Posted on 11/23/2015 4:57:09 PM PST by Kaslin
Obamacare's menu labeling regulation promises to be a disaster for the food and restaurant industries, as its implementation is both costly and extremely onerous. While its deleterious effects on the pizza, restaurant, and grocery industries have been most well known, it also has the potential to shutter an industry near and dear to Americans' hearts: craft beer.
Since beer has a few too many calories for bureaucrats, the health law dictates that all brewers include a detailed calorie count on every type of beer produced. Failure to do so, according to Americans for Tax Reform, "means craft brewers will not be able to sell their beer in any restaurant chain with over 20 locations."
The Cato Institute estimates the Obamacare calorie labeling requirements will cost a business as much as $77,000 to implement. For larger beer companies, this is a drop in the bucket, but for small, local craft brewers it represents a substantial cost that they must pay. As a result, it creates a significant disadvantage compared to larger beer companies who can better absorb the cost of this new regulation.
According to Bart Watson, chief economist of the Brewers Association, "Most of the new [craft beer] entrants continue to be small and local, operating in neighborhoods or towns. What it means to be a brewery is shifting, back toward an era when breweries were largely local, and operated as a neighborhood bar or restaurant." The increasingly small size of craft breweries means they are faced with a tough decision in light of the impending regulations: cut costs and possibly lay off workers to pay for the calorie labels, or be shut out of one of the most profitable markets for their product. Either way, it is a lose - lose situation for the craft beer brewers and drinkers, an industry that grew 27.8 percent from 2013 to 2014 when it was left alone.
The most ridiculous part about the entire regulation is that menu labeling has little to no effect on consumers' purchasing choices, and studies demonstrating that menu labeling is linked to a reduction in obesity rates, the supposed benefit the FDA used to justify the regulation in the first place, doesn't exist.
2,224 new regulations this week:
http://dailycaller.com/2015/11/23/obama-quietly-releases-plans-for-2224-regs-ahead-of-turkey-day/
One has to also consider how that cost is distributed amongst the products. A small batch brewery with multiple beer types, the cost will be excessive.
This is another law whose repercussions were not considered. Why not have one calorie label for each general beer type (lager, ale, stout, etc.) and state: "Actual calorie count is estimated based on alcohol content"
Yes, yes, no label for calories is preferred, but that argument has been lost.
Im thinking that the family discounts. may have driven him to excess
Coors Lite is referred to around here as ‘Barley Pop’.
The calorie count should be reported as a range, like politicians wealth and income are reported.
Example: “Nancy Pelosi’s income was between $5 and 25 million in 2014”.
“The calories in this ale are between 5 and 5,000 per 12 ounces.”
It’s only fair...
Bud is upset as craft breweries have been making inroads and taking away market share from the bigs and the big breweries have in the past done everything they could to blunt craft breweries. As they will in the future. And how? By bribing officials like state senators like they’ve done here in Florida.
No sane growler sizes, no growlers if food served etc.
Has bud bribed obammy?
Haram means forbidden ....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.