NYT Slams Donald Trumps Immigration Plan: "Barely Subtextual Racism"

Breitbart.com ^ | August 21, 2015 | Mathew Boyle

[Biggirl]

The heads of the Manhattan elites who run the New York Times editorial board collectively exploded on Thursday evening in response to GOP frontrunner Donald Trump’s detailed immigration reform plan that would put Americans first over foreigners and special interests.

[Tzimisce]

If they can ignore our law because they’re brown and I have to follow the law because I’m white, who’s really the victim of racial discrimination?

[miss marmelstein]

Uh oh. The African-American Studies and English Literature graduates going after The Donald! Subtexural, indeed.

[GilGil]

It is racist to put Americans first over foreigners and illegals. Unbelievable.

The way things are now, foreigners and illegals come ahead of Americans.

Wow!

[Old Sarge]

I would not expect anything different from Pravda-On-The-Hudson.

[BenLurkin]

his despicable proposals... in its scapegoating of immigrants, its barely subtextual racism, its immense cruelty in seeking to reduce millions of people to poverty and hopelessness

Ah, okay, we get it now NYT. You demand that America die -- in order to make life easier for the people who have invaded her.

[Jim Robinson]

The NYT is anti-America. Always has been, always will be.

[Georgia Girl 2]

When you have no valid argument always yell racism.

[struggle]

[falcon99]

“...New York Times editorial board collectively exploded on Thursday...” Such a shame that is a figurative statement rather than a literal statement.

[tumblindice]

We’re racists because we’re fed up with being murdered on the streets by Obama’s `undocumented boomerangs’?
KMA, NYT!

[navyguy]

In related news: NYT Thought Police accuses anyone who doesn’t walk on politically correct egg shells of being a racist for the 978,804,612,371 time.

[Steely Tom]

It used to be “code words,” then “a dog whistle.”

Now it’s “subtextural.”

The left manufactures slogans all day long. In fact, that’s their main productive output.

Any slogan, and buzzword, any tagline generated on our side is instantly attacked as racism, and a demand issued that we stop using it.

[amihow]

And what race is that that Trump is against? What geniuses at Time.

[EinNYC]

Me to NYT: drop dead, you blatant anti-semites. I guess your constant swipes at Jews and Israel throughout the years don’t count, eh? The best use for your decaying rag is the cat litter box. Too bad I don’t subscribe to your biased rag, if only to have the satisfaction of watching my cats’ waste products soak into your lies.

[LydiaLong]

Oh PLEASE. We don’t hate them because of their race. We hate them because they break our laws and take things that aren’t theirs. Fruck the New York Times.

[Will88]

Carlos Slim has his shills at the New York Times putting out the foreign invader line about the xenophobic Americans who think they have some right to decide who comes into their country.

[arthurus]

I think that charge is finally subsiding into Irrelevance and triviality thanks to Trump. He is the first major figure who doesn’t dance around PC speech and apologize abjectly every time he is attacked for some “insensitivity” or other. Now conservatives and Christians need to reclaim all the banned words and definitions and learn actual grammar once again. Then we can again say what we mean without all the necessary ornaments and caveats.

[GilGil]

This may be a minor detail, but is the New York Times not owned by a Mexican citizen doing the Mexican governments bidding.

Shades of Univision isn’t it!!!!!

[driftless2]

Republican politician:"Maybe we should be more careful about who we let in the country."

NYT typical liberal response:"Arrrrgghhh!!!! FILTHY RACIST!!!!!"