Posted on 10/22/2015 6:42:33 AM PDT by rktman
The gun control movement has become the new feminist battleground. Courtesy of millions of dollars flowing from Michael Bloomberg to women-fronted groups, the face of "gun control" is now decidedly female. Feminization of the issue is not by happenstance. It is a deliberate strategy designed to appeal to gender voters, to beta males, to those who make decisions based on emotion rather than fact, and to those who are ill-informed but know what is best for all. If this movement is successful, the consequences will be tragic and deadly -- especially for women. Women who choose to arm for self-protection in an increasingly dangerous society will be denied that right and instead, will be forced to become easy prey and crime statistics. Make no mistake: gun control is the real war on women and civilian disarmament is the goal. Michael Bloomberg has endorsed gun confiscation and Hillary Clinton is onboard. That women are the vanguard of an effort to make all women weak, dependent submissives is a stunning repudiation of feminism's supposed foundational principle: a woman has the right to make her own life choices.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Lead by example, comrades. Disarm your bodyguards.
Or are some pigs more equal than others and therefore have to have armed protection?
Yes, by all means, disarm the women.
Guns? What guns?
I don’t have any guns.
This is why they have never been allowed to vote.
LMAO...remember people, ammo is getting expensive, so I won’t be giving a warning shot!!!
“The women’s suffrage movement is only the small edge of the wedge, if we allow women to vote it will mean the loss of social structure and the rise of every liberal cause under the sun. Women are well represented by their fathers, brothers, and husbands.”
- Winston Churchill
Is Bloomberg saying he wants to disarm all women??
As well as black youts as mentioned at the ass-pen institute meeting a while back. “I never said that!”
I agree 100%.
Disarm the women and make things equal between a 110 pound woman and a 225 pound rapist.
I’m sure most of you have heard about the local women (to me, anyway) who bit of the tongue of a 16 yr old rapist..
My first thought was that if she had a gun, it wouldn’t have come to him touching her. Living in North Charleston is a health hazard as it is with all the drugs and crime.
I got over my fear of guns years ago. And I am armed at home. Armed when I have to go outside of home. I am trained, I’m not at another persons mercy. I am an empowered women.
I watched an AMAZING documentary on Churchill yesterday. He was attacked by a group of sufferagettes outside of his car one day. His wife, Clemmie, beat them with an umbrella to protect him. How ironic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.