The Constitution of the United States of America does not empower the federal government to define marriage. Under the 10th Amendment, that power is reserved to the people and to the States.
The USSC is so full of themselves that they think they are above the Constitution rather than under it.
REVOLUTION!
There is no “right” to change the meaning of Words in a “legal” system. It destroys Reason and makes Language incoherent and meaningless.
As Wittgenstein stated, controlling words and language will control all perceptions of the masses. (That is why toxic cultures like the vulgar, homosexual Weimar Republic resulted in the glorification of Hitler). Total irrational people raised inside such a toxic culture—devoid of critical thought, like the Afghani harem boys will grow up to be-—fixated on boys, males and goats, and hating and mutilating women and girls. (It is habituation and programming of Marxist, irrational, evil ideas).
The Mind Control of all the children is “why” the Leftists have to destroy all Traditions and history (Marxism)-—so that the children raised in such an irrational culture will determine everything a child “thinks”.
Of course-—it is all controlling perceptions (emotions) for the NWO of total slavery (Fichte 1810) where the children are made so irrational (up is down, boys are girls, and “snow is black”, that they will believe whatever the sodomite Hollywood group put out on their screens and into their video games——and the Leftists will condition and program evert child into their worldview and habits very easily, if children have no meaningful interaction inside the Natural Family.
It is what the MSM and the Prussian system of mass indoctrination is set up to do——control all information and all perceptions (emotions) of the ignorant masses.
As Diana West has documented——all you “know” through history books and MSM has to be relearned for it is all a great big LIE. (She is right-—and worth reading). When your foundation is made up of lies, you can never be a critical thinker or understand Reality.
Whataya expect, the SC has three of the most liberal women in the country on it and two of them did not have the honor and integrity to recuse themselves because of conflict of interest. And in addition, one of them is most likely a flaming queer in her own right.
The only recourse I see is two conservative appointments to the SC when the time comes and then do it all over again. What about congress passing new laws? Hep me out here.