Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Crews Fail To Place in NATO Tank Competition
Popular Mechanics ^ | 5/17/16 | Kyle Mizokami May 17, 2016

Posted on 05/19/2016 6:59:59 AM PDT by Nachum

A recent competition hosted in part by the U.S. Army and designed to test core tank crew skills saw European crews take the top honors, while crews from the U.S. Army failed to place. The results raise the question of whether the Army—after more than a decade of focusing on guerrilla warfare—has devoted adequate training to address "big war" skills.

Held from May 10 to 12 and jointly hosted by the U.S. Army and the German Bundeswehr at the Grafenwoehr Training Area in Germany, the the Strong Europe Tank Challenge included challengers from six NATO countries: Denmark, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Slovenia—which sent tank platoons of four tanks each to compete— and the United States, which sent two platoons.

(Excerpt) Read more at popularmechanics.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bhodod; competition; crews; nato; obamalegacy; tank; usarmy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: from occupied ga

How could you forget bringing in transvestites, that is much more important than any silly tank competition. Combat readiness is not that important anymore.


21 posted on 05/19/2016 7:35:28 AM PDT by phormer phrog phlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
crews from the U.S. Army failed to place

But they were oh, so tolerant and sensitive, don't you know...

22 posted on 05/19/2016 7:36:01 AM PDT by grobdriver (Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

Is there a “Top Gun” school for tankers?

Yes, at Fort Knox, Kentucky! In a virtual reality world and on the range.


23 posted on 05/19/2016 7:37:12 AM PDT by 2001convSVT (Going Galt as fast as I can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2001convSVT

sad, but true...


24 posted on 05/19/2016 7:44:29 AM PDT by brivette (no tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I read an article by somebody involved with a military “think-tank” (no pun intended) many years ago, and I do mean many years ago espousing tank warfare as antiquated, and that tanks were going the way of the dinosaur.

We still have tanks therefore we should be the best we can possibly be until we don’t.


25 posted on 05/19/2016 7:45:11 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists Call 'em what you will, they all have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lower Deck

Maybe we just sent the wrong crews, since National Guard tankers beat their Regular U.S. Army counterparts—and crews from the U.S. Marine Corps and Canadian Army—at the U.S. Army’s 2016 Sullivan Cup. The winning tank crew consisting of an insurance adjustor, Pepsi truck driver, college student, and aspiring police officer.


26 posted on 05/19/2016 7:55:58 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Well, to be fair to the US Army, it’s a little difficult loading a cannon while you’re wearing a dress and high heels.


27 posted on 05/19/2016 8:01:39 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

In 1939, the Polish Cavalry was the finest cavalry in the world. But the Germans had developed tank warfare as the hammer for their blitzkrieg.

Perhaps drones and helicopters have now turned tank brigades into “Polish Cavalry”?


28 posted on 05/19/2016 8:02:21 AM PDT by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
Beating NATO tanks isn't as important as killing Russian tanks.

The M-1 has been proven in battle many times over. I'm not so sure about the Leopard although I know it is in the same class.

29 posted on 05/19/2016 8:02:22 AM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

Who we sent:
U.S. Army’s 1st Platoon, D Company and 3rd Platoon, C Company both from 2nd Battalion, 7th Infantry Regiment, 1st Brigade, 3rd Infantry Division.


30 posted on 05/19/2016 8:04:59 AM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

There is a limited amount of time, money, facilities and equipment for training.

You can use those resources training people to win a “game” in Germany, or you can use them to train Soldiers for war.

Depends on your priorities, I guess.


31 posted on 05/19/2016 8:11:45 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6
You can use those resources training people to win a “game” in Germany, or you can use them to train Soldiers for war.

Seeing as how we are prepared for neither.

32 posted on 05/19/2016 8:13:40 AM PDT by Nachum (ISIS is alive... and Chris Stevens is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

First, congratulations to the winners and every tank crew in this competition was a winner to just to get to it. It’s like an Olympics.

Second, back in the day when I was in the Army in Germany, we thought we were hot sh*t. But, were we surprised that our comrades in the National Guard, and the long haired, pot-smoking tank crews from the Netherlands, and conscripts from Germany could compete with us.

Third, wars aren’t won or lost based on individual tank crews, or individual aircraft crews, or whatever, although each man, each crew, and each combination of crew and weapon system makes his contribution. The proficiency of tank crews, number of tanks, their strategic and tactical mobility, combined arms, maintenance and supply, and the battle plan all are very important.

Regarding the Abrams, the M1A2 Abrams is on the big side as “main battle tanks” go, but the Leopard 2 is about the same size, and is similar in many other characteristics. The Abrams has only limited foreign buyers and among the few, one is now looking to order Leopard 2s. As I have seen cost estimate of $5 to 6 million apiece for each, I wonder what’s going on.


33 posted on 05/19/2016 8:14:15 AM PDT by Redmen4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKUHilltopper

It will take skilled people to run those.
And it seems to me the armed forces are running that type of individual out the door.


34 posted on 05/19/2016 8:20:54 AM PDT by winodog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

Yeah, and they should have sent North Carolina National Guard tankers.


35 posted on 05/19/2016 8:48:01 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Meaningless. We actually very rarely win these intra-army competitions. At least the ones that only involve simulated combat with allies. But we’re pretty solid when it comes time to actually kill bad guys.


36 posted on 05/19/2016 8:52:17 AM PDT by discostu (Joan Crawford has risen from the grave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Obama must have sent his pajama boy tank crews.


37 posted on 05/19/2016 9:40:47 AM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
An Army of No Training.

My guess is that the crews have hardly any live-fire training.

It was the same at Ft. Hood when Clinton took over: instead of training, the crews were sent to mow lawns and pick up trash.

You can also thank the spineless Republicans who agreed to the sequester knowing Obama would use that as an excuse to gut the military.

38 posted on 05/19/2016 9:44:25 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Patton must be rolling over in his grave.


39 posted on 05/19/2016 9:45:12 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Puke.

Our tankers are the envy of the world. Not place my ass. Probably because they don’t care about a stupid “competition “.

All I care is in real battle, they kick ass with low losses.

Too many dumb articles on FR these days.


40 posted on 05/19/2016 11:20:56 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (The Confederate Flag is the new "N" word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson