Ping
True. But we are supposed to submit to the left and pretend there are?
Marriage no longer has a definition.
It is corrupted word hollowed out by a corrupt country.
My dog is married to your parrot?
Kim Davis is the only one following the law. The Supremes ruling only voids KY marriage law; the Left doesn’t want you to know that the SCOTUS didn’t or can’t replace KY law, so there’s a void.
So there is no marriage law in KY because there is no definition of marriage. This case is bigger than the definition of marriage. It is really about the definition of the Supreme court’s power. She is not only fighting against the sodomites, she is fighting against a more wicked power- the usurping federal government.
By the same token, if a man and a woman were previously married and the definition of marriage was changed, are they still married?
Agreed, and Kentucky isn’t the only state affected. Furthermore, if there is no legal reference for marriage, is divorce, dissolution or annulment of a “marriage” possible?
The Constitution of the United States of America does not empower the federal government to define marriage. Under the 10th Amendment, that power is reserved to the people and to the States.
The USSC is so full of themselves that they think they are above the Constitution rather than under it.
REVOLUTION!
It begs the question as to why the state has any interest in marriage in the first place. If the ruling of the supremes is carefully followed. There should be no benefits to being married, including those offered by the IRS, the protections of spousal testimony, or division of property at dissolution.
In other words, trial attorneys could stand to loose millions.
BTW, there's no such thing as homo "marriage." They're just demanding their "right" to pretend their kinky, twisted form of sex means more than just a kinky, twisted form of sex.
It's OK to laugh at homoes who are playing house. They know as well as we do their little game isn't the real thing.
yeah...I have tried that argument...
The law and order people with blinders on don’t seem to get it....
Yup.
A nice, clear explication of the issue,
The Clerk follows the laws of the state of Kentucky.
If the State is in violation then imprison the Governor, not the clerk.
Would love to see the network coverage of that Perp Walk.
But first, arrest Gov.s Jerry Brown and Andrew Cuomo for support of sanctuary cities
My comment: don’t worry, the Supreme Circus will get right on this and order the Kentucky State Legislature to pass a law making the definition include homos!
See, that’s the way our “democracy” works: 9 judges decide what all the laws will be and tell the elected officials how to vote, or else be jailed.
Wow! We fought a Revolution for that!
I agree with your explanation.
LEt’s go one step further.
A Federal judge cannot demand that the deputy clerks issue any marriage license, as Kentucky law is very clear—only a state judge or a county clerk can issue a license. And Kim Davis has not delegated that authority to anyone else.
Ergo, the license are being issued under fraudulent means, under no authority, and completely illegally.
Nice work, P.
Your analysis is spot on.
Great job, sir.
I’ve been saying this for the last few days but no where near as well as you have!!
I’ll have to check back in a little while to see if the usual crowd shows up....the thread yesterday netted 4 zots, wonder what this one will bring?
AND, as the Tennessee judge declared, “I can’t grant divorces since the law defining marriage is null and void. I have no definition of marriage or non-marriage.”