Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gov. Brown to Sign Landmark Renewable Energy Law Wednesday
Times of San Diego ^ | 10/7/2915 | City News Service

Posted on 10/07/2015 9:02:41 AM PDT by EagleUSA

Gov. Jerry Brown will visit Griffith Observatory in Los Angeles Wednesday to sign legislation mandating that half of the state’s electricity come from renewable sources by 2030.

The ambitious mandates of SB 350, championed by Senate President pro tem Kevin de Leon of Los Angeles, were outlined by Brown in his inaugural address in January. But de Leon’s legislation was significantly watered down last month in the state Assembly, which stripped away a requirement that the state slash its gasoline use by 50 percent in the next 15 years.

That provision sparked heated debate in Sacramento, thanks to opposition from the oil industry and concerns from some Democrats who feared possible economic fallout from the move.

Despite the loss of the gasoline provision, de Leon said the legislation still includes steps that “build on California’s historic commitment to lead the world in the fight against climate change and build a healthy and livable planet for our children and grandchildren.

(Excerpt) Read more at timesofsandiego.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: california; cronyism; fraud; money; scam
Here we go. More liberal, big money, cronyism. California already has the HIGHEST energy rates in the US...30% higher. Now Brown, and his cronies, want to raise it even more. Great example of what a Uni-Party, Democrat-run state is willing to do to its economy and its people for BIG MONEY for a few....eg Bloomberg heavily invested in renewable energy. Huge loser for everyone except the stock holders.
1 posted on 10/07/2015 9:02:41 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

How about renewable WATER?


2 posted on 10/07/2015 9:05:10 AM PDT by Slyfox (Will no one rid us of this meddlesome president?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
Gov. Jerry Brown will visit Griffith Observatory in Los Angeles Wednesday to sign legislation mandating that half of the state’s electricity come from renewable sources by 2030.

The headline should read:
"Governor Brown changes laws of physics"

3 posted on 10/07/2015 9:05:18 AM PDT by Popman (Christ alone: My Cornerstone...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Stop the foolishness. Spend the money on desalinization. That’s your real problem and necessary for survival.


4 posted on 10/07/2015 9:05:40 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

So who will be the “Enron” they can blame when these chickens come home to roost in CA like the last time he signed one of theses decrees in 1979?


5 posted on 10/07/2015 9:07:47 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Seems too many voters in our lovely State have a passion for Democrackpots.


6 posted on 10/07/2015 9:08:26 AM PDT by rockinqsranch ((Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

It’s not about survival, it is about crushing America for a New World Order. Planet wide socialism.


7 posted on 10/07/2015 9:08:48 AM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Moonbeam and aRnie will be long gone but their damage will linger for generations.

The lines will be long for those who would piss on their graves.


8 posted on 10/07/2015 9:18:48 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (SEMPER FI!! - Monthly Donors Rock!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Free Republic’s “favorite” candidate supports the anti free market renewable fuel standards and ethanol subsidies so this shouldn’t be an issue.


9 posted on 10/07/2015 9:19:29 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

At least the last business to leave won’t have to turn off the lights.


10 posted on 10/07/2015 9:19:38 AM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Trying to make California so expensive that the few remaining taxpaying normal people will be forced out.


11 posted on 10/07/2015 9:21:41 AM PDT by Iron Munro (The wise have stores of choice food and oil but a foolish man devours all he has. Proverbs 21:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

“Gov. Brown to Sign Landmark Renewable Energy Law Wednesday”

It will be difficult to watch, but events are going to grind California’s economy - and many of the people that remain in the state - into pieces.


12 posted on 10/07/2015 9:23:00 AM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

I feel bad for the normal, intelligent (and conservative) people who live in California. These stupid, liberal scumbags are going to drag them under the water just as surely as if they had tied a millstone around their necks.

Look at the stupid libtards in Europe (and in Vermont) who set these idiotic, stupid, unrealistic, unreachable, unattainable, and in the end, impossible standards.

They think that if they write a law, it will somehow FORCE them (and all the unwilling peasants who either don’t have a clue, or the enemies of the state who outright opine that those goals are unrealistic and/or impossible.

But liberals have this unshakable belief that if you don’t make a goal, you can’t reach it. They have no problem making an impossible goal and not reaching it. Conservatives believe that making a reachable goal, even a difficult one to reach, is far preferable from a human nature perspective. You get more done, and get it done constructively with a sense of accomplishment, not failure.


13 posted on 10/07/2015 9:24:50 AM PDT by rlmorel ("National success by the Democratic Party equals irretrievable ruin." Ulysses S. Grant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

The Lord of the Flies wanders into energy policy.

Does the phrase “Necessarily Skyrocket” sound familiar?


14 posted on 10/07/2015 9:32:12 AM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

I mentioned Vermont in my post, because while it is a gorgeous state, it is largely run by raging liberals, even though there still exist independent conservative folks there.

Back in 2011, Vermont decided that 90 percent of all energy used in the state ­— including electricity, transportation and building heating — will be provided from renewable sources by 2050.

Can’t be done.

The icing on this liberal wet-dream is that Vermont has had to purchase power generated by nuclear power from outside their borders, which makes the liberals heads explode.

I read a blog at vermontdigger.org that put it this way:
*******************************************************
Right now, Vermont uses 6,000 Gigawatt hours (GWh) of electricity per year. (A GWh is a million kilowatt hours.) My estimate is that Vermont would need 18,000 GWh annually to achieve the 90 percent goal by switching to electric cars, heat pumps and so forth. That’s an outrageously big number, but it coincides with two other rough calculations I’ve seen from renewable advocates. In a recent op-ed, Charles McKenna, a local Sierra Club member, estimated the state would need 15,000 GWh in order to achieve the 90% renewable goal. In a recent Green Energy Times, David Blittersdorf, a renewable developer, said that the 90 percent goal will require three times the electricity we use now. (Three times 6,000 is 18,000.)

To put this number in perspective, consider that Vermont currently buys approximately 2,000 GWh from Hydro-Quebec. This is about a third of our current electricity demand, but it would be only a small fraction of the electricity needed for a 90 percent renewable goal.

Adopting an unrealistic, over-arching energy plan that calls for almost all energy to come from renewable sources essentially confers a blessing on all proposed renewable projects. Every project advances the “plan.”
I did another rough set of calculations to estimate how many wind turbines, biomass plants, solar panels and so forth would be needed to generate 18,000 GWh of electricity. The results are appalling. For example, making 18,000 GWh using wind turbines would take about 2,000 turbines, covering 400 to 700 miles of ridgeline. Vermont is only 160 miles long. Making the same amount of electricity from biomass would require 12 million acres of woodlands, sustainably harvested. That’s twice the size of Vermont.
*******************************************************

That is pretty funny. Of course, the calculations might be off, but...I would bet they are closer to the truth than the people who want to be all renewable by 2050.


15 posted on 10/07/2015 9:36:58 AM PDT by rlmorel ("National success by the Democratic Party equals irretrievable ruin." Ulysses S. Grant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

the Bigun that destroys LA will facilitate the % changes for electricity usage in the state


16 posted on 10/07/2015 9:37:24 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ....carson is the kinder gentler trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

That giant sucking sound is the sound of employers leaving Californai.


17 posted on 10/07/2015 9:40:21 AM PDT by rcofdayton (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Popman

The headline should read:
“Governor Brown changes laws of physics”

I was thinking the same thing. Perhaps the legislature will next modify the gravitational constant.


18 posted on 10/07/2015 9:45:04 AM PDT by MRadtke (Light a candle or curse the darkness?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Because THEY never have to live within their own edicts/Laws...

THEY don’t drive themselves, (rarely) arm themselves, feed themselves, etc.

Notice they never target vs. sq. footage? That would get nipped in the bud 1st hour it was brought up.


19 posted on 10/07/2015 9:49:06 AM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Well, it really is not about liberal stupidity but more for the ongoing modus operandi and the liberal mafia STEALING money from the public. The idea is to build unaffordable power generation equipment (solar mainly) and profit from it. And the secondary industry of natural gas backup systems which are required and greatly in favor of the big power providers like PG&E here and the others.

It really is a scam upon the people, ALL FOR MONEY. It is how the socialist libs operate. And the fools that are allowed to vote keep voting them back in to their own detriment. The libs are screwing their brains out...and the fools don’t realize it, or just don’t care as long as their welfare checks and food stamps keep coming. Hard to believe that CA was once the top state in the nation in all important respects. That was over 30 years ago. What a waste.


20 posted on 10/07/2015 10:01:50 AM PDT by EagleUSA (Liberalism removes the significance of everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson