Posted on 04/11/2016 5:18:55 PM PDT by lodi90
If Ted Bush and his GOP e buddies have anything to say about it, yes he will.
Even Rush understands this:
“Make no mistake, the Republican powers that be do not want Trump, and they don’t want Cruz. They did want Jeb. They wouldn’t mind Kasich. They are drooling over Paul Ryan. And they would take Romney again.”
Trump’s a really smart guy, you can’t swindle him.
Did you know that...
Trump Campaign Manager Corey Lewandowski fired Trump’s Colorado state director, James Baker, shortly before this week’s state convention.<<
http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/08/politics/republican-colorado-michigan-convention/
That wouldn’t have anything to do with Trump’s responsibility for writing off Colorado?
DK
Why doesn’t Trump give Cruz his cut of the delegates in Florida?
SoreLoser Trump is not such a great deal maker after all. He didn’t even show up in Colorado for the caucus. Cruz did. He did not learn the rules. What he team did do was riddled with costly errors. It is there own dang fault.
Sir, there are two passions which have a powerful influence on the affairs of men. These are ambition and avarice; the love of power, and the love of money. Separately each of these has great force in prompting men to action; but when united in view of the same object, they have in many minds the most violent effects. place before the eyes of such men a post of honour that shall at the same time be a place of profit, and they will move heaven and earth to obtain it. The vast number of such places it is that renders the British Government so tempestuous. The struggles for them are the true sources of all those factions which are perpetually dividing the Nation, distracting its councils, hurrying sometimes into fruitless & mischievous wars, and often compelling a submission to dishonorable terms of peace.
And of what kind are the men that will strive for this profitable pre-eminence, through all the bustle of cabal, the heat of contention, the infinite mutual abuse of parties, tearing to pieces the best of characters? It will not be the wise and moderate, the lovers of peace and good order, the men fittest for the trust. It will be the bold and the violent, the men of strong passions and indefatigable activity in their selfish pursuits. These will thrust themselves into your Government and be your rulers. And these too will be mistaken in the expected happiness of their situation: For their vanquished competitors of the same spirit, and from the same motives will perpetually be endeavouring to distress their administration, thwart their measures, and render them odious to the people.
Besides these evils, Sir, tho’ we may set out in the beginning with moderate salaries, we shall find that such will not [83] be of long continuance. Reasons will never be wanting for proposed augmentations. And there will always be a party for giving more to the rulers, that the rulers may be able in return to give more to them. —Hence as all history informs us, there has been in every State & Kingdom a constant kind of warfare between the Governing & Governed: the one striving to obtain more for its support, and the other to pay less. And this has alone occasioned great convulsions, actual civil wars, ending either in dethroning of the Princes or enslaving of the people. Generally indeed the ruling power carries its point, the revenues of princes constantly increasing, and we see that they are never satisfied, but always in want of more. The more the people are discontented with the oppression of taxes; the greater need the prince has of money to distribute among his partizans and pay the troops that are to suppress all resistance, and enable him to plunder at pleasure. There is scarce a king in a hundred who would not, if he could, follow the example of Pharoah, get first all the peoples money, then all their lands, and then make them and their children servants forever. It will be said, that we don’t propose to establish Kings. I know it. But there is a natural inclination in mankind to Kingly Government. It sometimes relieves them from Aristocratic domination. They had rather have one tyrant than five hundred. It gives more of the appearance of equality among Citizens, and that they like. I am apprehensive therefore, perhaps too apprehensive, that the Government of these States, may in future times, end in a Monarchy. But this Catastrophe I think may be long delayed, if in our proposed system we do not sow the seeds of contention, faction & tumult, by making our posts of honor, places of profit. If we do, I fear that tho’ we do employ at first a number, and not a single person, the number will in time be set aside, it will only nourish the fœtus of a King, as the honorable gentleman from Virginia very aptly expressed it, and a King will the sooner be set over us.
http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/1057
Yep dumb Cruz voters....ha! Sorry no such thing. Well Ryan just put out a video showing how great congress is doing...ha! But the media is calling it very presidential. This country is cooked and Cruz is turning up the heat to its destruction.
You are dumb! Trump got Florida with voters. If Cruz would have gotten Colorado with voters. No big deal. But that is not what happened and you know it. I never thought I’d see so many communist on this site and you are number 1 communist of all.
And the Cruzers here are out “baying at the moon” now over this “collusion” between the Trump and K-sick campaigns to keep Cruz from a repeat performance of delegate stealing in Michigan. It isn't that Cruz is again “diddling the system” because he's unable to win much of anything head on, but rather that now K-sick is Trump's running mate. But then Cruz is a sleazy lawyer, so what he's doing is completely in character for his “kind.” As a group, I've never seen anything like the Cruzers growing lists of excuses and ad hominem attacks to support a candidate they must know in the back of their small minds is not very likely to win the nomination. And my gut tells me that these are the same rigid “iealogues” who have been staying home from the polls because the nominee “doesn't meet their specs," and in so doing, accepting that we have a president who's far worse than they guy they don't like.
nope in was in aug 2015 and Carson was leading there and Trump was ahead of cruzer loser at the time.
Only to their dismay, and dismay it will be unless their utter intent is to elect billary.
The question is will he ever stop crying?
ROFL
Those two images are classic! ;-)
“But because they are giving the stolen delegates to Cruz’s sheep, they are okay with it.”
The ‘rules’ were known on and since October 1st, 2015. Trump dropped the ball in CO.
Win a majority of the delegates before the convention and you win the nomination. It’s pretty straight forward.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.