Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruz would consider restoring combat ban for women as president
Washington Examiner ^ | January 31, 2016 | Jacqueline Klimas

Posted on 02/02/2016 7:27:15 AM PST by huldah1776

Sen. Ted Cruz said he would reconsider opening all ground combat positions to women if elected the next commander in chief.

Cruz promised to take another look at the administration's decision late last year to open all positions to women. The administration's move ignored a request from the Marine Corps to keep some frontline combat positions male-only after some studies showed women were more likely to be injured and perform worse.

"The Marine Corps request [for exceptions] must be reconsidered," Cruz wrote in response to a Center for Military Readiness survey released Sunday. "As long as the requirements are fair and universally applied, the military must always place the best person for the job at hand, whether male or female, but we cannot let political correctness compel the military to lower its standards."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: combat; dod; infantry; military
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
I'm bothered by the "reconsider" term but I will trust those Cruz enlists to take over the DOD as being true to the constitution and to the boots. Women would have to pass the male requirements under the same standards in place now. Actually, have the standards been lowered within the last 40 years?
1 posted on 02/02/2016 7:27:15 AM PST by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

Women would have to pass the male requirements under the same standards in place now
___________________________________

well whatever they used to be...

I don’t think they can continue to ban women from applying for the jobs now that its been changed but as a veteran I think women should be held to the same high requirements..

AND not “helped” when they fail to meet and pass the tests..


2 posted on 02/02/2016 7:31:07 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776
"As long as the requirements are fair and universally applied, the military must always place the best person for the job at hand, whether male or female, but we cannot let political correctness compel the military to lower its standards."

This is the correct answer. A level playing field, no lowering of standards. But, that being said, two lone people in a foxhole, one male, one female, at a lonely outpost... I have issues with that.

3 posted on 02/02/2016 7:32:42 AM PST by Real Cynic No More (Border Fence Obamacare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776
"Reconsider?" WTF?

This and the border are the two most fundamentally important issues this election. Cruz needs to come down like a ton of bricks on both.

"Women would have to pass the male requirements under the same standards in place now."

I don't care if some genetically freakish girl can pass the male standards. Combat just isn't the place to put women. Period.

4 posted on 02/02/2016 7:33:23 AM PST by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Don't Tread On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

What has Trump said about this important question?


5 posted on 02/02/2016 7:35:20 AM PST by don-o (He will not share His glory. And He will NOT be mocked!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

nice promises

never gonna happen

this is not 1950 and wars are not fought like 1950

we are way technologically and socially past that point

women are not going back home

have we learned NOTHING about sitting Senators who give nice speeches and have a no track record of effective team building that accomplished any contentious goal?


6 posted on 02/02/2016 7:35:47 AM PST by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776
I don't care whether women are admitted to combat service or not. A battalion of anthrophobic lesbians might be just the weapon to crush the Islamonazis.

However, the Joint Chiefs of Staff should be the ones to decide who and what the military needs for the sole purpose of defending the U.S.A.

And the Joint Chiefs of Staff should be selected because of their ability, dedication, and above all their patriotism (and not whether they will deliver the military votes to Democrat politicians).

7 posted on 02/02/2016 7:36:28 AM PST by Savage Beast (The Trump Phenomenon is a Revolution. Actually a Counter-Revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

If a woman can survive through SEAL training without any special needs, then she should be a SEAL. It should be that way with any job in the military. If a woman can throw a 175 pound man over her shoulder and carry him out of danger, more power to her.


8 posted on 02/02/2016 7:36:45 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (The Trump/Cruz war is a media generated war so the establishment can stay in power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

yadda, yadda, yadda. I would’ve hoped that he’s past considering it, and it’s decisively what he would do, first day in office, executive order.


9 posted on 02/02/2016 7:37:40 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

Would consider... not good enough. And bow about homosexuals? I expect nothing to change until the US military is severely stressed in a major homeland defensive war situation.


10 posted on 02/02/2016 7:38:14 AM PST by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sono feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

“reconsider”

It’s women in combat

The actions Obama has taken with the military have been solely to destroy it. Anyone not totally cognizant of that is not fit to vote, much less run the country

Would reconsider. It’s not even will reconsider.

Wispiness. The fear of donors’ backlash. There is no way that will win against Hillary. She s not afraid of offending her donors they’re always on the same page. her voters don’t care they’re rhythm along with them destroying

Cruz cannot beat hillary


11 posted on 02/02/2016 7:38:21 AM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

My son (army) says yes.


12 posted on 02/02/2016 7:38:54 AM PST by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sono feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
If a woman can survive through SEAL training without any special needs, then she should be a SEAL. It should be that way with any job in the military. If a woman can throw a 175 pound man over her shoulder and carry him out of danger, more power to her.

Demi Moore did it!

13 posted on 02/02/2016 7:39:25 AM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Real Cynic No More

Then it really would be a fox hole wouldn’t it?


14 posted on 02/02/2016 7:40:58 AM PST by refermech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

There are reasons for that beyond physical strength and ability. Irsael discovered how it works and fixed it. They still train the women in arms so that should the battle come into Israel itself the women can defend their homes while their men are engaged in the field.


15 posted on 02/02/2016 7:41:30 AM PST by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sono feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

“Demi Moore did it!”

Yup. Hey, Rhonda Rousey was one of the Expendables. That has to count for something.


16 posted on 02/02/2016 7:41:30 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (The Trump/Cruz war is a media generated war so the establishment can stay in power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

Well, Cruz will not have to worry about that decision. He won’t be President.


17 posted on 02/02/2016 7:42:14 AM PST by jokemoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

Women have no business being in combat. They also have no business being in certain careers such as firefighting. Paid fire departments such as New York City lower their physical agility standards to allow women into the department. This is wrong and is dangerous to their fellow fire fighter brothers and the public that they take an oath to serve and protect. If a woman can pass the physical agility standards the same as a man, then by all means, she should be given the job. In the past 30 years, women have been hired into police and fire departments by judicial fiat, not by fair standards.


18 posted on 02/02/2016 7:42:54 AM PST by NoKoolAidforMe (I'm clinging to my God and my guns. You can keep the change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Real Cynic No More

two lone people in a foxhole, one male, one female, at a lonely outpost... I have issues with that.

Why...? In today’s military, those two would no doubt be homosexual, and problem solved...


19 posted on 02/02/2016 7:45:25 AM PST by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

Why change it?

Women want to be “equal”, then let them be in all-female units.

And they have to sign up for selective services.


20 posted on 02/02/2016 7:45:30 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson