Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
I'll get behind this method of breaking one part of our addiction to fossil. The trouble for the extremists is that it won't set us back three hundred years in lifestyle - we'll keep advancing.
12 posted on 02/06/2016 8:13:23 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sgt_Schultze

While I do like the idea of thorium reactors, he does cherry pick in his arguments against uranium reactors. He ignores the pebble bed reactors which are the current state of the art (that remove most of his safety concerns), as well as breeder reactors which actually produce more fuel while running.

It is interesting to understand why we don’t have thorium reactors now. It wasn’t some conspiracy of the uranium miners or anything, it was a decision mostly by the U.S. government that we wanted a nuclear power infrastructure that supported the production of fissile material in case we needed it for making bombs.

I can certainly accept that decision in terms of national security calculations. However there’s little reason for not doing Thorium reactors now. It’s just that nuclear to the Greens is like a cross to a vampire, and I don’t see a way past that (short of a lot of people going up against a wall).


44 posted on 02/06/2016 9:53:15 AM PST by drbuzzard (All animals are created equal, but some are more equal than others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson