Posted on 06/27/2015 5:15:19 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
From Jay Michaelson writing at the Daily Beast:
In controversial cases, is the role of jurist to inflame controversy, or quell it?
In Loving v. Virginia, the 1967 case which found race-based marriage bands unconstitutional, Chief Justice Earl Warren built a 9-0 consensus—just as he’d done years earlier in Brown vs. Board of Education. He knew that a country divided by race ought to be united, if possible, by a Supreme Court mindful of fundamental values—even if the Court was, as the constitution requires, overturning the will of the majority.
The four dissents in the landmark case on same-sex marriage, Obergefell v. Hodges, one by each of the conservative justices on today’s Supreme Court, take a very different view. With invective and hyperbole, they pour fuel on the fire of the controversy over same-sex marriage. Rather than merely state their views and disagreements, they use heated language to accuse the five-person majority of imperialism, a “putsch,” and worse.
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com ...
this behavior will fall into the same category as:
swingers (wife swappers)
adultery
leather fetishists
masochists
sadists
and other the other sex behaviors that are not normal...
End the SCOTUS it empowers egomaniac lawyers for life with no accountability to or consent the governed.
When you have six illiterate morons dressing in black robes and making up their own laws and accountable to no-one on earth, it is a bit hard to expect agreement.
This nation is sick unto death. When perversion is celebrated in the streets, it’s time to abandon this ship of fools.
What Good Can a Handgun Do Against an Army.....?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2312894/posts
I can’t think of anyone more “treasonous” than Patrick Henry.
How tolerant the left. No arguments. Just insults and accusations.
Sexual deviants will soon be a protected class of citizens.
I’m gonna marry my dogs.
I love them punks so much...
Claptrap! Loving did not alter the meaning of “marriage”.
and force some poor, God-fearing soul to bake a wedding cake?
Daily Beast is run by former Giuliani aide John Avlon, who is married to Lefty former Fox News darling Margaret Hoover.
Daily Beast is run by former Giuliani aide John Avlon, who is married to Lefty former Fox News darling Margaret Hoover.
Any opposition to liberal ideolgy is treason to fringe lunatic liberals.
Their ultimate goal is complete destruction to the opposition.
I’ll just make it look like a isis flag LOL
Ican’t think of anyone more “treasonous” than Patrick Henry.
__________
Please explain.
One was specifically covered by the Constitution. The other was not, regardless of what the far leftist re-writers think.
The author is too ignorant and uneducated to know the difference.
The writer of this article is also not just ignorant but alot closer to treasonous conduct than the dissent. Suggesting that judicial dissenters are “treasonous” while rewriters of the Constitution are heroes, shows this idiot is not just a dumbass but is a danger to freedoms, including the press. If anyone needs to be committed, it’s this traitor.
GTH you wimpy little bastard.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.