How do they explain the dude in the White House???
I’m not ready to accept that premise.
Can a black hole explode?
Amazing how much scientists can infer about things which are often millions of light years away!
Such certainty!
Such magnificent wisdom!
Which do we worship, their magnificent discoveries or the magnificence of the discoverers? Their prognostications about all subjects are always TRUTH!, right?
They are SCIENTISTS!!! after all!
/SARC
Not sure I get what the contradiction is supposed to be. By conventional black hole theory, matter that falls down the hole emits radiation as a result of being torn apart by the extreme gravity gradient. Is something being seen that does not conform to that theory either?
Is this Muslim outreach?
This is never going to be “settled science” like Global Warming or Evolution. There are too many questions here.
Studies show that the lack of black holes are caused by universal climate change./s
Here’s how it all works. Each black hole sucks up the light matter and dark matter in its vicinity. When all of that is consumed the black holes search out more food and start to consume each other. The dark energy binds all of the black holes together. But when all of the black holes have been consumed it leaves just one “big” black hole with all the light matter, dark matter, and dark energy inside. At some point it gets indigestion and regurgitates all of that matter and energy, thus creating a new universe. Gamma rays spouting from black holes is just a burp. Trust me, I’m a scientist.
Dude flip flops on positions more than a Congressman!
And Hawking didn't say black holes don't exist.
“flare” is what a stellar object emits in outer space. “flair” is what servers have to wear 37 pieces of in Office Space. Dammit, grammar, people!
Please! This is as settled science as global warming!
#BlackHolesMatter
>> Mitra was earlier the head of theoretical astrophysics at the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre in Mumbai and currently Adjunct Professor at the Homi Bhabha National Institute. <<
Adjunct = teaches a few courses for next to nothing. (It’s an affront to decency that such positions exist in all but the smallest universities.) If he had any prestige left, they’d call him a “visiting professor.” I wonder why the calamitous fall from grace.
Well, I can’t speak for the math at all, but this makes a lot of sense to a layman:
Eternally Collapsing Objects[edit]
Though Mitra stresses that the `Black Hole’’ solutions are correct, his contention is that Black Hole masses, arising from relevant integration constants, are actually zero. His peer reviewed paper published in Journal of Mathematical Physics of the American Institute of Physics supports this contention by showing that Schwarzschild black holes have M = 0.[29] If so,
(i) The so-called massive Black Hole Candidates (BHCs) must be quasi-black holes rather than exact black holes and
(ii) During preceding gravitational collapse, entire mass energy and angular momentum of the collapsing objects must be radiated away before formation of exact mathematical black holes.
And since the formation of a mathematical zero mass black hole requires infinite proper time, continued gravitational collapse becomes eternal, and the so-called black hole candidates must be Eternally Collapsing Objects (ECO).[30][31][32][33] Mitra’s peer reviewed papers describe why continued physical gravitational collapse should lead to formation of ECOs rather than true black holes, and the mathematical ``black hole’’ states can be achieved only asymptotically.[34][35][36][37][38] An ECO is essentially a quasi-stable ultra-compact ball of fire (plasma) which is so hot due to preceding gravitational contraction that its outward radiation pressure balances its inward pull of gravity. Some astrophysicists[39][40][41][42][43] claimed to have verified this prediction that astrophysical Black Hole Candidates are actually ECOs rather than true mathematical black holes. The corresponding Harvard University Press Release[44] acknowledges Mitra’s original contribution in this context.
In 2014, soon after Stephen Hawking called the alleged loss of information in black holes his “biggest blunder”,[45] Mitra received widespread attention in the Indian media, claiming that he had been ‘vindicated’ [46][47][48] citing that he had apparently refuted Hawking and indicated the same almost 13 years back. [49] [50] [51] [52] [53]
Against the Big Bang Paradigm[edit]
As per the present version of Big Bang Paradigm, almost 70% of the mass energy of the universe is due to ``Dark Energy’’ whose most likely form is Einstein’s Cosmological Constant. But Mitra’s research has shown that Cosmological Constant is exactly zero as suspected by many.[54][55][56][57] In addition, these papers point out that as per cosmological observations, the actual universe is far more complex than the idealised perfect ``isotropy and homogeneity’’ assumed by the Big Bang model; and ``Dark Energy’’ is an illusion caused by such departures.
As per his recent research, a Big Bang universe can expand only linearly[58][59] so that popular inflationary and cyclic models are actually inconsistent.
Since perfect Hubble flow implies radially outward motion of test particles receding from one another without any mutual collision, his research claimed to show that ideal Big Bang model corresponds to nil pressure and temperature. If correct, this implies that the ideal Big Bang model is fundamentally unable to describe the physical universe endowed with pressure and temperature.[60][61]
He has also questioned the physical reality of dark energy.[62]
I am getting sick of this. First, it was “Pluto isn’t a planet” and now its “no such thing as black holes” ... Hey scientists: Stop screwing around with the universe!!!
But I saw on Stargate Atlantis that they created a Black hole to kill all the Replicators. Are you saying that Television lied to me?