Posted on 09/13/2015 6:04:06 PM PDT by Steelfish
Actually doesn't that show that we don't allow people to be treated as property, you know like slavery?
Indeed it does and that hits a very salient point. That is, marriage is redefinable at will. So when 100,000 middle eastern refugees have been dumped into the county and shariah takes hold by the ballot box, Kim Davis will be able to sell her daughter for three goats and a cow, legally. And what happens to the LGBT types under shariah? I hear that the air is fresher on the hotel roofs.
I don't recall saying it was "non-threatening", or that I declined to pay, I said they usually just send me a bill. Apparently I don't get the same "special" treatment that you do.
Davis might be a public figure, but her daughter isn’t.
Is this supposed to be a news story or an editorial?
It’s a feminist statement from advocates of sodomy. There was an ancient practice for grooms of showing sincerity toward mutual support with in-laws by giving valuable gifts. The abominable ones are equating that practice with an act of purchasing slaves. Meanwhile, the abominable ones, having climbed into high places, cheat, mistreat and refuse to release slaves in their whole lifetimes.
May the whole natural world be made to work against them.
Whatever makes your chains sit lighter, taxpeasant. :)
It does not, as this confuses the means of procuring a wife with what constitutes a wife. But sodomite relations are themselves confusion.
Yahoo News is far left. I’d say this group didn’t “burn” anybody, but did illustrate their own childish mentality. But then we have some of those here, like the posters who hate Kim David because she’s a Democrat.
Yeah, Yeah and whatever floats your boat.........serf.
Like a gas station attendant placing the pump in the exhaust pipe with the caption, Sinclair’s new job description.
If they feel so strongly about dowry’s then maybe they should be protesting the incoming ‘refugees’ or Indians. Dowry’s are a cultural belief, not a religious one.
Whatever they want to say doesn’t put a p*nis on a female. There is not joining together of two women or two men. There is only a perversion of the norm. The sex organs do not match up. Period. It takes no religion to figure that out. Just a brain.
Not true. It's the fact that you can't marry a goat or a cow that means we redefined marriage. That was more or less at the creation of the world, but we got it right. Why do you want to change it back?
The backdoor brigade fear people like Kim Davis. Men and women were created or evolved (take your pick) as complementary parts of a whole. These biologically incorrect deviants are the legion of the sexually retarded trying to make make natural sexual copulation equivalent to disease ridden pseudo sex. That they act as if they are enlightened is beyond laughable. As if sticking something in the hole it wasn’t intended for makes one “evolved” when all it does is help you catch diseases.
Dear Ms. Davis: if your views on marriage are a little old and outdated, you’re in good company.
So are God’s.
LGBT = coprophilia
No other words. Black letters on a rainbow background.
Let everyone who doesn't know what it means go and google it. I didn't know until someone posted it in FR earlier this year. WARNING! MAJOR BARF ALERT!
And let the lesbos themselves argue that it's NOT the case for lesbos! hahahahahah!
A distinction without a difference to the obsolete media.
Love Wins.
Marriage is now the divine act of a man ramming his baloney up another man’s cheeks.
Maybe they need a billboard depicting that, so middle America can get the message.
This is the first article that admitted homosexuals put up that asinine billboard. Homosexuals are of Satan.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.