It sounds at a minimum that there was an advocacy group. Part of me thinks that would have to be true in a system in which someone’s name has to be put forward as a candidate. For others more knowledgeable than me, this could be evidence to confirm a conspiracy.
Was there a coup??
Does a bear do it in the woods?
Is Pope Benedict XVI a Catholic?
Wow.
Well, if Benedict’s departure is result of coup, that gives hope for Francis departing soon.
Paving the way for the Antichrist.....
Interesting. Of course, Godfrey Daniels was W.C. Fields euphemism (in movies) for “God Damn.” He’s well-named.
I saw this movie.
I'd say more of a version of the David Souter nomination to the Supreme Court.
The Pope of the NWO
I’d like to know how they got Benedict to resign. Popes don’t resign.
Pushback against the purge of homos in the Catholic clergy?
Thank you for the link.
Hayward is brilliant.
Pope Francis is weak.
Cardinal Danneels from Belgium is an empty man who fails to acknowledge his failure and the failure of the Modernist Am Church that conforms to the world rather than to Christ.
Paul VI was a Mason who destroyed the mass and my guess is that Masonic Cardinals, such as Danneels, elected Pope Francis.
Pope Benedict XVI is the second smartest man alive (place anyone as number one) and he is calmly winning behind the scenes.
Pope Francis looks like he hates his job and probably feels trapped. And he expresses worry about his health.
Pope should trade places with Benedict XVI.
The Lord is showing off with such goof balls as Danneels and Bergoglio.
Read the Windswept House.
bttt
This isn’t the first time in the long and sordid history of the Catholic Church where the word of God has been willfully bastardized by fallible and corrupt, evil men.
Popey Frankie is a disaster for the Church! He is a wolf in sheep’s clothing.
Here’s the bottom line ... IF this story is true (and I have little doubt that such is the case) then:
1.) The papacy of Pope Francis is INVALID, NULL and VOID!
2.) All those individuals complicit in this affair - including Bergoglio himself, are EXCOMMUNICATED!
I pray it IS true - so we can end this farce and rid the Church of these satanic Freemasons, pederast sodomites, and Modernist heretics!
From Ann Barnhardt -
***BEGIN CITATION***
I just had a conversation with someone a few hours ago about how incredibly dark these days are, and how A.) we should implore our Blessed Lord to arise from His slumber on the fantail of the boat and save us from these heretical/apostate jackals and B.) how Our Lord will surely give His Remnant Church a trail of breadcrumbs so that we can know where we need to be and where His Church is so that we can stay close to Him.
And its happening.
Heres the deal. In order for a pope to be validly elected, there can be NO vote canvassing or . It is an automatic excommunicable offense. This law was reinforced MIGHTILY in ARSH 1996 by none other than Pope St. John Paul II. Here is the text from Universi Dominici Gregis:
The Cardinal electors shall further abstain from any form of pact, agreement, promise or other commitment of any kind which could oblige them to give or deny their vote to a person or persons. If this were in fact done, even under oath, I decree that such a commitment shall be null and void and that no one shall be bound to observe it; and I hereby impose the penalty of excommunication latae sententiae upon those who violate this prohibition. It is not my intention however to forbid, during the period in which the See is vacant, the exchange of views concerning the election.
I likewise forbid the Cardinals before the election to enter into any stipulations, committing themselves of common accord to a certain course of action should one of them be elevated to the Pontificate. These promises too, should any in fact be made, even under oath, I also declare null and void.
With the same insistence shown by my Predecessors, I earnestly exhort the Cardinal electors not to allow themselves to be guided, in choosing the Pope, by friendship or aversion, or to be influenced by favour or personal relationships towards anyone, or to be constrained by the interference of persons in authority or by pressure groups, by the suggestions of the mass media, or by force, fear or the pursuit of popularity. Rather, having before their eyes solely the glory of God and the good of the Church, and having prayed for divine assistance, they shall give their vote to the person, even outside the College of Cardinals, who in their judgment is most suited to govern the universal Church in a fruitful and beneficial way.
So, all of the Cardinals who canvassed, and, presuming he was aware of it and consented to it, the man that they were canvassing for, would all be automatically excommunicated PRIOR TO THE CONCLAVE EVEN BEGINNING.
So what is the blockbuster news? Sodomite and pedophile lover Cardinal Danneels of Belgium has just stated ON VIDEO
http://nieuws.vtm.be/binnenland/159605-danneels-zat-soort-maffiaclub
at a launch event for his fully-authorized biography that he openly admits to being a member of a mafiaclub HIS WORD formed to act against Pope Benedict XVI, that specifically canvassed and organized Bergoglios election. This is being reported in the English language sphere by the excellent and reliable journalist Edward Pentin.
Further, in this AUTHORIZED BIOGRAPHY, Danneels, who can only be described as an enthusiastic supporter of horrific sexual perversion and the slaughter of pre-born children, admits that the election of Bergoglio was organized YEARS in advance by the so-called San Gallo Mafiaclub for the express purpose of pushing through a hyper-radical and utterly heretical reform agenda centered around the ratification of perverted sex acts.
Citation from an Italian newspaper here. You can run it through googletranslate.
Lifesitenews.com has all manner of reportage on the truly despicable Danneels. You can start here,
in which there is an audio recording of Danneels telling a boy to keep his mouth shut about being raped by a bishop who also happened to be the boys uncle. Yeah. This Danneels is a real piece of shit.
Bergoglio has also HANDPICKED Danneels to be the NUMBER TWO MAN at the upcoming Synod on the Family, which is expected to drive the Church into schism.
And it all stands to reason. As we have discussed here over the last 2.5 years, Bergoglio is a thug, and the Church is pretty much completely infiltrated with people who DONT ACTUALLY BELIEVE ANY OF IT.
http://www.barnhardt.biz/2015/09/17/repost-by-request/
So, why would a power and earthly glory-hungry thug like Bergoglio, or a bunch of filthy, child-raping fags WHO DONT ACTUALLY BELIEVE IN ANY OF IT be even the tiniest bit affected by the Law of the Church? Its a PUNCHLINE to them. Why would we think that these people are internally constrained in any way for fear of a paradigm in which they DO NOT BELIEVE???
This effeminate, pollyanna worldview can no longer be defended. Its just stupid. This has been prophesied by none other than THE MOTHER OF GOD, and frankly, how could one NOT want for this nightmare to be somehow thwarted? Is normalcy bias so strong that the systematic destruction of western civilization and the Church has to be not just ACCEPTED, but defended as NOMINAL?
Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.
Mary, Mother of the Church, pray for us.
Christ, have mercy on us.
***END CITATION***
So those mortal bishops, obviously subject to all the usual corruption of satan and the flesh, are the ones who elect the pope. And they had a “coup” that shifted their politics leftward.
That surely puts the lie to that goofy myth that the pope is divinely selected, doesn’t it?
In order for a pope to be validly elected, there can be NO vote canvassing, or it is an automatic excommunicable offense. This law was reinforced in 1996 Pope St. John Paul II. Here is the text from Universi Dominici Gregis:
“The Cardinal electors shall further abstain from any form of pact, agreement, promise or other commitment of any kind which could oblige them to give or deny their vote to a person or persons. If this were in fact done, even under oath, I decree that such a commitment shall be null and void and that no one shall be bound to observe it; and I hereby impose the penalty of excommunication latae sententiae upon those who violate this prohibition. It is not my intention however to forbid, during the period in which the See is vacant, the exchange of views concerning the election.
I likewise forbid the Cardinals before the election to enter into any stipulations, committing themselves of common accord to a certain course of action should one of them be elevated to the Pontificate. These promises too, should any in fact be made, even under oath, I also declare null and void.
With the same insistence shown by my Predecessors, I earnestly exhort the Cardinal electors not to allow themselves to be guided, in choosing the Pope, by friendship or aversion, or to be influenced by favour or personal relationships towards anyone, or to be constrained by the interference of persons in authority or by pressure groups, by the suggestions of the mass media, or by force, fear or the pursuit of popularity. Rather, having before their eyes solely the glory of God and the good of the Church, and having prayed for divine assistance, they shall give their vote to the person, even outside the College of Cardinals, who in their judgment is most suited to govern the universal Church in a fruitful and beneficial way.”
So, all of the Cardinals who canvassed, and, presuming he was aware of it and consented to it, the man that they were canvassing for, would all be automatically excommunicated PRIOR TO THE CONCLAVE EVEN BEGINNING.
Ask Pope John Paul I about coups.
Oh wait, he’s dead.
Bookmark.
For a time, he was Cardinal Archbishop of Munich. Later, after the election of John Paul II, Ratzinger became his right hand man as the head of the Holy Office, the Congregation for the doctrine of the Faith, the successor to the Inquisition. He used his superior intellect and his encyclopedic knowledge of all things Catholic to relentlessly track down "liberation" "theologians," (the kind who envision Jesus Christ and Che Guevara wielding machine guns against any non-communist running any Latin American country), silencing them, defrocking them and driving them out of the priesthood. Pope Francis, by contrast, is inviting the same communist priests to the Vatican for public approval.
For the mechanics of the conclaves that elect popes, see Fr. Malachi Martin's novel The Final Conclave, written a year before Paul VI's death and predicting that death of heart failure to happen in the very month Paul VI died of heart failure, August, 1978. If you read the novel, I will tell you the real life cardinals after whom the fictional ones were created. The 1978 conclaves that elected John Paul I and St. John Paul II were a clash of about five conspiracies, few of them good, and Belgium and Germany were in the front pew of the evil. Good prevailed both times.
Something bad must have happened to allow the personalities who are said to have participated to prevail. A ring leader of the conspiracy until his death was the utterly leftist Cardinal Martini of Milan who had wanted to be pope to lead the Church leftward until its morality and liturgies were no longer recognizably Catholic. Godfreed Daneels' predecessor and patron was Leo Cardinal Suenens, one of the most evil prelates of modern times.
Walter Cardinal Kaspar who is now approaching 80 and mandatory retirement is another Suenens. Another German Cardinal in the group would be Cardinal Marx (that's his name) and the now dead English Cardinal Basil Hume who is very accurately portrayed in Martin's novel for the quisling that he was. These guys would have despised Ratzinger not only as a hard-line Church conservative but as one who defected from their ranks.
This story of a conspiracy needs more details as to HOW these people thwarted Benedict XVI and HOW the elected Bergoglio at the next conclave in which each and every voting cardinal had been appointed by either John Paul II or Benedict XVI, but the story rings true to my Catholic ears.
God bless you and yours!