Posted on 09/18/2015 10:50:39 AM PDT by Kaslin
Carly Fiorina scares the stuffing out of me.
She lost me at the word “fetus.’’
On the campaign trail and on the debate stage, the lone female candidate among the 16 contenders for the Republican presidential nomination exudes a level of superhuman control posing as gravitas.
Every hair is locked in place. No skirt crease is offline. Every word emanating from Fiorina’s sculpted lips is delivered in practiced, soothing tones, her head tilted to an unthreatening 10-degree angle.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Abortion rights are the holy sacrament of the democrat party.
Carly’s actions within Lucent are even more notorious.
http://fortune.com/2010/10/15/carly-fiorinas-troubling-telecom-past/
Good lookin’ cat. Whats that other thing?
You go ahead and vote for Rove’s flunky Carly. I will go ahead and cancel out your vote.
She’s [Fiorina] an abortionist. I’m dismayed that Sarah lowered herself to endorse her. — Jim Robinson (5/14/2010, 5:21:20 PM)
I like Carly when she is trashing Shrillary but I just disagree with most of her positions. She will never be the nominee. Only in the MSM’s dreams.
Not that I think she is pro-life. But she blasted PP and so to the Left she is pro-life (alternative left terms: against a “womans choice” or “women’s health issues”).
My first choice is Cruz,but I will support anyone over a dem or socialist. Hopefully it doesn’t come to that.
Doesn’t take much to scare this little feminist poser, does it.
How about, child marriage and child sex slaves. Whacking off female external genitalia. Would that scare her?
With a face full of smugness and botox, she's a double-bagger for sure.
Cuddling up to the McCain campaign, showing her love for Hillary (Youtube) and a multi-time failure at the highest level's of campaigning and business, prove that the Peter Principle is real.
Oh the wonders of plastic surgery!
Carly has been an insider for about 8- 10 years. She is one of Roves minions this go ‘round.
Maybe it's more important what she was saying on that stage (Meet the Press held at CGI) than where she was saying it — she was the only one (on the panel of 5 people) who was against minimum wage, against useless "global warming" regulations crushing the energy / coal sector, against Dodd-Frank creating even bigger TBTF banks and crushing small community banks, and against big government and resulting "crony capitalism" (count how many times she said that, when she had the chance) :
YouTube link: The Case for Economic Justice: Meet the Press [at CGI] - 32m:26s
Who cares? She isn’t likeable.
“Maybe it’s more important what she was saying on that stage (Meet the Press held at CGI) than where she was saying it”
No, it’s not.
Where and with whom is the message.
No kidding. Whiny snivel fuss fuss.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.