Posted on 04/01/2016 6:25:53 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Let me rephrase my last...
There’s no evidence on either. My point was that people are glomming onto bits of crap gossip when there’s absolutely nothing there. This has been ongoing about Cruz for a week and there’s no more evidence of his wrongdoing now than the nanosecond NE spewed its propaganda.
I jumped rated harshly on my previous, so let me rephrase:
There’s no evidence on either. My point was that people are glomming onto bits of crap gossip when there’s absolutely nothing there. This has been ongoing about Cruz for a week and there’s no more evidence of his wrongdoing now than the nanosecond NE spewed its propaganda.
And there’s no possibility that Cruz loves his family now, even if he was on a list from 13 or more years ago?
What were you doing 13 years ago?
Heck, what was Donald Trump doing 13 years ago?
[[Donald Trump “may be” a good friend of pedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.
Oh, wait.. no “may be” about it.]]
Are you serious? Did he go to epstein’s predophile island like possibly clinton and that lawyer did? Trumps iwll just claim he didn’t know about his sex crimes no doubt-
“Cruz mistress crises comin’ soon!”
Sure they are, just as soon as you can find some evidence...
[[There isn’t a shred of evidence Ted Cruz is in that book....if you were really concerned about slime you would be denouncing this drivel!!!]]
Oh, but didn’t you see? There are some calls from DC and from TX- and the only person known to exist in DC and Texas is Ted- population 1: Therefore He must be the one that called her- After all- the National Enquirer, that Tower of Truth, that House of Honesty, that Empire of integrity- said Ted slept with prostitute- therefore he did- because it’s not like the NE lies for sensational slimy profit or anything
[[Seriously? We have reached the point where we are posting malicious gossip that is so poorly sourced it would probably not even be repeated on Page 6. I am not a Cruze supporter but this is pretty sleazy.]]
Says a lot about some of the ‘conservative’ posters on this site doesn’t it? I hope like hell they don’t ever get called for jury duty because they go in with their minds made up- they invent crap out of thin air- and they love bearing false witness- Lord pity those who have to sit under a jury of folks like that
“Cruz mistress crises comin’ soon! You cruz bots are so in love with his evangelical conservatism that you may want to start lookin for the nearest a counselor. Or just stock up on boxes of Kleenex”
It’s people like you who believe Oliver Stone’s “JFK” was a documentary, that “Batboy” lives in Memphis, and that “rasslin’s” real.
[[If ted is innocent he has nothing to worry about.]]
BS- He’s already suffered insurmountably because of people bearing false witness against him if he is innocent- that is why God Hates people who bear false witness because it Destroys innocent people- God calls rumor mongering, gossip and bearing false witness an abomination- the strongest word imaginable- right up there with homosexuality and bestiality and witchcraft because it is such a nasty vile thing to do to people-
If ted is innocent (which the anti-cruz zealots will never accept) there are going to be a lot of people on FR guilty of an abomination in the sight of the Lord- He does not take this sin lightly! Adn they can scoff at it and excuse this despicable sin all they like- but they had better hope ted is actually guilty, because they are so invested in sliming him and ruining his life, his wife’s life, his kid’s lives, and the livies of the 5 women i n the article at the slimy NE that if Ted is innocent, they committed a very serious sin against not just Ted- his family and the women, but also against God directly-
Gossip and bearing false witness is one of those sins, like witchcraft, homosexuality, bestiality, where the sinner has to make a conscious decision to disobey what they know to be right and devote their lives to the sin in direct defiance of God- Most sins are simple acts of falling- but those mentioned by God as abominations are called such a strong word precisely because it takes such a cold callous heart and willful disobedience that the person has sold their soul to it in complete devotion to it- it’s the last thing on their mind at night, and the first thing on their mind in morning- it consumes their every waking moment practically-
You do realize that if anyone on here, with actual malice, slandered Cruz, his wife, his kids and the five women, they can ask for forgiveness. You’ve done a lot of preaching about Christianity but you left out the most important part.
Who said anything about Cruz loving his family?
The comment made regarding Trump is that it is not likely that he is today unfaithful to his wife because he loves his family so much. He has a new situation. He has already admitted to long ago affairs of the past and he’s been open and honest about it.
Cruz has admitted to no affairs and he may very well never have had any.
The comment addressed the lawyer’s declaration and the analysis of who it might be if the lawyer’s declaration is true.
It doesn’t seem likely it would be Trump because he was in Manhattan at the time of the affairs. But it’s possible he could have visited DC and partook in the nastiness.
The most likely are Sanders and Cruz because they were in DC at the time, full-time. Most of the already released names were full-time in DC.
Whether the above is true or not is not what the comment referred to. The comment referred to the thread’s source analysis. It was a summary of what was presented on video.
If the lawyer was telling the truth, and it happened to be Cruz, then it would make a difference in the election because it might make him seem hypocritical. No doubt, many Cruz supporters would turn away from him if it turned out to be true.
It would not make a difference to Donald Trump because he has already come clean and because he now has a loving and faithful relationship with his wife and family. He will not lose support.
With Sanders? Who knows? It might or might not make a difference.
Is the lawyer telling the truth? He risks disbarment if he is lying. He has already sued the clerk and the judge who blocked his lawsuit filing on the matter, and he’s caused the judge to resign amid other allegations of impropriety.
One fact is that there is a list. Another fact is there are still hundreds of names on the list that have not been released.
So until there is a released list of names, this thread is much ado about nothing except for out-of-line hecklers of Trump.
The problem is that there are rabid Cruz supporters blaming Trump for his situation. That’s why I posted and also because people were asking how could it be Cruz when they thought he was not in DC at the time. He was.
Then I asked what difference would it make if it were true.
The fact of the matter is this lawyer is in the news and he’s making statements that the material he has can affect the 2016 election. So an analysis of the possibilities of this news is fair game. Yet there is a constant volley of crap thrown at Trump as if any analysis away from Trump is to be forbidden. Could it be Trump? Possibly. Could it be Cruz? Possibly but more likely than Trump.
Here’s a shorter summary:
Trump living in DC at the time? No.
Cruz living in DC at the time? Yes.
Trump still philandering? Not likely. Melania has already said she would walk at the first sign of such.
Cruz philandering? Unknown, unlikely. Would be shocking, if true.
Trump’s 2016 bid affected if name on the list? Not likely, he’s already come clean; it’s in the past.
Cruz’ 2016 bid affected if name on the list? Possible some of his supporters would bolt.
You’re responding to me trying to defend Cruz. No attack was made on Cruz. What was said about Cruz is in the video that is sourced to this thread. I was summarizing it for those who did not or could not watch it. And yet you confront me. F’ Off!
The difference with Kasich is if it was in his bad boy days, he was single.
Good point. Then it isn’t Cruz.
If the name is Trump, Kasich, or Hillary it won’t hurt them. Or Bernie. Though it will be hard for the reporters to announce without laughing.
Hillary being a lesbian will probably help her. She can have a sobfest coming out presser. It will make Bill look good too.
Kasich was single. He can go the “lonely busy congressman” route.
I don’t think it’s Trump because he was such a germaphobe and he doesn’t need a hooker in DC when he can fly home. But if it is, everyone already knows he was a playa. But I think he liked conquests of beautiful model types etc, not hookers.
If it isn’t Cruz, it doesn’t change anything.
Oh wait a second. The one prostitute that is right now fearing for her life, if the story is true, did say she serviced him in DC and TX.
Cruz was frequently in DC as Solicitor General trying cases before the Supreme Court.
Good summing up. Some are saying Cruz wasn’t in DC when the madam was in biz. Was he, or wasn’t he?
If it’s the gopE smearing Cruz they won’t drop the hammer until they’ve finished using him to stop Trump.
I wonder if that were to happen would the Cruz supporters switch to Trump? The delegates will switch to whomever they’re told to switch to and it won’t be Trump.
Ah, thanks. That makes sense. And he had no idea he would ever run for Pres so he might well have partaken. Back then maybe his job didn’t bring in the babes like apparently senator does.
We’re not talking about what they COULD DO later- we’re talking about what they ARE doing now- Of course they can ask for forgiveness- that isn’t the issue- IF Ted is innocent- they are destroying a man and his family and 5 women NOW and doing so giddily and with great fervor- and God declares such tights an abomination- Don’t try to justify present behavior by stating they can later ask for forgiveness- this behavior NOW isn’t justifiable! so i stand by my post-
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.