Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Walker says he supported path to citizenship, but not amnesty
Washington Examiner ^ | July 18, 2015 | Philip Klein

Posted on 07/19/2015 11:19:41 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker acknowledged in a CNN interview that in the past he had expressed support for a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants, but said that he wasn't talking about amnesty at the time.

In an interview aboard his campaign trailer that aired Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union," Dana Bash pressed Walker about his shift from somebody who once said a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants "made sense" to a presidential candidate talking about restrictions on legal immigration. She asked whether such shifts undermined his pitch to voters that he's somebody who stands up for his principles.

"The only issue where I've clearly said I had a position before — and even on that, as governor, I didn't have a role to play in immigration. I said there should be a path, years ago, when I talked about going forward with legal immigration", he said. "I didn't talk about amnesty. In fact, I said in that specific interview, I opposed the 'Gang of 5,' the measure that Marco Rubio proposed. So I specifically even then said, 'I'm not supporting that.' But I said flat out in the beginning of the year, that's a position I have changed on."

In the 2013 interview with the Wausau Daily Herald editorial board that has gotten a second life during his presidential run, Walker was asked about the millions of individuals who immigrated to the United States illegally, and whether he could see them gaining citizenship with the right mix of penalties and waiting periods. "Sure, yeah," he responded. "I mean, I think it makes sense."

The meaning of the term "amnesty" is itself a hotly debated one in politics, and to many conservatives, any path to citizenship to those who entered the country illegally — even with penalties — would be considered amnesty.

Bash also asked Walker about comments he's made about legal immigration.

"What I've specifically said is I think priority under legal immigration should be given to the impact on American working families on their wages in a way that would improve the American economy," Walker said. "That not only means people like me who were born here, that means people like the woman I just met in Cedar Rapids, for example, who moved here many years ago, was a political refugee of the Congo, and who went through the process to be a legal citizen. She's working here. And I believe for her, and for others who were born here, there needs to be priority given, to say, we're going to need to make sure we put priority [on] American working families and their wages. Doesn't mean there won't ever be legal immigration, it just means that's what our priorities should be."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico; Politics/Elections; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; economy; illegalimmigration; legalimmigration; pathtocitizenship; scottwalker; semantics; walker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last
To: Cincinatus' Wife

I could even support actual amnesty. If it were coupled with several decades of zero or greatly reduced immigration and strict enforcement of the laws.

While A could happen, B and C are quite impossible. So I can’t support amnesty in the end.

Reagan signed an amnesty bill, then it was not enforced, not, I believe, even under Reagan himself. A few calls from Big Business GOP contributors and attempts at enforcement dried up.


61 posted on 07/20/2015 12:42:14 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mn-bush-man

Yes. I did support Rick Perry, wholeheartedly.

The country would be in a lot better place if he’d been elected.

Walker wasn’t running (I was hoping if Perry got the nomination, that he’d choose Walker for VP).

So I’m thrilled that Walker is in the race and doing so well.


62 posted on 07/20/2015 12:42:19 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I was just going to ask, isn’t that amnesty by another name?


63 posted on 07/20/2015 12:44:11 AM PDT by Mark17 (When I see the mountain, covered with snow, fallen from Heaven above. Makes me feel so small)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

From your link:

“....I voted AIP as a protest against the GOPe because I live in California and my vote for President was therefore otherwise immaterial.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Independent_Party

Thank you. That wasn’t so hard, was it?


64 posted on 07/20/2015 12:45:21 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

“A “path to citizenship” is written into our Constitution and has been since our founding. Stop twisting his words.”

That’s for legal immigrants, not illegal aliens.


65 posted on 07/20/2015 12:46:37 AM PDT by flaglady47 (The useful idiots always go first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

How dense can you be—that is amnesty.

And it will be thee end of our country.


66 posted on 07/20/2015 12:49:30 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

Illegal aliens can do it, too. They also have a path to citizenship. They only need to report to a U.S. immigration office back in their home country in order to get started.


67 posted on 07/20/2015 12:51:55 AM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Illegal aliens can do it, too. They also have a path to citizenship. They only need to report to a U.S. immigration office back in their home country in order to get started.

They do that living back in their own country, not while living in ours illegally. Anyone can apply for U.S. citizenship. No one is supposed to be living in our country illegally while doing so, otherwise the word illegal holds no meaning.


68 posted on 07/20/2015 12:56:10 AM PDT by flaglady47 (The useful idiots always go first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

There also are many who have “overstayed” their student and tourist visas - they just stay.

They need to be addressed too.


69 posted on 07/20/2015 12:59:06 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Lol

U and I on same page


70 posted on 07/20/2015 1:02:11 AM PDT by wardaddy (Mark Levin.....I love him...but he is ignorant of Dixie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

Bttt

With all due respect to Cincy wife whom I like


71 posted on 07/20/2015 1:03:13 AM PDT by wardaddy (Mark Levin.....I love him...but he is ignorant of Dixie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Giving foreign invaders a way to stay in the country is “amnesty”, no matter what it is called


72 posted on 07/20/2015 1:04:50 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

That’s correct, and that’s how. That’s the path.


73 posted on 07/20/2015 1:10:31 AM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yes, he should be like Ted Cruz and support a 500% increase in H1-B Visas and granting work permits to the illegals who are here!

Why send them back, like what Walker wants? Cruz and the Chamber of Commerce want to create second-class citizens with work permits!


74 posted on 07/20/2015 2:54:18 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Scott Walker - a more conservative governor than Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
How can citizenship for illegals not be amnesty?

How can citizenship for illegals not be amnesty?

Thank you for representing the LYING Cruz wing of the party so well!

I guess when Walker wants them to go home and apply for citizenship (like in the constitution you supposedly adore) that is amnesty.

What does Ted Cruz want? A 500% increase in H1-B Visas and work permits for illegals who are here. Those are the Chamber of Commerce positions.....just like Cruz's vote on Iran and TPA.....Cruz is in the pocket of the Chamber, not Walker.

75 posted on 07/20/2015 2:58:52 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Scott Walker - a more conservative governor than Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Semantic games not good. We already have a path to legal citizenship, the one the illegals refused to take.

So, when Walker tells them to leave and use the legal route, it is semantic games?

Please enlighten us with more of this wisdom!

76 posted on 07/20/2015 3:00:23 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Scott Walker - a more conservative governor than Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: South40
Cruz says he is “unequivocally opposed to amnesty” (his exact words) at the 4:27 mark in this video dated May 30, 2015.

And Walker has said the same thing about being against amnesty.

But Cruz supports a 500% increase in H1-B visas and granting work permits to illegals who are here. Those are Chamber of Commerce positions that will create a second-class citizen living among us.

77 posted on 07/20/2015 3:04:43 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Scott Walker - a more conservative governor than Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie; Cincinatus' Wife

From what I can tell, Okie, you do not support anyone.

I do not want to attack your candidate, but understand what do you stand for?

I think you have attacked everyone running.


78 posted on 07/20/2015 3:11:46 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Scott Walker - a more conservative governor than Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
I was just going to ask, isn’t that amnesty by another name?

No, the constitution describes a legal immigration process.....and that is what Walker says the illegals must do....go home and come back through the legal process like everyone else.

That is not amnesty. Only LIARS want you to believe it is amnesty.

79 posted on 07/20/2015 3:14:18 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Scott Walker - a more conservative governor than Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
From what I can tell, Okie, you do not support anyone.

I have not selected anyone. Is there a problem with that?

I do not want to attack your candidate, but understand what do you stand for?

That is abundantly clear from my FR page, but you can start with this interview as it is the most broad based source. The interviewer was associated with the Future of Freedom Foundation.

I think you have attacked everyone running.

And praised not a few as well, including Walker. He's done some good work, no doubt. But see Post 53 for what I said here. I have praised and criticized every serious candidate (i.e., not Pataki etc.) except Jeb, who has earned only my scorn. I doubt you have a problem with that.

80 posted on 07/20/2015 3:21:46 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The fourth estate is the fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson