Skip to comments.
F.B.I. Tracking Path of Email to Hillary Clinton at State Dept.
New York Times ^
| August 14, 2015
| MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT and DAVID E. SANGER
Posted on 08/14/2015 2:50:44 PM PDT by reaganaut1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Yeah, the real criminals are the State Department employees who sent classified information to the private email account Hillary Clinton set up.
To: reaganaut1
2
posted on
08/14/2015 2:52:00 PM PDT
by
tsowellfan
(www.cafenetamerica.com)
To: reaganaut1
There has also been no evidence that she broke the law...Really?
3
posted on
08/14/2015 2:52:45 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: reaganaut1
If someone passed the information to Mrs. Clinton, after stripping the ‘top secret’ designation from the communique, you can damn sure bet that they were instructed to do so. Who would do that on their own?
4
posted on
08/14/2015 2:55:32 PM PDT
by
fhayek
To: reaganaut1
It begins. Her Royal Highness will not be held accountable for her crimes. A few underlings will be sacrificed to save her Royal A$$.
5
posted on
08/14/2015 2:56:19 PM PDT
by
I want the USA back
(Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country)
To: reaganaut1
6
posted on
08/14/2015 2:56:21 PM PDT
by
jimbo123
To: BenLurkin
There has also been no evidence that she broke the law... Let them keep thinking that until after she wins the Primary (if she does)
7
posted on
08/14/2015 2:56:57 PM PDT
by
tsowellfan
(www.cafenetamerica.com)
To: jimbo123
Think Huma will sing or take one for the party?
8
posted on
08/14/2015 2:58:02 PM PDT
by
tsowellfan
(www.cafenetamerica.com)
To: tsowellfan
She wasn’t the one with top security clearance whose duty it was to ensure the classification of classified data.
This falls squarely on the cankles of Hillary.
My question is why did she have this data?
Was she selling it to foreign governments in exchange for donations?
Because that would be espionage.
9
posted on
08/14/2015 3:01:16 PM PDT
by
chris37
(Heartless)
To: reaganaut1
Oh I see. It’s not HER fault these idiots passed her classified emails. See?!
Pay no heed to anything else. It’s not her fault, it’s not her fault, it’s not her fault.
10
posted on
08/14/2015 3:02:20 PM PDT
by
vpintheak
(Man up and bring it politicians!)
To: I want the USA back
“It begins. Her Royal Highness will not be held accountable for her crimes. A few underlings will be sacrificed to save her Royal A$$.”
Indeed.
You have nailed it.
11
posted on
08/14/2015 3:03:16 PM PDT
by
Da Coyote
(Di)
To: reaganaut1
This is sounding more ridiculous by the day. How many phony scenarios can this clown show come up with. So we are to believe that almost all of the top secret messages were unmarked TOP SECRET so to be sent to Hillary and she had no clue that they were top secret. Sounds as though Hillary is not fit be in charge of cleaning blue rooms.
12
posted on
08/14/2015 3:04:07 PM PDT
by
jetson
To: reaganaut1
FBI working to cover for H->.
13
posted on
08/14/2015 3:04:17 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
To: reaganaut1
>> To track how the information flowed, agents will try to gain access to the email accounts of many State Department officials who worked there while Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state
A cover-up of breathtaking audacity and scope is in process.
The arrogance and criminality of this administration defies description.
14
posted on
08/14/2015 3:04:33 PM PDT
by
Nervous Tick
(There is no "allah" but satan, and mohammed was his demon-possessed tool.)
To: reaganaut1
The only series H-> is is demented.
15
posted on
08/14/2015 3:05:27 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
To: reaganaut1
IF it turns out that State Departments employees were circulating top secret emails on unclassified systems, wasn’t that Hillary’s State Department? And who were these employees - Huma?
To the ordinary voter, it has to seem like nothing was more top secret to Hillary than whatever she had to hide on her private server.
16
posted on
08/14/2015 3:07:05 PM PDT
by
Faith Presses On
("After this I beheld, and, lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations...")
To: jimbo123
17
posted on
08/14/2015 3:08:32 PM PDT
by
A CA Guy
( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: I want the USA back
Yeahhhh. You set up a server in your house. You have underlings forward classified communiques to you at that server. You avoid the secure e-mail systems set up by intelligence experts in order to control your communications. You don't tell others of this 'secret server'. YOU decide what e-mails to turn over to investigators while deleting 30,000 others that are 'none of their business', then you scrub clean the server.
...and it's the underlings' fault?
18
posted on
08/14/2015 3:08:45 PM PDT
by
fhayek
To: Nervous Tick
The arrogance and criminality of this administration defies description. It's a two-way street. They can either broom the investigation or indict her, depending on how she behaves and what they want to get from her.
To: reaganaut1
Nothing is Hillary’s fault. That can’t possibly happen. Pure as the driven snow don’t ya know.
20
posted on
08/14/2015 3:12:22 PM PDT
by
teletech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson