Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CISA: the dirty deal between Google and the NSA that no one is talking about
The Hill ^ | July 29, 2015 | By Evan Greer and Donny Shaw

Posted on 07/29/2015 10:43:18 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee

One of the things that civil liberties activists like to lament about is that the general public seems to care more about Google and Facebook using their personal data to target advertising than the government using it to target drone strikes.

The reality is that both types of abuse are dangerous, and they work hand in hand.

It’s hard to find a more perfect example of this collusion than in a bill that’s headed for a vote soon in the U.S. Senate: the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act, or CISA.

CISA is an out and out surveillance bill masquerading as a cybersecurity bill. It won’t stop hackers. Instead, it essentially legalizes all forms of government and corporate spying.

Here’s how it works. Companies would be given new authority to monitor their users -- on their own systems as well as those of any other entity -- and then, in order to get immunity from virtually all existing surveillance laws, they would be encouraged to share vaguely defined “cyber threat indicators” with the government. This could be anything from email content, to passwords, IP addresses, or personal information associated with an account. The language of the bill is written to encourage companies to share liberally and include as many personal details as possible.

That information could then be used to further exploit a loophole in surveillance laws that gives the government legal authority for their holy grail -- “upstream” collection of domestic data directly from the cables and switches that make up the Internet.

Thanks to Edwards Snowden, we know that the NSA, FBI, and CIA have already been conducting this type of upstream surveillance on suspected hackers. . .

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: cybersecurity; privacy; security; spying; surveillance

1 posted on 07/29/2015 10:43:18 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Our Congress at work, “doing no evil.”


2 posted on 07/29/2015 10:47:38 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

I often wonder how secure they could make computers if our government didn’t force them to leave backdoors open.


3 posted on 07/29/2015 10:49:37 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (It's a shame nobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Bump.


4 posted on 07/29/2015 10:51:47 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

“I often wonder how secure they could make computers if our government didn’t force them to leave backdoors open.”

All of this would be dreamland for Stalin and Beria; surveillance equipment is expensive. Here, the people being spied upon actually buy and maintain their own equipment.


5 posted on 07/30/2015 5:09:32 AM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson