Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RNC cuts debate ties with conservative magazine over anti-Trump issue
Fox News ^ | January 22, 2016 | Fox News

Posted on 01/22/2016 1:50:49 AM PST by WhiskeyX

The Republican National Committee announced late Thursday that the venerable conservative magazine National Review had been dropped as a debate sponsor after it published an issue devoted to why voters should reject Donald Trump's presidential campaign.

RNC spokesman Sean Spicer confirmed to Buzzfeed News that the magazine had been dropped as a sponsor of the Feb. 25 debate in Houston, saying "a debate moderator can't have a predisposition."

"We expected this was coming," National Review publisher Jack Fowler wrote in a blog post early Friday, calling the RNC move a "small price to pay for speaking the truth about The Donald."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; cnsrvtvtreehouse; conservatism; election2016; erickerickson; glennbeck; marklevin; megynkelly; nationalreview; newyork; pinkstain; pinkstate; politico; redstate; redstategathering; rnc; rogerailes; sundance; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

1 posted on 01/22/2016 1:50:49 AM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

The debate would have given NR an audience of millions. Their “special edition” ragazine, not so much. Dopes.


2 posted on 01/22/2016 2:03:12 AM PST by patq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX
National Review wants a President who 'fits in rooms that smell of old leather and cigars - - someone who will muse with them about conservative philosophy and the future.

Conservative elites don't give a damn about what happens in the country to everyday Americans. Well, except in the abstract - as a form of entertainment.

3 posted on 01/22/2016 2:05:25 AM PST by GOPJ (It's more important to have a gun in your hand than a cop on the phone- Florida Sheriff Grady Judd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patq

I’m going to vote for Cruz, but firing NR over what they did was spot on.

They are about as impartial as Megynnnnnn, Candy and little Georgie Staphlococcus.


4 posted on 01/22/2016 2:05:51 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

Very interesting. Thanks for posting.


5 posted on 01/22/2016 2:07:43 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

NRO. Venerable? Lmao


6 posted on 01/22/2016 2:09:01 AM PST by stocksthatgoup (how many laws has Cruz sponsored that have become law?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
NR is a subversive organization, working to undermine the constitution. It is part of the panoply of superficially "opposing" voices that lead the casual observer to think the politics of this country produces some kind of meaning choice, when the fact of the matter is that all of the professional politicians are NWO types, or NWO dupes.

Frankly, I'm surprised the RNC is making this move. I suppose it has a purpose, the RNC/GOPe can point to this action as evidence that it is not subversive of the US constitution, although Certifying Cruz as qualified gives them away as being just as duplicitous (and in fact more dangerous) than NR.

7 posted on 01/22/2016 2:12:03 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

It’ll be interesting if there’s a drop in National Review’s quarterly subscription numbers.


8 posted on 01/22/2016 2:12:08 AM PST by existentially_kuffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

hey whiskey. Always like your threads. Did the RNC get courage?


9 posted on 01/22/2016 2:12:50 AM PST by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

you don’t like cruz? I happen to like both. How come you don’t like him if it’s any of my business? :)


10 posted on 01/22/2016 2:14:45 AM PST by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: patq

Just went over to their website. Sure enough. It’s full of articles by Glenn Beck, Thomas Sowell and the Editors all negative for Trump, and really nothing to say about anyone else.

WOW!!!

This used to be a mainstay read for me, esp Thomas Sowell. It’s now a source for intellectual waste.

But I’m thinking why now? Why print this now?

I am gleefully taking them off my “favorite” site...In fact, I haven’t really liked them since they changed their format which is all to complicated to maneuver through. I liked their old format.

NRO with Glenn Beck?

BaBye...


11 posted on 01/22/2016 2:15:25 AM PST by nikos1121 (December 25, 2016 will be the merriest Christmas of all for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: existentially_kuffer

although I like Ted and Donald, I stopped reading National Review after they kept beating up on Donald. I’m from New York City and I don’t know if he’s the real deal or not, but he can’t be dismissed. that being said I wish he hadn’t switched parties so many times or made so many statements in the past that were not quite conservative. We shall see what happens.


12 posted on 01/22/2016 2:17:00 AM PST by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

The RNC is facing the same problem as the grassroot voters have in the past, the lesser of two weevils....


13 posted on 01/22/2016 2:17:14 AM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

The National Review = The Estbalishment/Globalist/Uniparty Review


14 posted on 01/22/2016 2:18:48 AM PST by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

Well........Bye.


15 posted on 01/22/2016 2:19:51 AM PST by McGruff (You stay classy Trump haters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

I don’t think it’s so much ‘lesser of...’, but rather a case of money and a case of hedging their bets.

Trump likely would have dropped out of the debate. That’s what I would have done. The leader doesn’t really actually gain much by opening himself up as a target, and he’s had enough debates to say he isn’t chicken. Losing Trump would have cost the RNC money in what they’re going to get paid from the networks who host it. And by giving Trump and his supporters another issue to browbeat ‘the establishment’ it wouldn’t have increased their stock with the voters any.


16 posted on 01/22/2016 2:26:16 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dp0622
My mind isn't made up on Cruz, on a question of fundamental character.

He's not qualified for the office. He knows he is not qualified, nobody foreign-born is qualified. That the public doesn't know this is a mystery to me, "flat earth society" level mystery. This is a "reverse-birther" distinction in my mind. One has to be a kook to believe that Cruz is qualified.

The RNC (which was the subject of my remarks) knows Cruz is not qualified, but it chose to participate in an illegal and immoral act, subversive of the constitution, by certifying Cruz as eligible and allowing him to appear on primary ballots in the several states.

Maybe this sin is undertaken with a greater good in mind, teaching the public the meaning of "natural born Citizen." And so, until events lay out, I withhold my ultimate judgment on Cruz.

I like his politics.

17 posted on 01/22/2016 2:26:22 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

To answer your Q to another poster. I have come to not like him as much as I did when this started. He lacks wisdom. My 70 year old mother started out pointing out why she did not trust him at all. I thought he was great. She told me, mark my words, that man is a snake. I watched. He was set to be VP, even faked mutual support and pretended to not mind being second. Doesn’t have the charisma to win this time around. I got that. Then attacks Trump. Trump attacks back, harder... a lot harder. Idiot ruined his chances for VP and POTUS after that. You don’t pull a tigers tail when old ladies think you are a snake. They cheer on the carnage that follows. I still like him, but he is too smart for his own good. It bit him in the ass hard core. He will be lucky to keep his senate seat after this is all over. His snake bit him, and I am afraid career wise, mortally.


18 posted on 01/22/2016 2:29:33 AM PST by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (God punishes Conservatives by making them argue with fools: Go Trump! Fireside brothers for Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: WhiskeyX

Thank you RNC for standing with the people on this one.


20 posted on 01/22/2016 2:32:28 AM PST by jokemoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson