Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"We need new ideas". Yes, we do. But just because it's "new",doesn't make the idea good or even worth looking at. The object of the Sapphic Mistress and her decidedly warped economic plan is to reduce income disparity. But the plan is some sort of economic chimerical monstrosity. The reducing of income disparity takes its roots in socialist/ communist ideology, while profit sharing is a capitalist concept. Can a capitalist economic concept help lead to a reduction in income disparity via profit sharing? No, absolutely not. Profit sharing by way of being more productive is uniquely tied to an individual's abilities. If you have only been able to produce a certain amount of income, profit sharing will not reduce anyone's income disparity. Sure, they'll get in on the national 'profit sharing" but they'll only end up with the same amount of income as percentage of profit sharing as function of their abilities, education, status, ambition and will not see any reduction in disparity say, between themselves as a school bus driver and a lawyer.
1 posted on 07/13/2015 5:00:27 AM PDT by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
To: lbryce

Yes. New ideas deeply rooted in ideologies of envy, sloth, and entitlement. The problem is there is a large sector who contribute nothing at all, taking everything they get from Government (who stole it from working taxpayers).

Now, she advocates a reallocation of wealth as “profit sharing”. Just another fancy way of government stealing from one (or an entity) to give to another.

The end result is that absolutely no good comes from wealth received from value not added.


2 posted on 07/13/2015 5:05:14 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Why don’t they just start their own businesses? Make their own profits? Oh, that mountain of government rules and regulations might dissuade them a little.


3 posted on 07/13/2015 5:06:26 AM PDT by MulberryDraw (May the arrogant be put to shame... Psalm119:78)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce
“We need new ideas,”

How novel. Why don't we just invent Employee Stock Option Plans.

4 posted on 07/13/2015 5:06:53 AM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

How many businesses have you run Hillary? Outside your family crime syndicate...


5 posted on 07/13/2015 5:06:55 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce
“We need new ideas,”

And history has shown that central planning is the way to get them.

6 posted on 07/13/2015 5:07:21 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Communism is NOT a new idea, Hitlery.


8 posted on 07/13/2015 5:10:52 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (The Confederate Flag is the new "N" word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Share your wealth with your employees first Hellary. Show us by example what you propose. Oh yeh— that ain’t happening anytime soon. Phoney.


9 posted on 07/13/2015 5:11:03 AM PDT by tflabo (Truth or tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Ooh, profit sharing.

Hollywood accounting.

Net vs. gross.


10 posted on 07/13/2015 5:12:23 AM PDT by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Don’t tell me she hasn’t heard of employee owned business, or IMHO, she expects us not to know.


13 posted on 07/13/2015 5:15:04 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce
“We need new ideas,” says a section of the text shared by her campaign. “Hard-working Americans deserve ..."

Do you think they are even aware of the irony of putting the phrase "new ideas" in the same sentence with that worn-out old lefty phrase "hard-working Americans?"

Gee, sharing very directly in the success or failure of the company. Profit-sharing, stocks, etc... Not a new idea there Hillary - that's basically the start-up model. Oh, wait, let me guess. Your "new idea" is that the "hard-working Americans" should only share in the good times. I'll bet you don't talk too much about compensation cuts when the company is struggling. Or is that another old idea like the hackneyed "hard-working Americans" - an old socialist idea...

15 posted on 07/13/2015 5:15:38 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Yo Hellary-—maybe businesses could pay their employees more if the Federal and State governments would reduce their ‘profit sharing/taking taxes’ on them.


18 posted on 07/13/2015 5:17:42 AM PDT by tflabo (Truth or tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

It’s wonderful to be in charge of other peoples’ money.


20 posted on 07/13/2015 5:27:14 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("One man with a gun can control a hundred without one." -- Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce
Profit sharing doesn't need government intrusion.

Government intrusion means politicians/bureaucrats picking winners and losers, with their dismal past history.

Another epic fail from 'the world's smartest woman'.

21 posted on 07/13/2015 5:29:01 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Share your OWN extorted “profits” first, Hillary Rotten you jerk!


22 posted on 07/13/2015 5:31:21 AM PDT by alstewartfan (If I should live to be seven I might forget Stephanie. Al Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce
"From each according to his ability ..."


24 posted on 07/13/2015 5:35:22 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

She’s needs to come out of the closet and openly adopt the hammer and sickle logo for her campaign.


25 posted on 07/13/2015 5:35:36 AM PDT by econjack (I'm not bossy...I just know what you should be doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

We already have profit sharing. Its called “Stocks”.

But of course that also involves risk sharing, which the Democrats have no interest in.


26 posted on 07/13/2015 5:37:32 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

New Idea:

How about conservative sanctuary cities in Texas or North Carolina, where state resources cannot be used in order to enforce federal tax capital gains tax or estate tax..?


27 posted on 07/13/2015 5:39:05 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Hillary is a child of the discredited and forgotten 30’s.

her staff is no better. They live the lives of those now dead and gone


28 posted on 07/13/2015 5:39:30 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... No peace? then no peace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Profit sharing:nothing is preventing employees from buying stock in their own company.


30 posted on 07/13/2015 5:40:49 AM PDT by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson