Posted on 02/06/2016 7:52:31 AM PST by Kaslin
How many calories do you consume each day? If you answered something like "2,000" or "3,000," you're kidding yourself. You consume about 60 to 90 times that many.
True, you probably eat only 2,000 to 3,000 calories a day, but most of the calories you consume aren't from food. They're the energy you use when you turn on a light or computer, drive your car, use your cell phone, or do anything else requiring energy.
If you're like the average American, you consume about 186,000 calories a day, and over 98% of it is machine energy. It serves you, minute by minute, day by day, uncomplaining. It is largely responsible, because it powers everything that makes us healthier and safer, for the fact that Americans born today can expect to live about 80 years--compared with under 30 before the Industrial Revolution.
Very few--perhaps 1 in 100--of our ancestors consumed that much energy in a day--mostly in the form of animal and slave labor. The animals and slaves got all their energy from food. Now we get most of our energy from fossil fuels (about 87% worldwide), and most of the remainder from hydro (7%) and nuclear (4%), and only 2% from wind, solar, geothermal, biomass, and biofuels combined.
Harnessing energy through machines instead of animals and slaves enables us to benefit from a level of energy consumption that only a tiny minority had three centuries ago--even while abolishing slavery.
Today, however, environmentalists, and politicians like President Obama, call our use of fossil fuels an "addiction" analogous to drug abuse. They warn that we're causing dangerous global warming--though the computer models behind their claims predict two to three times the observed warming over the relevant period. They demand that we curtail our fossil fuel use--even stop it completely, even at a cost of trillions of dollars (over $100 trillion to eliminate fossil fuels by 2030) that we could use otherwise to reduce hunger and disease and increase housing, transportation, education, health care, and other benefits worldwide.
One might as well demand that someone cut his food intake from 2,000 calories a day to 300 because the other 1,700 are his "addiction." Abundant, affordable, reliable energy is indispensable to lifting and keeping whole societies out of poverty, and fossil fuels are and for decades to come will remain our best source.
Contrary to Green-sponsored myth, we can burn oil, natural gas, and coal to generate energy, as we do in America, without causing harmful pollution levels. The wealthier a society gets--partly by energy from fossil fuels--the more it reduces pollution. Poor countries where biomass remains the main cooking and heating fuel for some 2 billion people, causing 2 to 4 million premature deaths and hundreds of millions of respiratory illnesses annually, desperately need this cleaner, affordable upgrade.
Time to break our "addiction" to fossil fuels? Far from it! Time to spread their use throughout the developing world, lifting billions out of poverty and into healthier, longer lives.
No, I like staying warm and not freezing to death.
I like electricity and all the conveniences it brings.
I like being able to drive where I want, when I want.
My exhalations are not a dangerous pollutant.
CO2 has no bearing on temperature.
The Gore-Bull warming hoax is an excuse for global wealth redistribution. That’s all.
Let’s see how many Democrats line up to support Dear Leader’s dream of a $10 tax on every barrel of $30/bbl. oil, thus increasing the price of gasoline to the consumer, along with all petroleum products, such as plastic products, paint, fertilizer,medicine, cosmetics,carpeting, fabrics etc etc.
The Middle Class consumer would bear the higher cost of over 2000 products with petroleum as a base. Obama should be hounded and heckled when he comes up with such a destructive notion, but have you heard a single Republican comment on this? Too lazy and unconcerned to bother to challenge the loon in the White House.
Time to Break our 'Addiction' to Housing, Food, 365 Day Calendar, Oxygen?
Oh sure, why not.
No? explain
But that wouldn't enrich satan's lil helpers the slimes now would it?
The leftists call CO2 “pollution” in order to seize control of the economy.
No. It is time to stamp out liberalism.
If you want to live in a cave, sure why not
Do I have to? It is obvious. Or are you a envirowacko? Hope not. Haven’t you noticed that we have an abundance of fossil fuels? 90% of the talk against them are FUD. Why would you want to substitute something that costs more, takes more resources to produce, and creates less energy? Do you want to spend huge amounts to tax dollars furthering some one’s e3nergy scam? Do you want to drive the cost of absolutely everything so high that even trustfunders will squeal? Or do you just want change for change’s sake?
You are spot on but we have to face facts: Obama, the EPA, the courts, and even the GOPe have put the US and the Western world on maybe an irreversible path to renewable energy dependence. It is doable, but it will be hard to reverse the damage to energy production over the last seven years.
Without CO2 there wouldn't be any plants
Time to spread their use throughout the developing world, lifting billions out of poverty and into healthier, longer lives.
A voice of common sense crying in the wilderness
assuming they are “fossil fuels”
which is starting to look more and more dubious based on what we are finding on other plants
I can't even name all things all the things Fossil Fuels do to make modern society possible.
People were Mining Coal and using Asphalt 2,000 years ago.
It’s not an addiction, it’s the most efficient utilization of our natural resources. That’s why we keep using the stuff.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.