Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz Not Eligible To Be POTUS, According to Most Plausible Interpretation of Constitution
Hot Air ^ | 2/10/16

Posted on 02/10/2016 1:55:32 PM PST by drewh

With Ted Cruz the victor of the first contest of the GOP nominating calendar, we can no longer avoid the question mischievously posed by Donald Trump: Is Cruz ineligible to be president? Cruz was born in Canada to an American mother and a Cuban father. The Constitution says that only a “natural born citizen” can be president. Is Cruz a natural born citizen? (You may recall that before he attacked Cruz on this front, Trump spent months flogging a ludicrous version of this critique against President Obama, who was actually born in the United States, unlike Cruz.)

The words natural born citizen, and their original meaning at the time that this constitutional clause was crafted, go a long way to answering this question. In founding-era America, like today, a person could be a citizen by virtue of birth on American territory; a citizen by virtue of a statute that granted citizenship to him at birth; a “naturalized” citizen, meaning one who entered the country as an alien but later obtained citizenship via a process determined by law; and a foreigner.

A natural born citizen cannot be a foreigner. Foreigners are not citizens. A natural born citizen cannot be a person who was naturalized. Those people are not born citizens; they’re born aliens. Most important for the purposes of the Cruz question, a natural born citizen cannot be someone whose birth entitled him to citizenship because of a statute—in this case a statute that confers citizenship on a person born abroad to an American parent. In the 18th century, as now, the word natural meant “in the regular course of things.” Then, as now, almost all Americans obtained citizenship by birth in this country, not by birth to Americans abroad. The natural way to obtain citizenship, then, was (and is) by being born in this country. Because Cruz was not “natural born”—not born in the United States—he is ineligible for the presidency, under the most plausible interpretation of the Constitution.


TOPICS: Editorial; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Illinois; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: birther; birtherama; canadian; cruz; cruznbc; ericposner; ineligible; lies; tinfoilhat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 321-338 next last
To: for-q-clinton

When was that? The last I heard was he said he couldn’t pick Cruz unless it was settled first. As far as I know he still maintains it isn’t settled, which is true. The fact that you have bonafide experts arguing both sides clearly shows it’s not settled. I believe if Cruz were the nominee Democrat Secretaries of State in at least some swing states would refuse to put him on the ballot. Then Cruz would have to sue, and there is no way of knowing how it would be decided.

BTW, Trump saying he would consider something is his default answer. I could say I might consider moving to Iran. For about 2 seconds. So what? He could consider it and decide he can’t pick Cruz because of the birth issue.


141 posted on 02/10/2016 3:28:50 PM PST by Hugin ("First thing--get yourself a firearm!" Sheriff Ed Galt, Last Man St anding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Bidimus1

Yep. That law was designed to prevent the children of 18 year old draftees serving overseas from claiming citizenship.


142 posted on 02/10/2016 3:32:01 PM PST by Hugin ("First thing--get yourself a firearm!" Sheriff Ed Galt, Last Man St anding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: svcw

Cite the ruling.


143 posted on 02/10/2016 3:33:01 PM PST by Hugin ("First thing--get yourself a firearm!" Sheriff Ed Galt, Last Man St anding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: drewh

So says some un named chucklehead.


144 posted on 02/10/2016 3:34:34 PM PST by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bidimus1

I thought citizenship naturally passes via the mother’s blood. Now you tell me Congress can arbitrarily take the mother’s power away?


145 posted on 02/10/2016 3:34:45 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

The words of Article II, section I, clause 5 have not changed in any way since the constitution was adopted on June 01, 1788 nor have their meaning. Chester A. Arthur is irrelevant.


146 posted on 02/10/2016 3:41:34 PM PST by RC one ("...all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens" US v. WKA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
SCOTUS says ...

Bellei was not 'born * * * in the United States,' but he was, constitutionally speaking, 'naturalized in the United States.' Although those Americans who acquire their citizenship under statutes conferring citizenship on the foreignborn children of citizens are not popularly thought of as naturalized citizens, the use of the word 'naturalize' in this way has a considerable constitutional history. Congress is empowered by the Constitution to 'establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,' Art. I, S: 8. Anyone acquiring citizenship solely under the exercise of this power is, constitutionally speaking, a naturalized citizen.

147 posted on 02/10/2016 3:42:32 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: svcw

Well he walks around like the great Constitutionalist, this seems like just the opposite. Is he going to argue the Constitution does not apply to him?


148 posted on 02/10/2016 3:43:07 PM PST by bray (Trump/Palin 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

No
You trump supports are so smart, look it up or should I have said try and keep up.......you choose.


149 posted on 02/10/2016 3:44:00 PM PST by svcw (An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man is a subject)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot2

Title 8 Section 1401, established by act of Congress exercising it’s authority under Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution defines those who are citizens at birth and do not need to be naturalized, and are therefore naturally born as US citizens.


150 posted on 02/10/2016 3:45:24 PM PST by taxcontrol ( The GOPe treats the conservative base like slaves by taking their votes and refuses to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: bray

It does, and Cruz is a NBC b a use his mother is a citzen, just like trump is a NBC because his father was a citizen.
You trump supporters are really a one note group.


151 posted on 02/10/2016 3:45:40 PM PST by svcw (An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man is a subject)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: drewh
When an American woman gives birth to a child, regardless of whether on business, vacation or other, her child is an American, not a citizen of whatever country that mother gives birth!

My daughter gave birth to a son while working on assignment in Italy and lived there for three years

My grandson is not an Italian citizen nor has he ever been offered Italian citizenship!

My cousin's niece has been stationed in Germany for the Air Force. She met, fell in love with and married a fellow U. S. service member, who is not an American citizen.

Her baby (due in 6 months) will not be a German, nor will it be a citizen of Argentina (the Birth country of the expectant father) but will be an American citizen and has had that confirmed to her parents, who wondered after all Trump's pseudo "citizenship flap!"

152 posted on 02/10/2016 3:47:01 PM PST by zerosix (Native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

The other angle; was he a NATURALIZED citizen? No he wasn’t. As there is no other “3rd type” of citizen he must be considered a natural born citizen. There’s no in-between!!


153 posted on 02/10/2016 3:47:46 PM PST by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing consequences of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: svcw

Doesn’t take much to be smarter than you. You can’t cite them because they don’t exist. It’s moot anyway, Cruz won’t be the nominee for president or VP ever.


154 posted on 02/10/2016 3:47:46 PM PST by Hugin ("First thing--get yourself a firearm!" Sheriff Ed Galt, Last Man St anding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: svcw

I’ll never let this go and I have lost all respect for the so called conservatives that are wiping their a55es with the constitution for Ted Cruz simply because he out-Jesuses the rest of the candidates. I’ll never let it go.


155 posted on 02/10/2016 3:48:44 PM PST by RC one ("...all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens" US v. WKA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Bidimus1

Never said Eleanor Darragh Wilson Cruz was Cuban nor a migrant.


156 posted on 02/10/2016 3:48:47 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

That’s a pretty bold prediction.
The guy won’t be prime POTUS age for another 3-4 election cycles.


157 posted on 02/10/2016 3:49:06 PM PST by nascarnation (Indict Hillary, Huma, and Chelsea; Deport Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: svcw

Do you know the difference between citizen and Natural Born Citizen?


158 posted on 02/10/2016 3:49:52 PM PST by bray (Trump/Palin 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

The law is clear, and you are wrong. Don’t like it? Change the law...


159 posted on 02/10/2016 3:50:32 PM PST by Dead Corpse (A Psalm in napalm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: fuzzylogic

Correct...


160 posted on 02/10/2016 3:50:56 PM PST by Dead Corpse (A Psalm in napalm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 321-338 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson