One was specifically covered by the Constitution. The other was not, regardless of what the far leftist re-writers think.
The author is too ignorant and uneducated to know the difference.
The writer of this article is also not just ignorant but alot closer to treasonous conduct than the dissent. Suggesting that judicial dissenters are “treasonous” while rewriters of the Constitution are heroes, shows this idiot is not just a dumbass but is a danger to freedoms, including the press. If anyone needs to be committed, it’s this traitor.
GTH you wimpy little bastard.
It is the putsch nature of the thing... he proves the very thing he supposedly set out to refute.