And there’s no possibility that Cruz loves his family now, even if he was on a list from 13 or more years ago?
What were you doing 13 years ago?
Heck, what was Donald Trump doing 13 years ago?
Who said anything about Cruz loving his family?
The comment made regarding Trump is that it is not likely that he is today unfaithful to his wife because he loves his family so much. He has a new situation. He has already admitted to long ago affairs of the past and he’s been open and honest about it.
Cruz has admitted to no affairs and he may very well never have had any.
The comment addressed the lawyer’s declaration and the analysis of who it might be if the lawyer’s declaration is true.
It doesn’t seem likely it would be Trump because he was in Manhattan at the time of the affairs. But it’s possible he could have visited DC and partook in the nastiness.
The most likely are Sanders and Cruz because they were in DC at the time, full-time. Most of the already released names were full-time in DC.
Whether the above is true or not is not what the comment referred to. The comment referred to the thread’s source analysis. It was a summary of what was presented on video.
If the lawyer was telling the truth, and it happened to be Cruz, then it would make a difference in the election because it might make him seem hypocritical. No doubt, many Cruz supporters would turn away from him if it turned out to be true.
It would not make a difference to Donald Trump because he has already come clean and because he now has a loving and faithful relationship with his wife and family. He will not lose support.
With Sanders? Who knows? It might or might not make a difference.
Is the lawyer telling the truth? He risks disbarment if he is lying. He has already sued the clerk and the judge who blocked his lawsuit filing on the matter, and he’s caused the judge to resign amid other allegations of impropriety.
One fact is that there is a list. Another fact is there are still hundreds of names on the list that have not been released.
So until there is a released list of names, this thread is much ado about nothing except for out-of-line hecklers of Trump.
The problem is that there are rabid Cruz supporters blaming Trump for his situation. That’s why I posted and also because people were asking how could it be Cruz when they thought he was not in DC at the time. He was.
Then I asked what difference would it make if it were true.
The fact of the matter is this lawyer is in the news and he’s making statements that the material he has can affect the 2016 election. So an analysis of the possibilities of this news is fair game. Yet there is a constant volley of crap thrown at Trump as if any analysis away from Trump is to be forbidden. Could it be Trump? Possibly. Could it be Cruz? Possibly but more likely than Trump.
Here’s a shorter summary:
Trump living in DC at the time? No.
Cruz living in DC at the time? Yes.
Trump still philandering? Not likely. Melania has already said she would walk at the first sign of such.
Cruz philandering? Unknown, unlikely. Would be shocking, if true.
Trump’s 2016 bid affected if name on the list? Not likely, he’s already come clean; it’s in the past.
Cruz’ 2016 bid affected if name on the list? Possible some of his supporters would bolt.
You’re responding to me trying to defend Cruz. No attack was made on Cruz. What was said about Cruz is in the video that is sourced to this thread. I was summarizing it for those who did not or could not watch it. And yet you confront me. F’ Off!