Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Social Liberalism Winning?
Townhall.com ^ | July 24, 2015 | Brent Bozell

Posted on 07/24/2015 8:11:13 AM PDT by Kaslin

Editor's note: This article was co-authored by Tim Graham.

The end of the Supreme Court term was depressing for conservatives. The double-whammy of a 50-state mandate for gay marriage and the upholding of Obamacare sounded the alarms for religious freedom. All that unease is measurable.

Credit The Washington Post for doing precisely that. The polling team has just reported, "Liberals have won a string of victories on gay marriage and health care reform this year, but a new Washington Post-ABC News poll finds a large majority of Americans are unhappy with where the nation is headed on social issues."

They found 63 percent of respondents are uncomfortable with the country's overall direction on social issues these days; 41 percent feel "strongly" uncomfortable about the nation's changes.

The spin coming from the media suggesting there is a national celebration underway is simply false. Indeed, the findings aren't encouraging for Democrats: 51 percent of racial minorities are uncomfortable with the current tide on social issues, along with two-thirds of women and even 50 percent of adults under age 30. That doesn't sound like the conventional wisdom about the "right side of history" crushing everything in its path.

The left counts on unelected forces to press its agenda. Hollywood's assembly line of products push the LGBT agenda with so much fervor that polls show Americans think about a quarter of the population is gay, 10 times higher than reality. Judges with their fingers in the wind feel "change" is in the air, and bow to media elite pressure.

But the debate isn't over. On the hot-button issues individually, the nation is divided. "History" is incomplete. It's as fluid as the liberals are on gender. It's true that gays have made significant gains in recent years -- but how significant? On the Supreme Court mandate for gay marriage, 52 percent expressed support and 44 percent were opposed (51 to 45 among registered voters). The public divides more closely on the Supreme Court ruling for Obamacare (45 percent for, 42 percent against).

Nevertheless, media coverage of these issues lines up dramatically for making and solidifying "change" and lectures that the Republican Party would be suicidal to take a stand against the tsunami of social liberalism. It dovetails perfectly with President Obama's spin. Both willfully ignore polls that suggest otherwise.

A new AP-GfK poll also found less of a social revolution in the polls. Their survey found support for gay marriage in America slipped to 42 percent, with 40 percent opposing. Only 39 percent backed the Supreme Court decision, 41 percent were opposed, and 18 percent didn't take a position. When gay rights was placed alongside religious liberty, 39 percent said it's more important for the government to protect gay rights, while 56 percent said protection of religious liberties should take precedence. Support for religious vendors being able to refuse to serve gay marriages climbed seven points to 59 percent.

Unease with the state of social issues in the country surely means other issues as well, including illegal immigration, legalizing marijuana in several states, racial rioting, and the rhetorical war on police officers coming from the left.

No one should believe liberals when they imply that social conservatives are finished. As a liberal hero once proclaimed on a convention stage, "the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: cannabis; freedomofreligion; homosexualagenda; marijuana; obamacare; pot; religiousliberty; socialissues; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: longtermmemmory
The people who before legalization didn't smoke pot because it was illegal, will after legalization not drive stoned because it's still illegal - ergo, no reason to expect a rise in stoned driving due to legalization.

it has happened per police.

Evidence?

41 posted on 07/24/2015 10:58:27 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: donna

Thanks.


42 posted on 07/24/2015 11:06:35 AM PDT by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

“Since marijuana legalization, highway fatalities in Colorado are at near-historic lows” - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3280359/posts


43 posted on 07/24/2015 11:19:36 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

dubious because the pot stays in the brain for 30 days or more. There is also the pot advocates trying to say a small amount only impairs a little. Like being a little bit pregnant.

Dead victims may disagree with the pot heads’ arguments.


44 posted on 07/24/2015 11:34:26 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
dubious

Even if everything you posted is true - and in fact almost none if it is - it wouldn't contradict the numbers that show fewer deaths.

because the pot stays in the brain for 30 days or more.

There are two things that stay in the body for more than a few hours: inactive byproducts of THC; and THC that is stored in fat cells (where it doesn't affect neurons) and slowly leaches out into the bloodstream at such a tiny rate that it has no effect.

There is also the pot advocates trying to say a small amount only impairs a little. Like being a little bit pregnant.

No, like being a little under the influence of alcohol, as distinct from a lot.

Dead victims may disagree with the pot heads’ arguments.

The numbers show that there are fewer dead victims.

45 posted on 07/24/2015 11:44:11 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: polymuser
U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman:
“The psychological case notes indicate that while Mr. D’Souza is highly intelligent, he has remarkably little insight into his own motivations, that he is not introspective or insightful, but that he tends to see his own actions in an overly positive manner..."

The judge noted the psychologists “chart indicates Mr. D’Souza tends to deny problems, that he lacks insight into his own behavior, that he is arrogant and intolerant of the feelings of others, while projecting an overly positive image of himself.”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/psych-major-judge-overrides-doctors-on-dsouza/#WlYF84IdPqD3u4u0.99

Thought crimes.

46 posted on 07/26/2015 5:48:45 PM PDT by Diamond (He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Diamond

Yep. What prog/lib/leftist/Democrat despots could that statement perfectly describe?


47 posted on 07/29/2015 10:39:46 AM PDT by polymuser ( Enough is enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson