Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoConPubbie
Doesn't this boil down to the meaning of "rule of law?" Taken literally, this means Cruz finds homo marriage acceptable (see rule of law), affirmative action to be okay (rule of law again), federally-mandated methods and standards for public education (see rule of law), and so on, and so forth.

And if Congress or SCOTUS, or even the executive grants amnesty to those who entered the country illegally, isn't that too, according to "the rule of law?"

As long as "whatever it is" gets stamped with "rule of law," it's acceptable? Is that the standard? I think not. Cruz better watch out, because that "rule of law" cudgel swings in wild directions.

16 posted on 07/02/2015 10:05:12 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
Doesn't this boil down to the meaning of "rule of law?" Taken literally, this means Cruz finds homo marriage acceptable (see rule of law), affirmative action to be okay (rule of law again), federally-mandated methods and standards for public education (see rule of law), and so on, and so forth.

Right! <\ HEAVY SARCASM with Extreme Eye Rolls>

That's why Ted has been urging all states not covered by this ruling to ignore it.

That's why Ted has been urging clerks in Texas to ignore this ruling.

That' why he has stated emphatically that he is against this and it should be left to the States to decide and outright stated that the judges making this decision violated their oaths and should resign.

How you, as a FReeper, can come to that conclusion, absolutely mystifies me.
20 posted on 07/02/2015 10:10:58 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt

I think that if you believe in the rule of law, you have to accept the latest ruling of the SCOTUS. You have to abide by it, but you do not have to agree with it.

From a religious perspective, I do not believe in gay marriage. As a matter of law in MA, it is something we have had to deal with for several years now.

As long as they do not “force” my church to marry gays, that is the best I can do right now.


33 posted on 07/02/2015 10:18:43 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt

-— As long as “whatever it is” gets stamped with “rule of law,” it’s acceptable? Is that the standard? -—

Tough question. We can’t pick and choose which laws to obey, otherwise we have anarchy. OTOH, if a law mandates an intrinsic evil, we must disobey it.


57 posted on 07/02/2015 10:42:56 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson