Posted on 02/12/2016 6:06:47 AM PST by HomerBohn
Strange. My statement concerning Andrew Jackson got lost so here is what I also wrote.
Andrew Jackson carried a sword cane and used it to kill a political enemy. He also used it to thrash an assassin.
“MRS. ROOSEVELT CARRIES PISTOL
NEW YORK, March 7
(IP)Mrs. Franklin D. Roosevelt carries a long barreled pistol on her frequent motor trips about the country, friends said tonight, as a concession to the secret service and not because she fears for her own safety. “If you want to get her down on you “for good,” one of them confided, “just hint that she is afraid to travel alone.”
The President’s wife disclosed in New Orleans yesterday that she carries a pistol in her automobile and “can use it.” She added that she had the “same training with a pistol that the New York National Guard has.”-—
Mon. March 9, 1937 “Plattsburgh Daily Press”
‘Owned’ != carry.
DT says he ‘always carries’, he doesn’t rely upon security for his own self-protection.
I can be pretty safe to presume DT would not work to cripple/remove the same option of We the People.
For the other two?
I’d like to hear (see?) the same. But, I’m not holding my breath for me to finally hear they actually rely upon OTHERS (security). That would give me pause on their 2nd stance(s); as most career politicians are want to do.
Depends upon whether it’s a NY permit or a federal permit.
The only federal permit I am aware of is for law enforcement officers.
http://www.gunlawsbystate.com/national-carry-permit/
http://concealednation.org/2015/12/federal-concealed-carry-permits-do-they-exist-for-citizens/
Thank you. I learned something today.
I do believe that if all states have to recognize homosexual marriage licenses issued in other states then all states have to recognize concealed carry permits issued in other states.
Unfortunately, the actual text of the Constitution, the intent of its drafters, logic, common sense, precedent, and the previously accepted rules of statutory construction are all now utterly irrelevant.
The Constitution now says whatever the Hell five out of nine Supreme Court Justices currently want it to say. IMHO, this is the primary issue in the election.
Four sitting Supreme Court Justices will be over 80 years old this year (Kennedy, Scalia, Ginsburg and Breyer). Of the remaining five Justices, two are young far left-wing Obama appointees who will be legislating from the bench for the next 30 to 40 years (Sotomayor and Kagan), two are reliable conservatives (Thomas and Alito) and the other is a flipper (Roberts).
I am betting that Obama will get to replace at least one of the octogenarian Justices (Ginsburg) and possibly two (Breyer) before he leave office. Ginsburg will step down immediately after the current Court term and if at least a couple of RINOs join with the Democrats to confirm Obama’s far left-wing replacement then Breyer will announce his retirement so that Obama will get to pick his far left-wing replacement as well. That would leave only two octogenarian Justices (Scalia and Kennedy) for the next President to replace, and four young, reliable far left-wing Justices firmly planted on the Court.
If any three of the four octogenarian Justices are replaced with liberals then a far left-wing oligarchy of Supreme Court Justices will rule over every aspect of our lives for the next generation to come. Say goodbye to the Second Amendment, free speech, and every other right that is currently hanging on by a 5 to 4 thread.
On the other hand, if three of the octogenarians are replaced with strict construction conservatives, then they can join with Thomas and Alito and reverse Roe, homosexual marriage, Obamacare, and every other liberal Supreme Court decree over the past 40 years.
So, our only chance is for the Republicans to hold on to the Senate AND for us to elect a Conservative President who will only nominate Conservative judges. If Chuckie Schumer controls the Senate OR if we elect a President who appoints liberal or moderate judges, then our nations is well and truly screwed.
Eleanor probably was afraid of meeting up with a patriot.
Let’s just take a chance, like so many clueless imbeciles did on electing this abortion of a human being currently ensconced in the White Hut their president.
He just might be the one who can turn this Titanic away from the iceberg.
He did.
But Craig Livingstone drove him there with a picnic basket packed by....Hitlery!
I suspect that as a private citizen he had the same ability to change the world that you have.
So what have you done to change it?
Not sure what this has to do with my post.
Nope=-
Eleanor probably was afraid of meeting up with a bootlegger.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.