Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

F.B.I. Tracking Path of Email to Hillary Clinton at State Dept.
New York Times ^ | August 14, 2015 | MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT and DAVID E. SANGER

Posted on 08/14/2015 2:50:44 PM PDT by reaganaut1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: reaganaut1

They better start rolling up on HRC before they meet an unfortunate end...dead men (and women) don’t tell tales.


41 posted on 08/14/2015 4:05:33 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike ('You can avoid reality, but you canÂ’t avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.Â’)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

“Dick Morris: Hillary Will Be Indicted”

Dick Morris predicts she will be indicted? That means she will not be indicted.


42 posted on 08/14/2015 4:22:38 PM PDT by AC86UT89
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AC86UT89

Agree. Morris is a preening know-nothing.


43 posted on 08/14/2015 4:29:48 PM PDT by Col Frank Slade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

should be fairly easy to do - all emails leave a trace.


44 posted on 08/14/2015 4:36:59 PM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

It’s more than just spin by the Clinton campaign.

On the noon news today on the “conservative leaning” radio station in Phoenix, the lead story was that “experts say” the Top Secret messages on Hillary’s server were not “THAT sensitive”.

So, the low information people now have everything they need to know.


45 posted on 08/14/2015 4:43:17 PM PDT by rascal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Typelouder

I think she was selling this information to foreign governments for personal gain.

She is an America hating money grubbing whore of a woman, and I think she was selling secrets for donations for personal enrichment.


46 posted on 08/14/2015 4:46:38 PM PDT by chris37 (Heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
...and many specialists believe the occasional appearance of classified information in her account was probably of marginal consequence.

And who are these "specialips"? A couple of gay journ-0-lists at the New York Slimes?

Honestly many specialists are not saying this at all, if their specialties involve government computer systems and classified data handling. A PURE LIE.

Schmidt and Sanger. Propagandists!

47 posted on 08/14/2015 4:57:29 PM PDT by Alas Babylon! (As we say in the Air Force, "You know you're over the target when you start getting flak!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Just remember, none of these actions (if they happened) would have been necessary if her highness had not violated both policy and law in setting up her private server and e-mail accounts in order to keep what she did and said in her e-mails out of the hands of the govt and public.


48 posted on 08/14/2015 5:53:39 PM PDT by falcon99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1


49 posted on 08/14/2015 8:50:30 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson