Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is a very good analysis of Hillary Clinton and the current legal actions.
1 posted on 05/12/2016 1:58:01 AM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: Blue Jays

Someone within the corrupt Clinton Machine will likely yield under FBI interrogation to tell the truth and save themselves.

2 posted on 05/12/2016 2:04:22 AM PDT by Blue Jays (Rock Hard, Ride Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

The term “espionage” will not fly with the public.....they need to say that Hillary SOLD SECRETS for “donations” to the Clinton Crime Family Slush Fund! More people would understand it.


5 posted on 05/12/2016 2:20:04 AM PDT by Ann Archy (ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Of course the Obama courts will ignore all this evidence. But the Trump campaign certainly shouldn’t.


11 posted on 05/12/2016 3:15:11 AM PDT by samtheman (Trump For America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

So far all I hear is noise, when I actually see some indictments then I will believe it.


14 posted on 05/12/2016 3:32:44 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

“These interrogations were voluntary, not under oath, and done in the presence of the same legal team which represented all five aides.”

Then they were not interrogations at all.
They were interviews.


15 posted on 05/12/2016 3:38:51 AM PDT by bill1952 (taxes don't hurt the rich, they keep YOU from becoming rich.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

She’ll be indicted when the Democrats no longer believe she can beat Trump. She’ll step aside and some dark horse will take her place.


17 posted on 05/12/2016 3:46:47 AM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Bookmark.


18 posted on 05/12/2016 3:46:48 AM PDT by SunTzuWu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Enter, Joe Biden???


19 posted on 05/12/2016 3:49:12 AM PDT by Baldwin77 (They hated Reagan too ! TRUMP TOUGH - AMERICA STRONG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective
"not under oath"

Worthless.

21 posted on 05/12/2016 3:53:54 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

I just want to see that smug smirk wiped off of her face.

I want to see her fear as her past finally catches up with her - especially the ghosts of Arkancide past.


22 posted on 05/12/2016 3:57:39 AM PDT by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IncPen

Only legal misery tough enough for this con artist is jail


28 posted on 05/12/2016 4:20:04 AM PDT by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

The Judge and everyone on this thread speaks logic and the rule of law.

Unfortunately, this is Obama-Clinton America. All that matters is whether Hillary has enough information to blackmail Obama. The more she has, the more likely she’ll get elected President. If she has just a little, she’ll get pardoned.


38 posted on 05/12/2016 4:43:24 AM PDT by ReaganGeneration2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

All this leaking might lead one to the conclusion that DOJ is trying to avoid the obvious misdeeds of Hillary and the FBI is making sure enough information gets out there that the DOJ cant ignore the obvious.


39 posted on 05/12/2016 4:54:24 AM PDT by IamConservative (There is no greater threat to our freedoms than Bipartisanship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective
Very good, indeed.

This is treacherous ground for any target, even a smart lawyer like Mrs. Clinton. She does not know what the feds know about her. She faces a damned-if-she-does and damned-if-she-doesn’t choice here.

She has to assume they know everything. Her defense options are to play ignorant (wipe it...like with a cloth) blame it on someone else, (the IT guy told me the server was fireproof), claim lack of intent (see the following statement from Napolitano) or split hairs (I never sent or received emails marked classified at the time). When it comes to a criminal investigation, none of the above will hold much water. The last recourse would be to strong arm Obama and the DOJ into not pressing criminal charges or maybe settling for some kind of slap on the wrist. As I understand it, even a slap on the wrist would end her political career, but at least she wouldn't end up in the slammer and could still rake in millions running around the country attacking the VRWC.

Mrs. Clinton’s folks are preparing for the worst. They have leaked nonsense from “U.S. officials” that the feds have found no intent to commit espionage on the part of Mrs. Clinton. Too bad these officials -- political appointees, no doubt -- skipped or failed Criminal Law 101. The government need not prove intent for either espionage or for lying to federal agents.

41 posted on 05/12/2016 4:58:48 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

The Russians and the Iranians have the email and have used them to black mail this administration into some really bad deals for the US.

Shame on Hillary, a pox on her and her shameless greed for money and power!

She must be denied!


45 posted on 05/12/2016 5:32:21 AM PDT by urbanpovertylawcenter (the law and poverty collide in an urban setting and sparks fly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Worthless - not under oath.

Where are the Grand Juries?

They ‘Grand Juried” Martha Stewart and dumped her in jail for ‘lying’...Couldn’t prove ANYthing re insider trading - but scared/threatening a young man who worked for her to change his testimony to what THEY wanted said -

When they are serious about bringing someone to justice - or in railroading - they convene Grand Juries. Anything else is window dressing.


46 posted on 05/12/2016 5:35:12 AM PDT by maine-iac7 (A Christian is as a Christian does - "By their works...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

You don’t have to be under oath to be questioned. I would say the reason Mills went in for an interview was because the FBI threatened to formally charge her. She went in thinking it was going to be a routine interview until the FBI “sprung” something on her. That’s why her and her lawyer got up and left. They knew they got had. She couldnt plead the 5th because she wasn’t charged, so they come up with client/lawyer privilege. Is she is saying, she didnt work for the state, but as Hillary’s council?

The FBI has another opening here since this is also a civil case. I believe any deposition taken in a civil case can be used against them in the criminal case even if it isnt related to the original charges.

This is just my opinion.

One thing to remember is the FBI is stacked with professional investigators, who have dedicated time, energy and resources to tbis investigation. Hillary has crapped on them for 40 years, to include Comey. I hoping the “good” guys have had enough.


48 posted on 05/12/2016 5:45:09 AM PDT by PJammers (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

The Judge is smoking something.
No harm shall befall a hair on her fake blonde head.

So King Odumbo has decreed, so it shall be done.


50 posted on 05/12/2016 6:10:17 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Bookmark


51 posted on 05/12/2016 6:11:27 AM PDT by Cap Huff (1776 - Washington fought on our side. 2016 Washington is fighting against us . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective
and done in the presence of the same legal team which represented all five aides

Meaning the REAL client of the legal team was Hillary. If you don't have a lawyer who represents you exclusively, then you don't have a lawyer.

53 posted on 05/12/2016 6:18:29 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson