Posted on 07/29/2015 9:08:48 AM PDT by Kaslin
There will be two GOP candidate forums (sponsored by Fox News) on August 6 in Cleveland, OH. The main event will feature candidates polling in first-through-tenth place over a series of five newly-released national surveys. Earlier in the day, however, the network will also host a debate for candidates…not doing as well. Previously, Fox said only candidates polling one percent or higher would merit an invitation.
Now, however, Politico reports the network has lowered the bar:
Fox News is opening its 5 p.m. debate to all the announced Republican candidates who fail to make the cut for the Aug. 6 prime-time event, removing a requirement that participants reach at least 1 percent in polling.
The change amounts to an insurance policy for candidates who were in danger of being disqualified from the vital first debate based on low polls – Carly Fiorina, former New York Gov. George Pataki and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).
The announcement by Michael Clemente, Fox News Executive Vice President, News, means that all 16 announced candidates will qualify for Cleveland — either the 5 p.m. undercard, or the 9 p.m. main event.
Probably for the best, honestly. Changing the rules (a) appeases the partisans of these low-polling candidates and (b) gives everyone a chance to either sink or swim in the national spotlight. It’s more fair and competitive. What’s not to like?
Then again, if there are no requirements anymore for who qualifies, does that mean anyone can participate? Ah, not quite:
“Due to the overwhelming interest in the FOX News Facebook Debate Event Night on August 6th and in a concerted effort to include and accommodate the now 16 Republican candidate field — the largest in modern political history — FOX News is expanding participation in the 5 PM/ET debate to all declared candidates whose names are consistently being offered to respondents in major national polls, as recognized by Fox News,” said Clemente in a statement.
In other words, if you’re not famous enough to appear in a national poll, you’re not getting in. Thank goodness.
Too many of the Establishment’s candidates were falling out of the top 10, so Establishment Fox changed the policy. (It was always meant to exclude conservative candidates, not theirs.)
Circus, by design. Question is, who encouraged/convinced the bottom tier that they should jump in.
Oh good grief. Wake me when the circus is over.
Is this like the fold-out table at Thanksgiving?
I don’t mind diluting the establishment candidates’ votes by having more establishment candidates.
What we need is to have just one conservative and nine Rinos in the debates.
Hopefully, Christie’s pugnaciousness makes an impression. I’e been looking at him as one who could help dilute the Establishment vote.
Carly’s one who could help with this. I don’t think anyone takes Pataki or Gilmore seriously, but you never know what a good debate performance could do for them.
Goober? No.
Bingo!
More like the play of the first Thanksgiving the kiddies put on for the adults before they are relegated back to the kiddies table.
What a farce.
“Is this like the fold-out table at Thanksgiving?”
Yep. At all family parties when young, I sat at the second tier card table to eat, along with the other young ones in our family. It was a great and memorable day when I finally graduated to the adult table; it took forever to get there, lol. So, some candidates have to debate at the second tier youngster’s table until they can graduate to the grownup’s debate table. That’s life.
As far as I'm concerned, the original plan of having 10 on the stage was too high by about 4. Having 15 or 16 on the debate stage will be a complete joke.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.