Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruz calls McCain an American Hero
Ted Cruz ^ | 7/19/2015 | Ted Cruz

Posted on 07/19/2015 5:52:22 PM PDT by usafa92

John McCain is an American hero. Although we have some policy disagreements, I'm proud to serve alongside him.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2016election; arizona; cruz; election2016; johnmccain; senatorjohnmccain; senatormccain; tedcruz; texas; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-143 next last
To: usafa92

Cruz should have stayed out of it. McCain has attacked Cruz numerous times. It is more than just differences in policies. McCain hates conservatives or anyone that stands up against him.


101 posted on 07/19/2015 7:36:14 PM PDT by BlessingsofLiberty (Remember Brian Terry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRvXEsW4Fgg


102 posted on 07/19/2015 7:36:26 PM PDT by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: M1911A1

“It’s quite possible that a man may perform bravely in one moment or mission, and be despicable after that.”

Benedict Arnold comes to mind, lol. The classic example.


103 posted on 07/19/2015 7:37:54 PM PDT by flaglady47 (The useful idiots always go first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Will88
The only point I'm making, or debating, is that Perot had raised the issues and won the support that could have won the election for him had he not sabotaged his own campaign by dropping out.

The history of 3rd party candidacies just isn't good. Our system, like it or not, is just not set up to accommodate it. In a winner take all system with no chance of coalitions, voters tend to "come home" to one or the other leg of the 2 party system. People vote against someone or the opposition party as much as they vote for a candidate or party (perhaps more). It is unlikely Perot's numbers would have remained that inflated.

Perot was erratic and a conspiracy theorist, as the election drew nearer people would consider those things more and more as the reality of actually electing the guy hit home. The sad thing is that he drew so many votes from the right and pretty much handed the White House to the Clinton's. Seriously, Perot was a nutter, no way around it when you look at the ridiculous conspiracies he was tossing around and yet there are probably quite a few people here who voted for him (my guess some of those same people would do it again with Trump).

I'm sorry to say this because I don't care for Romney, but he is right about the 47% thing. When you add up all their victim groups, minorities, etc, the Democrats really do start with about 47% or perhaps a bit more right now. If Trump ran indie he might, MIGHT, get a couple % of those (though I doubt it) leaving the Democrat at say 45%ish. Let's say Hillary is such a bad candidate that it even drops to 42% Dem turnout. The Republican is certainly not going to get less than 25% of the vote, especially considering how many Republicans in polls say they would never vote Trump. So let's say they run Jeb and get only 25%. That still means Trump only gets 33% of the vote even with that few % of nominal Democrats and some people who normally sit out. Those numbers would result in an electoral landslide for Democrats. That is the best case scenario too. The far more likely scenario is that the Republican scores much better and Trump winds up with 5-10% pulling mostly from the right of center. Again, a win for Democrats.

I just don't see it. Every election cycle this indie talk comes up and every election cycle said indie either implodes or it never materializes. The only way a Trump indie bid works is if someone on the left also runs indie and is equally as popular with the left sphere of voters. Like if Bernie Sanders decides to go 3rd party (he is actually a Socialist as it is). If you had 4 candidates, all reasonably equally popular, then yeah, you could have a real interesting election.

104 posted on 07/19/2015 7:39:35 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican

I’m not talking about tge media. Read what I said if you want to comment


105 posted on 07/19/2015 7:41:07 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

Ted is playing politics pure and simple. There was no need to make any comment whatsoever. Especially after Cruz went to see Donald this week. Either Cruz is playing the GOPe game or maybe Donald wasn’t playing ball with Ted. Either way, it’s never a good thing to come down on (or appear to be on) the side of McCain.


106 posted on 07/19/2015 7:45:52 PM PDT by usafa92 (Conservative in Jersey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
The only way a Trump indie bid works is if someone on the left also runs indie and is equally as popular with the left sphere of voters.

I don't think Trump will run as an independent unless the RNC and the other candidates and Rinos treat him so shabbily that he runs out of revenge. But idiots like McCain and Rove and a few others could accomplish it.

And nothing will convince me that Perot could not have won in 1992 had he followed through on the support he'd won and run a solid campaign until election day.

107 posted on 07/19/2015 7:54:44 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
Fine then. Has Cruz said anything directly or indirectly to even indicate that he would support such a photo op? Of course not.

Cruz and McCain are already political foes. No one in the Senate apparatus likes Cruz or Mike Lee.

Cruz is a senator until he gets elected president. If he does not get the nod and McCain gets re-elected then it's back to status quo - McCain remain a scourge and Cruz is there to fight him.

He's not going to fight Donald's fight so he can score points with the McCain haters. He doesn't have to.....all of us that despise McCain (I am certainly one of them) would take the side of man like Cruz all day, every day even if Cruz never says out loud what we say to each other here.

108 posted on 07/19/2015 7:55:08 PM PDT by Reagan Disciple (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47
Just as I suspected Cruz is taking a beating for being "Proud to serve along side him (John McCain)"

It appears kissing McCains' butt is not working out well for Cruz.

109 posted on 07/19/2015 7:56:31 PM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
McCain already went after Cruz and the rest of the "wacko birds" in Congress.

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) is continuing to criticize his fellow Republicans for their filibuster of incoming CIA Director John O. Brennan over drone policy. In an interview with the Huffington Post, McCain referred to Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) and Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) as "wackos."

"They were elected, nobody believes that there was a corrupt election, anything else," McCain said. "But I also think that when, you know, it's always the wacko birds on right and left that get the media megaphone."

Asked to clarify, McCain said he was referencing "Rand Paul, Cruz, Amash, whoever."

110 posted on 07/19/2015 7:58:15 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Just proves Cruz to be a better man than McCain.

Amen to that.

I'll add my short thought. I think Cruz is very INTENTIONAL about what he says or does. He's building a case for himself.

Here's WHY I say that, even though you may not agree.

I reviewed some of the 9 cases Ted Cruz has plead to the U.S. Supreme Court. In some of those case he made statements early on that appeared to be offsetting to his own case, only to use them later to solidify his case.

He has plead NINE case in front of the Supreme Court and he has WON ALL NINE.

At this point I have to believe Cruz is intentionally steering strong and steady toward his goal of gaining the nomination.

111 posted on 07/19/2015 8:02:20 PM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hoosierham
Did you look at the actual video, about 25 minutes long, to see and hear what was said and in what context?

Read Sharyl Attkisson: Washington Post Smeared Donald Trump; Misrepresented His Comments on John McCain

112 posted on 07/19/2015 8:03:57 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Just proves Cruz to be a better man than McCain.

Amen to that.

I'll add my short thought. I think Cruz is very INTENTIONAL about what he says or does. He's building a case for himself.

Here's WHY I say that, even though you may not agree.

I reviewed some of the 9 cases Ted Cruz has plead to the U.S. Supreme Court. In some of those case he made statements early on that appeared to be offsetting to his own case, only to use them later to solidify his case.

He has plead NINE different cases in front of the Supreme Court and he has WON ALL NINE.

At this point I have to believe Cruz is intentionally steering strong and steady toward his goal of gaining the nomination.

113 posted on 07/19/2015 8:04:36 PM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: usafa92

Well is certainly hurt his creditability by siding with McCain. He might have scored a few points with the GOPe but his lost a lot of grass roots tea party type votes. And after his TPA flip flop he needed badly to shore up his conservative base. I think this very bad mistake finishes him this election cycle. He will be reelected here in Texas but he is going to take some heat over this.


114 posted on 07/19/2015 8:07:52 PM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: selfdefense

Yes, all the other Republican candidates are piling on. What a waste of time.


115 posted on 07/19/2015 8:14:54 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX (All those who were appointed to eternal life believed. Acts 13:48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: usafa92

116 posted on 07/19/2015 8:16:12 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usafa92

117 posted on 07/19/2015 8:19:27 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
One of the reasons I opposed Trump is you Trump supporters might vote for Bush when Trump endorses him like he did Romney.

Communist Chinese Internet intel spooks are likely reading this scratching their heads wondering what Yankee nick mean. Maybe cryptic message. Thanks for the humor nick. It's always fun.

118 posted on 07/19/2015 8:26:30 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: usafa92

Ted would have been asked about this anyway...

Besides, I love how Trumpers now condemn Cruz for these comments...

While OMITTING that their guy said FOUR times that McCain is a war hero.

So, is Trump wrong on that too, then?


119 posted on 07/19/2015 8:30:01 PM PDT by TNMOUTH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

So, since he said McCain was a war hero, and TRUMP said the same thing...

Is Trump kissing his butt too, or do you just drink the same kool-aid as the others?


120 posted on 07/19/2015 8:31:11 PM PDT by TNMOUTH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson