Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton for the Democratic Nomination
New York Times ^

Posted on 01/30/2016 9:13:01 AM PST by Sub-Driver

Hillary Clinton for the Democratic Nomination The Editorial Board

For the past painful year, the Republican presidential contenders have been bombarding Americans with empty propaganda slogans and competing, bizarrely, to present themselves as the least experienced person for the most important elected job in the world. Democratic primary voters, on the other hand, after a substantive debate over real issues, have the chance to nominate one of the most broadly and deeply qualified presidential candidates in modern history.

Hillary Clinton would be the first woman nominated by a major party. She served as a senator from a major state (New York) and as secretary of state — not to mention her experience on the national stage as first lady with her brilliant and flawed husband, President Bill Clinton. The Times editorial board has endorsed her three times for federal office — twice for Senate and once in the 2008 Democratic presidential primary — and is doing so again with confidence and enthusiasm.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Russia; US: Arkansas; US: New York; US: South Carolina; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2016election; arkansas; benghazi; blackberry; canada; clintoncash; clintonfoundation; demagogicparty; districtofcolumbia; election2016; hillary; hillaryclinton; hitlery; humaabedin; iran; libya; memebuilding; newyork; pages; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; peterschweizer; russia; southcarolina; treygowdy; uranium; waronterror; washingtoncompost; washingtonpost; wipewater
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Sub-Driver

The Clinton Legacy continues:


21 posted on 01/30/2016 9:40:47 AM PST by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Hillary Clinton would be the first woman nominated by a major party.

Slam! Instant winner! Who needs any more reason than that? Everything after that in the article is just blah, blah, blah.

Really, there must be one or two secrets the country has that some foreign enemy must want.

22 posted on 01/30/2016 9:40:47 AM PST by seowulf (Cogito cogito, ergo cogito sum. Cogito.---Ambrose Bierce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Hillary Clinton would be the first woman nominated by a major party.

The first woman - first quisling - first person convicted of espionage... "Firsts" are important to the New York Times because they measure their worth in prizes, not 'readers who trust them'...

23 posted on 01/30/2016 9:44:27 AM PST by GOPJ (If the FBI was investigating Cruz for espionage could Rubio call off the press like Sanders did?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

24 posted on 01/30/2016 9:45:09 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

At least she’s never had the opportunity to catch VD from her husband.


25 posted on 01/30/2016 9:45:16 AM PST by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda; moovova
Hillary Clinton would be the first woman nominated by a major party.

The first woman - first quisling - first person convicted of espionage... "Firsts" are important to the New York Times because they measure their worth in prizes, not 'readers who trust them'...

26 posted on 01/30/2016 9:46:07 AM PST by GOPJ (If the FBI was investigating Cruz for espionage could Rubio call off the press like Sanders did?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

27 posted on 01/30/2016 9:46:47 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Vying for who can give away the most “free” stuff is “...substantive debate over real issues...”?


28 posted on 01/30/2016 9:50:26 AM PST by Rinnwald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
bombarding Americans with empty propaganda slogans and competing, bizarrely, to present themselves as the least experienced person for the most important elected job in the world

I do not remember the NYT using this entirely appropriate phrase to describe the least experienced person to ever occupy our White House - eight years ago when they were getting tingles up their leg over the brilliance of the smartest man ever to permit us to worship him.

29 posted on 01/30/2016 9:56:21 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“...the Republican presidential contenders have been bombarding Americans with empty propaganda slogans...”

You mean like “Hillary for America”? LOL! Right—she is. Is her bank account called “America”?


30 posted on 01/30/2016 10:07:35 AM PST by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

not directly, anyways...

:-/


31 posted on 01/30/2016 10:08:26 AM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BeRight
I still say they will draft Biden before the Democrat Convention.

My guess also.

The longer before Hillary drops out, the shorter the time there is to focus on Biden's mental problems.


32 posted on 01/30/2016 10:11:38 AM PST by Sooth2222 ("In a democracy, the people get the government they deserve." - Alexis de Tocqueville (1805-1859))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Discussion on another thread about 0bola pardoning PIAPS got me to thinking about how likely that might be.

My first thought is that 0bola will not offer a pardon this early in the process. He would have to issue hundreds of pardons to get far enough away from Hillary to make this go away. Even that carries its own set of problems. Hillary can't accept a pardon and stay in the race.

Why is she being pardoned before a trial? EXACTLY what did she do that requires a pardon? She has consistently denied having done anything wrong.

Now that I think about it, The 0bolas and their staffs really don't like the Clintons and don't want them back in the White House. This would make 0bola hesitant to do anything to protect her from prosecution. There is then the matter of the famed Clinton opposition research file. They are supposed to have quite a bit of major dirt on 0bola that I am sure he doesn't want revealed. Hillary can dangle this over his head while telling him that he damn well better make this go away. There is only so much 0bola can do without exposing himself to future criminal prosecution for Obstruction of Justice.

Offering Hillary a pardon after the FBI recommends prosecution might kill two birds with one stone. Just the offer of a pardon would place her in an untenable position.

Does she accept the pardon and make the legal problems go away or does she fight and risk serious prison time? She won't get a second shot at a pardon.

If she accepts the pardon she takes on another freight train worth of political baggage. Either way she takes major political damage that she can't afford to take.

"Ceterum censeo 0bama esse delendam."

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

33 posted on 01/30/2016 10:31:34 AM PST by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ...
For the past painful year, the Republican presidential contenders have been bombarding Americans with empty propaganda slogans and competing, bizarrely, to present themselves as the least experienced person for the most important elected job in the world. Democratic primary voters, on the other hand, after a substantive debate over real issues, have the chance to nominate one of the most broadly and deeply qualified presidential candidates in modern history.
The Slimes would be laughable if it weren't so sad.


34 posted on 01/30/2016 11:05:23 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson