Posted on 06/27/2015 6:55:04 AM PDT by justlittleoleme
Halfway down middle of page:
Region 8 Responds
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Friday that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry. What do you think?
Agree: 66%
Disagree: 34%
Disagree = 42%
And despite what the Extreme Court says b**tf*****g is not an acceptable form of "marriage" consummation.
"The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Friday that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry. What do you think?
agree. disagree"
Agree 56%
Disagree 44%
Hell NO 100%
It’s an exit, not an entry!
I say yes. They can get married. Just not in Holy Matrimony. That is reserved for the Church and it is “Protected” from the State.
They can call it marriage, a civil union, a royal b&tt F*$k. It doesn’t matter. As long as “Holy Matrimony” is reserved for religion, then do you really care?
Just change the Defense of Marriage to the Defense of Holy Matrimony Act and call it a day. PLUS.... Since SCOTUS accepted the change of words in Obamacare, there’s the precedent.
Congress should do it on Monday, send it to the Senate Monday evening and get it to the President’s desk on Tuesday morning. All the while making a big fanfare out of it.
Oh, that’s how you beat the left at their own game.
Disagree 45%.
AGREE 56%
DISAGREE 44%
It just came to me that the use of the rainbow is racist. The rainbow is the “White Light” spectrum and totally devoid of black! Bunch of racists!
47% disagree now.
I’m not sure the selection of who is on that power crazed court matters all that much anymore, even if we could control it and we demonstrably cannot.
As you very well know Power corrupts and the absolute power the Federal employees in black robes have asserted OVER the Federal Constitution must corrupt the majority of its members absolutely.
There are two rightful remidenitys here:
1: An amendment to strip away this power.
2: Nullification to check the abuses of this power wherever we can get away with it.
The founding fathers did not give SCOTUS the power of decide the meaning of the Federal Constitution to the exclusion of the other branches and levels of Government. (that would have been insane rendering the document pointless.)
The Federal Supreme court gave itself that power, and the founding Generation firmly rejected it in practice by way of nullification.
Indeed while the court’s defenders often site Maybury v.s. Madison as the case where the court gave itself supreme authority OVER the Federal Constitution. They always neglect to mention that Maybury never got the writ he was suing for precisely because the Federal court was NOT supreme over the constitution and could not force the other branches to give it to him.
The rightful remedy here is nullification. Our states should refuses to issue marriage licenses or otherwise enforce their lawless edicts.
it is around 81% now. I suspect they are cheating like the do with everything else.
worthless poll
Still in desperate need of Freepin’ - thought I was too late - but the poll is still open:
AGREE 81%
DISAGREE 19%
Poll must have been posted over at Slate or DU.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.