 06/05/2016 10:43:08 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (My only regret in life is being too young to get to know my grandfathers before they died)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: astadoggy
Bottomline is that she would remove our guns.

She would TRY.

37 posted on 06/05/2016 10:44:24 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Chuck Norris finally met his match in Donald Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: jimbobfoster

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

Does not the word “militia” also means “law-abiding” folks who keep and bear arms?

Thank-you for your response.


38 posted on 06/05/2016 10:47:56 AM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

that’s different, abortion and sodomy are not in the text of the constitution therefore by liberal logic they are individual rights... but there is no right to firearms ownership, even though it is right there in amendment #2

I just have to wonder, why is Hillary fudging on this... I wouldn’t believe it for a second if she said Amendment #2 is an individual right, but it is politically stupi to try and fudge this.


39 posted on 06/05/2016 10:53:21 AM PDT by Reverend Wright (UK out of the EU; UN out of the USA !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: detective

Evidently shrillary doesn’t know how to read the Supreme Court Heller decision, that said the 2nd amendment is an individual right.

That decision then means “the mitia” in the 2nd Amendment is “the people”, not just the State Guard.


40 posted on 06/05/2016 11:00:38 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson