Just why were lawyers from the DoJ there?
Because this Federal government is INFESTED with the stench of evil. Evil, right down to the bone.
“Memory loss” is a Clinton thing.
The scumbags on the Clinton team really believe we are stupid.
CHERYL MILLS SHOULD HAVE TO ANSER FOR THESE ACTIVITIES
<><> Cheryl Mills rejoined the board of the Clinton Foundation in 2013, after Hillary exited State.
<><> Mills currently runs the BlackIvy Group, a consulting firm that focuses on dirt-poor Sub-Saharan Africa.
<><> Did Hillary’s State Dept grant Cheryl Mill’s BlackIvy Group tax monies?
<><> did any of the Sub-Sahara groups receive foreign aid grants from Hillary’s State dept?
<><>Did any of the Sub-Sahara countries listed below donate to the Clinton Foundation
<><> Did Mill’s BlackIvy Group donate to The Clinton Foundation?
<><> Did the Clinton Foundation partner w/ BlackIvy Group in “humanitarian” sub-Sahara projects?
SUB SAHARAN AFRICA—— African Union Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Cameroon Congo (Brazzaville) Congo (DRC-Kinshasa) Ethiopia Ghana Guinea Ivory Coast Kenya Lesotho
Madagascar Malawi Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Sierra Leone South Africa Swaziland Tanzania Togo Uganda Zambia.
CONTACT CONGRESS HERE: http://www.contactingthecongress.org/
DEMAND CONGRESS SEND YOU THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
<><> TAXPAYERS DEMAND TO KNOW HOW MANY GOVT PAYCHECKS MILLS WAS POCKETING
<><> IS CHERYL MILLS STILL ON THE PAYROLL COLLECTING US GOVT PAYCHECKS (an old bureaucratic trick)?
<><> Is Mills getting federal monies under the State Dept contractor program (said to be missing 6 billion tax dollars under Hillary)?
Funny, the media doesn’t find this bothersome at all.
“Nevertheless, Mills confirmed that President Bill Clinton first established ClintonEmail.com on the private email server to communicate with his office staff, evidently while he was still president. “
Is this the same Bill Clinton that stated he NEVER USED EMAIL ????
Another flareup of malignant liberal assholitis.
Cheryl pulled her usual ploy for much of what was being brought up .... she is Hilly’s attorney & therefore anything to do with Hilly is “privileged”. That was the reason for a lot of the objections ..... however, I only made it through page 28 of Mills’ deposition before I had to quit due to nausea.
The DoJ lawyers were there to protect Hillary.
Lying bastards need to be in jail.
Judicial Watch President: ‘Tough Going’ in Deposition With Hillary Aide
[video on FOX]
Good interview .... Mills blames Benghazi for not being able to ‘focus’ on emails ...... also, using attorney status to avoid answering questions.
The media would be all over this, big time, if it was any Republican instead of Mills. It would be front page on the NYT and Washington Compost.
Justice Department Attorney - Objection!
Judicial Watch Attorney - Ok, well did you work at the Department of State>
Justice Department Attorney - Objection!
Judicial Watch Attorney - Well let's try this one, are you an aide of Hillary Clinton?
Justice Department Attorney - Objection!
Judicial Watch Attorney - Well I think there is a pattern here, is there any question you are willing to answer Ms. Mills?
Justice Department Attorney - Objection!
Judicial Watch Attorney - Then I do not see a reason to continue, thank you for coming Ms. Mills.
Justice Department Attorney - Objection!
This is the “Bell Curve” on display.
Please folks, do not get your shorts in a wad over this Kabuki Theater.
While Judicial Watch may be serious about exposing and cleansing the Clinton corruption, they are in a very small minority. The entire Washington establishment is doing everything in their power to shield the Clintons. Shielding the Clintons while, getting themselves reelected of course. When shielding the Clintons and getting reelected conflict, most will accept the payoff.
hillary did this back when she had all those gates when she was first lady ..she couldnt remember...the liar
And if CONGRESS was not Impotent, weak, and CORRUPT to the CORE, this could have been handled a long time ago
Congress has ALL the power in washington, the executive and judicial branch operate according to the whims of CONGRESS!
“U.S. CODE
TITLE 2—THE CONGRESS
CHAPTER 6—CONGRESSIONAL AND COMMITTEE PROCEDURE; INVESTIGATIONS
Sec. 193. Privilege of witnesses
No witness is privileged to refuse to testify to any fact, or to produce any paper, respecting which he shall be examined by either House of Congress, or by any joint committee established by a joint or concurrent resolution of the two Houses of Congress, or by any committee of either House, upon the ground that his testimony to such fact or his production of such paper may tend to disgrace him or otherwise render him infamous.”
Simply look up Hinds Precedents, especially chapters 53 and 51, and Cannon’s Precedents, especially chapters 184-185. You’ll find numerous detailed cases of Congress asserting its power, arresting people, holding them until they agreed to answer questions, and then releasing them. Some of these people did not refuse to appear, but simply failed to satisfactorily answer questions. One has to wonder how a previous Congress might have responded to Alberto Gonzales’s endless recitations of “I do not recall.”
Congress can Remove the President
Congress can remove the head of every executive agency Congress can remove ALL of their employees
Congress can Abolish every agency they so choose
Congress can remove EVERY JUDGE IN AMERICA, including every supreme court justice.
Congress can abolish every federal court except the supreme Court
Congress can decide which cases the Judicial Branch can hear and decide
CONGRESS can Imprison ANYONE they want for any reason they so desire for as long as they wish.
Congress can declare WAR
No other governing body has even 10% of the power CONGRESS has!!
CONGRESS IS ALLOWING ALL OF IT!!!
Congress has the authority to arrest and imprison those found in Contempt. The power extends throughout the United States and is an inherent power (does not depend upon legislated act)
If found in Contempt the person can be arrested under a warrant of the Speaker of the House of Representatives or President of the Senate, by the respective Sergeant at Arms.
Statutory criminal contempt is an alternative to inherent contempt.
Under the inherent contempt power Congress may imprison a person for a specific period of time or an indefinite period of time, except a person imprisoned by the House of Representatives may not be imprisoned beyond adjournment of a session of Congress.
Imprisonment may be coercive or punitive.
Some references
[1] Joseph Story’s Commentaries on the Constitution, Volume 2, § 842 http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/print_documents/a1_5s21.html
[2] Anderson v. Dunn - 19 U.S. 204 - “And, as to the distance to which the process might reach, it is very clear that there exists no reason for confining its operation to the limits of the District of Columbia; after passing those limits, we know no bounds that can be prescribed to its range but those of the United States.” http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/19/204/case.html
[3] Jurney v. MacCracken, 294 U.S. 125 http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/294/125/case.html 73rd Cong., 78 Cong. Rec. 2410 (1934) https://archive.org/details/congressionalrec78aunit
[4] McGrain v. Daugherty, 273 U.S. 135 - Under a warrant issued by the President of the Senate the Deputy to the Senate Sergeant at Arms arrested at Cincinnati, Ohio, Mally S. Daugherty, who had been twice subpoenaed by the Senate and twice failed to appear. http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/273/135/case.html
[5] Rules of the House of Representatives, Rule IV Duties of the Sergeant at Arms - [] execute the commands of the House, and all processes issued by authority thereof, directed to him by the Speaker. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/HMAN-105/pdf/HMAN-105-pg348.pdf
[6] An analysis of Congressional inquiry, subpoena, and enforcement http://www.constitutionproject.org/documents/when-congress-comes-calling-a-primer-on-the-principles-practices-and-pragmatics-of-legislative-inquiry/
In 1857, a New York Times reporter refused to say which members of Congress had asked him to get them bribes (protecting his “sources” just as various Judith Millers today protect the people who feed them proven lies that costs thousands of lives), so Congress locked him up until he answered and then banned him from Congress.
In 1924 an oil executive appeared but refused to answer certain questions, so the Senate held — literally held — him in contempt. Senator Thomas Walsh of Montana argued that this question of contempt was of the gravest importance, and that it involved “the very life of the effective existence of the House of Representatives of the United States and of the Senate of the United States.” The matter was taken to court, and the witness fined and imprisoned.
This is who we need.