Posted on 01/30/2016 4:43:51 AM PST by RoosterRedux
In fact, the White House refused to invite him when hosting muslim events even though he was a lieutenant commander in the United States Navy (as a surgeon).
Not much difference...frightening...
I agree that deradicalizing them is not possible or effective in the long run.
I would define it that way, but the world doesn't revolve around how I define things. It HAS been defined as a religion for quite some time, so it's doubtful you'll be able to convince people that suddenly it's not.
Kick the foreign ones out of the country and shoot the home grown ones that come after you.
That's about the only solution I can see at this point.
ping
Thank you. Very interesting.
My father-in-law was a chaplain at a maximum-security prison for years. He also said that the mentality which resulted in the crimes in the first place matches closely the mentality of Islam, which is why there are so many who convert to Islam in prisons. One of the strategies to deal with this was to withhold items they wanted for their “worship”, but because Islam is thought of as a religion rather than as a cult or political ideology, that tactic has been attacked when dealing with violent terrorists.
Ultimately the item she says has the most success is for a country to simply make it so difficult to live the way Muslims want to live, that they choose not to live in that country. That would probably spare the most lives.
My sister did personal discipleship with a woman who had converted to Islam and then left it after she had been abused by her Muslim husband. These psychological characteristics were passed on to this woman in just the short time that she professed Islam. I guess any ideology that makes excuses for abuse has a psychological pathology that goes along with it.
The allies killed plenty of Nazis and banned the “religion.” It can be done here as well. It’s not up to us as individuals, it’s up to proper governance. It’s why we must put somebody willing to say and do the things that need to be done. No more Bushes claiming “It’s a religion of peace!”
Thank you for the additional related to this article.
The doctor is really sticking out his neck professionally and personally.
There are topics that the pychological field , and others dare not to raise.
And I imagine any popular “underdog” cultural group can protest inference that it’s identity is a result of abnormal psychological programming.
Black lives matter = entitled victim hood mentality
Homosexuals = deviant-fixation & self-loathing
Muslims = violent self-righteous, dominance & control
I hope he keeps up the good work, others jump in and do likewise, and that he is kept safe from Muslims who resent their religion being considered the cause of violent mental illness.
RE: “The psychologist/author is a Dane who works in a Danish prison which houses mostly muslim youths. In Denmark, muslims represent only about 5% of the population, but commit 70% of the crimes.”
“But how to make a violent Muslim peaceful?”
Kill the Muslim.
History is replete with examples of the disaster visited upon any who came under the authority of a Muslim.
True for nations - ask the Spanish.
True for individuals - ask a woman who married a Muslim.
This is really good stuff. Thanks for posting.
Excellent points!
Speaking of which, Japan recently came up in discussion as to why they don’t have problems with radical Muslims.
The simple fact is: they don’t permit Muslim immigration to their country...
RE: “Ultimately the item she says has the most success is for a country to simply make it so difficult to live the way Muslims want to live, that they choose not to live in that country. That would probably spare the most lives.”
“You must define islam as a political ideology - not a religion.”
Exactly! After that is accomplished, the solution is easier.
Nazism was not a religion, a fact you're apparently aware of since you placed it in quotes.
Confounding the two to try to make your point does nothing to deter from the fact religions are protected by the Constitution....which is NOT a document to be ignored at one's convenience.
Bingo.
Freedom of RELIGION is protected. Practicing a THEOCRACY which itself includes eliminating anything that it disagrees with (including our own Constitution) is NOT protected in the United States of America.
You do understand that Islam is a THEOCRACY that seeks to undermine and replace governments around the world don't you?
Or is that something you have not developed an understanding of yet?
Well of course I do. Don't talk down to me as if I were a child.
Or is that something you have not developed an understanding of yet?
And do you understand - THE CONSTITUTION IS NOT TO BE DISCARDED SIMPLY BECAUSE YOU FIND IT INCONVENIENT?
You either adhere to it...TOTALLY, or it becomes meaningless.
How about them having to grow up watching their mothers abused?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.