Posted on 09/16/2015 10:35:42 PM PDT by ScottWalkerForPresident2016
Edited on 09/16/2015 10:47:26 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Controversial pundit tweets...
See link for the rest
It certainly is strategically different in terms of who would be our ally in a shooting war in the Middle East. Iwo Jima wasn't a very big place, either; but it was critically more important to us than Mexico in WW2.
That won't stop the knees from jerking before the facts are in.
At best, though, unless she is quoting someone else and that was missed, it is a very poor choice of phrase by someone who makes her living with words.
To play 'devil's advocate', though, I think I see exasperation with the candidates being more worried about what everyone else thinks, and not the majority of the American People (to whom they are applying for a job).
Oh, quit the whining and mewling. You can dish it out, but you take it like a little girl.
" Nice try, but you're just desperate to score jabs because, for whatever reason, you have some kind of grudge against me."
Whine, mewl, cry, wail....poor little victim you.
" I've probably humiliated you in the Religion Forum since I know more theology and church history than you do!"
So what?
First of all, if your goal in the Religion Forum is to "humiliate" people, I'd say that pretty much reveals everything we need to know about you.
Secondly, I don't know how you manage to "humiliate" anyone with that whiny demeanor you have going on.
Yes. As ever, if you have to explain the joke ... It wasn’t much of a joke!
While this may be true, it's also known that many of those secular Jews denounce Israel and emote over the collateral damage to Palestinians and their children when Israel defends itself from Palestinial bombs.
You're repeating yourself. Cruz opposes amnesty which he defines as a pathway to citizenship. He doesn't oppose granting legal status, which, by the way, guarantees they will become citizens at some point regardless of what anybody says:
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/08/ted_cruz_vs_donald_trump_whos_stronger_on_immigration.html
But that’s inconvenient for you, because you have to believe that your reality-show celebrity is the messiah who will wave his hand and (poof) accomplish all the things he’s been promising, just like that.
Translation: You're probably a closet amnesty supporter anyway who opposes the border wall and deportation of illegals. Hence to build a wall is, to you, "magic," because you are against it.
Whine, mewl, cry, wail....poor little victim you.
LOL, you're so pathetic that you have to project your own victimhood mentality onto others. I got you nailed on Ted Cruz and on your weakness on immigration. Go suck an egg.
I do not recall her calling him a faggot. She called him "Silky Pony" referencing his preoccupation with his appearance, especially his hair. His unfaithfulness to to his dying wife was with another woman.
There is something wrong with her. Holy crap.
I am a Jew and watched the same debate she did and I knew the people who were proudly saying we would have better relations with our one ally in the Middle East, the only democracy, the only country sharing our values, were not saying it to pander to Jews: they love the Holy Land themselves as Christians and they also respect the democracy and ally that is Secular Israel.
You actually have to be a literal anti-Semite to not just aside these comments to a friend but to tweet them to the nation.
It’s kind of shocking.
Kick everybody out and let the “good ones” back in quickly."
I caught that last night, but just barely---if I recall, he said it and the moderator immediately moved on.
His supporters will excuse it, though.
So, what you’re saying is that Coulter DID restrain herself. She edited out the “b*****d” word so she wouldn’t offend. :-)
No, she's always been thin, but with no obvious deterioration that you would get from long-term drug use. Her skin, hair and eyes are quite healthy looking in person, based on the last time I saw her a couple of years ago.
It has been speculated that she may have a touch of Marfan syndrome.
All I did was post the things Hillary supposedly said about Jews. We know she kissed Yasser Arafat’s wife during a meeting several years ago. And that she supports the dangerously anti-Israel Iran deal.
She is not riffing on Hillary with a three decade old obscure reference. Dont be silly. She is correctly asking why the candidates are pandering to a people who will never vote for them in the first place. I have always asked the same. It is like when the GOP would pander to the gays. Who gives a damn about such a small amount of potential votes? Let the rats have their measly votes. We have bigger fish to fry.
I was surprised by this. She is diminished. Hate does not produce anything. It is a tattoo painted onto the statue of David, and it becomes the first thing a person sees. A stain.
Do you people in this thread and Haaretz not understand how grammar works, or are you all just being disingenuous?
When I ask, “Where’s the fucking remote?!?”, it doesn’t mean I hate the fucking remote controller.
Just attempting to be witty, which is sometimes hard to do online. Otherwise, hello and hope you are well!
I figured that. I’m doing ok. Thanks for asking.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.