Posted on 06/27/2015 5:15:19 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Their are nine in robes, but six are illiterate morons.
Thanks. I figured (wrongly) that the word “treasonous”, in quotation marks would give the reader a clue as to where I was coming from.
Treason is providing aid and comfort to our enemies in wartime.
WHAT sort of pole is the Daily Crackwhore smoking???
Stalinists lie. ALWAYS
If the 14th amendment NOW applies to same sex desires, why didn’t it apply in any of the previous homosexualist cases before the court?
Both major decisions this week were acts of judicial tyranny.
This type of writing is inflammatory and revealing. It shows the true nature of some of these people. They are violent, bent on their way and on destroying whoever opposes them. We are in immediate danger.
When conservatives have a "victory" to preserve the establishment, it never is a conclusive victory, it just sets up the next round of case challenges from the Left.
But when the Left wins, it is considered 'settled'.
And by establishment, I was referring the the construct of marriage.
In previous generations, the religious conservatives were pushing for the dignity of all men (in the abolition of slavery and in equality for black people), not preserving the institution of slavery.
The Supreme Court once upheld slavery as well.
And as a side note, it was anti-Catholic Democrat klansman in the 20th century who handed down the Supreme Court decision that established the so called separation of church and state (around 95% of all parochial schools were Catholic).
9 false gods in black dresses.
Vile blather from a pro-perversion leftist.
I’m already married but I think I should be able to also marry a tree and maybe a grape vine and maybe even my F-150.
The Supreme Court also once defined marriage as between one man and one woman. Are we making progress now?
ALL cultures ancient and modern (until the post-WWII Socialist revolution) defined marriage solely between men and women.
Even where polygamy was legal, it wasn’t ‘group marriage’.
Treason against leftists is patriotism.
I am going to marry all of my firearms. The SC just said, no one can deny me the right to marry whomever or whatever I want. How can the left try to ban my firearms, that I am married too, at that point, without going against their own twisted logic and the SC.
How are you going to hold a wedding, aren’t they all at the bottom of a lake after that boating accident?
End legal positivism. Restore natural law theory. Reconsider the possibilities of ethical vigilantism so that leftist destroyers have something to worry about.
To begin with, the Court’s constitutionally indefensible decision in Obergefell v. Hodges not only exposes major corruption in both Congress and the Supreme Court, but is an excellent example of the constitutional gridlock ultimately being caused by the ill-conceived 17th Amendment (17A).
More specifically, the corrupt Senate, the most unconstitutionally powerful offiice in the land thanks to 17A imo, has repeatedly shown that it is not willing to do its constitutional duty to protect the states by working with the House to remove corrupt federal government “leaders” from office, state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices in this case.
Consider that since activist justices don’t have to worry about getting impeached and removed from office, the Court’s opinion in Obergefell V. Hodges starts out with the biggest spin on the 14th Amendment that I can recall seeing.
"Held: The Fourteenth Amendment requires a State to license a marriage between two people of the same sex and to recognize a marriage between two people of the same sex when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out-of-State."
In a nutshell, what corrupt Congress can be expected to ignore about the Court’s perverted interpretation of the 14th Amendment is this. Not only did activist justices breach the Founding States’ division of state and federal government powers, stealing unique state legislative powers in order to wrongly legalize gay marriage from the bench, but consider the following.
By arguing a tortured interpretation of the 14th Amendment to bluff that gay marriage in one state must be respected by all states, justices have also stolen Congress’s constitutional power to regulate the effect of one state’s records in other states as evidenced by the Full Faith and Credit Clause, Section 1 of Article IV.
In fact, noting that Section 2 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is evidently still in effect, by legalizing gay marriage outside the framework of the Constitution, activist justices protected by Congress’s irresponsible silence about the mischief that these justices are actually up to have wrongly ignored that Congress has exercised its Full Faith and Credit powers to clarify that states do not have to honor gay marriages from other states.
DOMA:
This Act may be cited as the “Defense of Marriage Act”.
No State, territory, or possession of the United States, or Indian tribe, shall be required to give effect to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State, territory, possession, or tribe respecting a relationship between persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such other State, territory, possession, or tribe, or a right or claim arising from such relationship.
In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word 'marriage' means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word 'spouse' refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.
Obergefell v. Hodges was nothing more than a dog-and-pony show by activist justices imo, a show intended to intended to deceive low-information citizens by sweeping Congress’s constitutional power to decide the effect of one state’s records in other states under the carpet. This is because Congress had already used that power to clarify that the states don’t have to honor gay marriages from other states, regardless what activist justices want eveybody to think about the 14th Amendment.
Note that by also stealing federal legislative powers, the Supremes have also violated Sections 1-3 of Article I imo, the Founding States making Sections 1-3 to clarify that all federal legislative powers are vested in the elected members of Congress, not in the executive or judicial branches.
So just as corrupt Congress has been routinely unconstitutionally delegating constitutionally nonexistent federal legislative / regulatory powers to non-elected federal bureaucrats such as those running the EPA, federal bureaucrats using these bogus “constitutional” powers to cause problems for many citizens which they cannot resolve with their voting power, please consider the following.
Congress is probably pleased that activist justices have now done Congress's dirty work for it by effectively reversing the intent of DOMA’s Section 2 from the bench so that members of Congress don’t have to worry about being the bad guy in regards to protecting state powers to prohibit gay marriage and lose support from LGBT voters as a consequence.
Are we having fun yet?
Again, by stealing 10th Amendment-protected state power to regulate marriage, the corrupt feds have once again abused 14A by throwing constitutionally non-enumerated rights at the states, presumably to win votes for liberal politicians.
The 17th Amendment needs to disappear, and corrupt senators and activist justices along with it.
Polygamy and pedophilia. They are next. And if you oppose them you are a confederate-flag-waving terrorist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.