Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruz SLAMS immigration activist with one killer question
Biz Pac Review ^ | July 2, 2015 | Michael Dorstewitz

Posted on 07/02/2015 9:48:44 AM PDT by SoConPubbie

Sen. Ted Cruz shut down Univision anchor and Fusion TV host Jorge Ramos on illegal immigration, by turning a gotcha question around into a gotcha answer, and giving the host a lesson on the rule of law.

“I think rule of law matters,” the Texas Republican said on Tuesday’s edition of Fusion TV’s “America with Jorge Ramos.”

After the two volleyed the immigration issue back and forth, presidential candidate Cruz asked Ramos — an open advocate of legalizing the millions of illegals currently in the country — what happen to an American who crossed illegally into Mexico.

When Ramos admitted that Mexican authorities the American would be deported, Cruz slammed the ball for the win.

“So why should the United States not enforce our laws?” Cruz asked.

Ramos talked, but never answered the question.

Game, set and match.

“Listen, I believe in the rule of law. I think we should welcome and celebrate legal immigrants,” Cruz said.

He couldn’t have had a better message, or a better setting.

Watch the full 18-plus-minute interview, via Fusion.

Share
Tweet

H/T: The Right Scoop

YouTube Video: Ted Cruz SCHOOLS Jorge Ramos on illegal immigration and the RULE OF LAW


TOPICS: Canada; Constitution/Conservatism; Cuba; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2016election; aliens; canada; cruz; cruzillegals; cuba; election2016; mexico; tedcruz; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton
 
"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn’t make any sense at all." -- President Ronald Reagan
 
"A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice." - Thomas Paine 1792
 
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." - Samuel Adams
 
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams
 

1 posted on 07/02/2015 9:48:44 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; Kale; Jarhead9297; COUNTrecount; notaliberal; DoughtyOne; MountainDad; aposiopetic; ...
    Ted Cruz Ping!

    If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.
    Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!

    CRUZ or LOSE!

2 posted on 07/02/2015 9:49:14 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

“Listen, I believe in the rule of law”

I do too Ted, but rest assured obama and the libs are trying to “fix” the law for US.


3 posted on 07/02/2015 9:54:10 AM PDT by V_TWIN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

ping


4 posted on 07/02/2015 9:54:28 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not A Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Sigh

Ted, they’re illegal aliens not immigrants...

stop calling them immigrants

what they do to enter our country illegally and stay here illegally has nothing to do with immigration...

no part of their progress after going through our borders illegally is remotely connected to immigration..

don’t let their enablers continue to cloud the issue and make the rules and nomenclature..


5 posted on 07/02/2015 9:54:44 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

I think, Mr. Cruz, you are the only Republican at the national level that believes in the rule of law.


6 posted on 07/02/2015 9:55:56 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Biology is biology. Everything else is imagination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Great ‘Gotcha Answer’!

Wonder how Ted will handle Hillary when she plays victim to all his slam-sunk debate points; and you know she will.


7 posted on 07/02/2015 9:56:03 AM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

[[“Listen, I believe in the rule of law”]]

Question is Ted- do you believe in it so much that you are willing to IMPEACH the supreme court justices who VIOLATED the law and abused their position of power by legislating from the bench on the last two issues?

Will ANY candidate stand up to the supreme court bullies?


8 posted on 07/02/2015 9:57:32 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN
Now I'm surprised SCOTUS allowed the injunction against Obama's illegal visa scam to stand: After all, isn't illegal immigration a part of American society now like Obamacare? Isn't the "intent" of immigration law to allow immigration?

Given the court's rulings this past week, no one has any idea how the court may rule in the future-- utter lawlessness.

IMHO, no one can complain then that state nullification will introduce "anarchy," when the court itself has done such a good job of doing just that.

9 posted on 07/02/2015 9:58:52 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

LOL I pity the fool who has to face him in a debate.


10 posted on 07/02/2015 9:59:25 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Sad fact, most people just want a candidate to tell them what they want to hear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/07/01/cruz_senate_should_be_able_to_impeach_supreme_court_justices.html


11 posted on 07/02/2015 10:00:18 AM PDT by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Congrats to Ted. But that was way too easy. Ted needs a bigger ball park. And higher fences.

On Cruz control till Jan 20, 2017.


12 posted on 07/02/2015 10:02:17 AM PDT by upchuck (There is no coexisting with those who want to destroy us from within.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob434
Question is Ted- do you believe in it so much that you are willing to IMPEACH the supreme court justices who VIOLATED the law and abused their position of power by legislating from the bench on the last two issues?

Will ANY candidate stand up to the supreme court bullies?


Here's your Answer from Senator Cruz:

From a Real Clear Politics article:

Cruz: We Should Be Able To Impeach Supreme Court Justices
CRUZ: It's pure politics. The Framers, when they wrote the constitution, they believed the check on judicial overreach. The Framers wrote about judicial overreach quite a bit. They believed the check would be impeachment. Now, here is the sad reality. Within a few decades Thomas Jefferson said impeachment had been not even a scarecrow. Even 200 years ago the Supreme Court wasn't afraid of it.

Today, we have a United States Senate we can't muster 50 votes to defeat Loretta Lynch, an Attorney General who tells us she is not going to follow the law or the constitution. There's no universe in which there are 67 votes to remove [Justice] Anthony Kennedy from the Supreme Court.

13 posted on 07/02/2015 10:03:13 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

That drives me absolutely crazy as well, I wouldn’t even call them illegal aliens, I call them enemies of the United states which would classify anyone who supports them as traitors. They are foreign nationals directly attacking the security of the country.


14 posted on 07/02/2015 10:04:12 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (B. Hussein Obama: 19 acts of Treason and counting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
"Wonder how Ted will handle Hillary when she plays victim to all his slam-sunk debate points; and you know she will."

Carly Fiorina, who probably won't last through the primary season is currently Hillary's worst enemy. She will continue to go right at her, in a sense standing with Cruz and Trump while the others pussy foot around the media gotcha strategy. As long as Carly stays on the stage she will raise questions and make points that continue to keep liberal spinners awake at night.

15 posted on 07/02/2015 10:04:51 AM PDT by Baynative (Liberty lost is a high price to pay for the experiment of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Doesn't this boil down to the meaning of "rule of law?" Taken literally, this means Cruz finds homo marriage acceptable (see rule of law), affirmative action to be okay (rule of law again), federally-mandated methods and standards for public education (see rule of law), and so on, and so forth.

And if Congress or SCOTUS, or even the executive grants amnesty to those who entered the country illegally, isn't that too, according to "the rule of law?"

As long as "whatever it is" gets stamped with "rule of law," it's acceptable? Is that the standard? I think not. Cruz better watch out, because that "rule of law" cudgel swings in wild directions.

16 posted on 07/02/2015 10:05:12 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob434
Question is Ted- do you believe in it so much that you are willing to IMPEACH the supreme court justices...

Ted Cruz can't impeach anybody by himself...but you already know that!

Why ask him to do something that will never happen ?

Might as well ask him why he can't take a walk on the moon...

Cruz calling for their impeachment would simply give the progressive left the ammo they need to paint him as even more extreme...

Also consider a majority of Americans actually agree with the court...

17 posted on 07/02/2015 10:06:35 AM PDT by Popman (Christ Alone: My Cornerstone...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Thanks for that


18 posted on 07/02/2015 10:09:00 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda
My favorite question to the open borders lobby:

Do you leave your front door open when you are away or asleep and assume that only good people with the best of intentions will come in your home?

19 posted on 07/02/2015 10:10:41 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
Doesn't this boil down to the meaning of "rule of law?" Taken literally, this means Cruz finds homo marriage acceptable (see rule of law), affirmative action to be okay (rule of law again), federally-mandated methods and standards for public education (see rule of law), and so on, and so forth.

Right! <\ HEAVY SARCASM with Extreme Eye Rolls>

That's why Ted has been urging all states not covered by this ruling to ignore it.

That's why Ted has been urging clerks in Texas to ignore this ruling.

That' why he has stated emphatically that he is against this and it should be left to the States to decide and outright stated that the judges making this decision violated their oaths and should resign.

How you, as a FReeper, can come to that conclusion, absolutely mystifies me.
20 posted on 07/02/2015 10:10:58 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson