Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

So Dred Scott should've remained the law of the land, Sally? You can't have it both ways! How about Citizens United? Heller?
1 posted on 06/27/2015 1:31:22 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Only leftists in sanctuary cities are entitled to nullify the law.


2 posted on 06/27/2015 1:37:07 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"These are current and former officeholders, who have taken an oath to uphold the laws of our nation"

Is article writer Sally Kohn suggesting that an oath of office is as meaningless to some Republican officeholders as it is to comrade dictator barack hussein obama?

Liberal behavior in a conservative is inexcusable!
3 posted on 06/27/2015 1:38:50 AM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Any body wanna post a picture of Axis Sally?


5 posted on 06/27/2015 1:56:59 AM PDT by Catmom (We're all gonna get the punishment only some of us deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

ROFL! The Supreme Court also took an oath to uphold the laws of the nation, but they crammed this illegal (as in blatantly unconstitutional) and immoral decision down our throats. Like we can’t read the US Constitution and understand what it means without having some judge interpret it for us—we can.

So now we’re supposed to just accept these rulings as the law of the land??? Ha! The jig is up, leftists. We conservatives are slowly learning how the game is played, and we’re going to show as much respect for the “law” as you...meaning NONE.

Oh, I’ll follow the law so long as it doesn’t force me to violate my (constitutionally enumerated) right to freely exercise my religion, but I’ll show the law and courts no respect. They are nothing more or less than black robed thugs who deserve as much ridicule and contempt as I can muster.


7 posted on 06/27/2015 2:19:31 AM PDT by CitizenUSA (Proverbs 14:34 Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a disgrace to any people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The Bible trumps what the SCOTUS thinks the Constitution says. Suck it, Sally, though I know you prefer clam


8 posted on 06/27/2015 2:26:24 AM PDT by Viennacon (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Ok, if any conservative was freaking out, there was something wrong in the first place. I had this at 90/10 in favor of gay marriage. This is the court that Obama has belittled and they have rubber stamped his entire agenda. The only time there are co- equal and separate branches of the government is when a Republican is president.
Morality cannot be legislated, especially anything other than murder one. So now that man has lost, maybe we can get back to God.
I would have freaked out if they voted against it... because that would have meant something more ominous.


9 posted on 06/27/2015 2:29:06 AM PDT by momincombatboots (Back to West by G-d Virginia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This court decision was invalid because it was highly tainted with bias in at least two Leftist justices, Kagan and Ginsberg.

A decision reached through a corrupt process shouldn’t be considered valid in the least.


12 posted on 06/27/2015 3:10:35 AM PDT by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
These are current and former officeholders, who have taken an oath to uphold the laws of our nation, literally pledging to violate those laws as interpreted by the Supreme Court....

How? The SCOTUS decision permits gay marriage. It doesn't mandate it.

Besides, Santorum and Huckabee do not hold any public office. What "oath of office" could apply? SCOTUS specifically said nobody gives up their First Amendment rights.

13 posted on 06/27/2015 3:13:36 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("In a democracy people get the leaders they deserve." - Joseph de Maistre, 1753-1821)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Well Sally I am not a Republican (see tagline) I am an American, a Christian American, a veteran American, that has served my nation and its people. I am not freaked out that the Court has ok’d homosexual marriage I am disgusted embarrassed and ashamed of the Court and what has been happening to my Country. Once one perversion becomes legitimized others will follow and soon the Country that was a beacon to the world will be just another shithole on the planet..


14 posted on 06/27/2015 3:20:23 AM PDT by 48th SPS Crusader (I am an American. Not a Republican or a Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So if the governor of Texas sticks to his promise of not violating people’s conscience or acting in defense of the frivolous and excessive lawsuits that the leftists want to throw at poorer people, that makes him bad? This woman sounds like a totalitarian.


15 posted on 06/27/2015 3:42:02 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Two questions: 1. Will the Muslims be exempt from performing queer weddings (like they are exempt from ObamaCare)?

2. Will queers be required to get an AIDS test prior to the issuing of the marriage license?

17 posted on 06/27/2015 3:53:22 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Isn't it funny that Socialists never want to share their own money?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Oh please... if the court had ruled the other way, she’d be calling on the Democrats to burn it to the ground.


20 posted on 06/27/2015 3:56:47 AM PDT by Ronin (Blackface or bolt-ons, it's the same fraud. - Norm Lenhart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If marriage equality means the type of oath irrespective of child rearing in heterosexual marriage as a central tenet, then people will argue they do not have to pay for child support and even will argue for infanticide.

This is Obama’s ultimate agenda of national suicide.

As for Sally, we do not care about her, she is already giving sex to someone who does not want to grow her gene pool, much like a sex slave is rejected accordingly. It is her who is carrying her anger on us, because we absolutely do not care what she does to get herself screwed.


21 posted on 06/27/2015 3:57:30 AM PDT by lavaroise (A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Lincoln on Dred Scott: “we think the Dred Scott decision is erroneous. We know the court that made it, has often over-ruled its own decisions, and we shall do what we can to have it to over-rule this. We offer no resistance to it.”

Has any candidate said anything other than this?

Of course, it took a great civil war to overturn Scott.


23 posted on 06/27/2015 4:05:30 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Was it then wrong for Barry to condemn Heller?


24 posted on 06/27/2015 4:05:38 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

For Leftists, it’s only settled law when they say it’s settled law.


31 posted on 06/27/2015 4:24:26 AM PDT by Flick Lives ("I'm just a stranger in a strange land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
It is wrong for public officials to defy the Supreme Court.

We must obey God rather than men.

32 posted on 06/27/2015 4:30:40 AM PDT by chajin ("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Hard to believe that a scarce 7 months ago we were on cloud 9 following the elections. Now it’s like the living dead on the right.


34 posted on 06/27/2015 4:32:20 AM PDT by paul544
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Right. The highest law is “natural law” as envisioned by the Founding Fathers, not the twisted mental spasms of sick minds like Bader-Ginsburg, Soto-Mayor, Kagan, Kennedy and Roberts. They are mental and moral defectives.


35 posted on 06/27/2015 4:34:36 AM PDT by ZULU (Roberts, Kennedy, Boehner and McConnell are Obama's Strumpets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It is wrong for public officials to defy the Supreme Court. Yet that’s what Republican presidential candidates have promised.

read Lincoln’s first inaugural Sally it’s a Republican candidates tradition ....you idiot


37 posted on 06/27/2015 4:38:13 AM PDT by tophat9000 (SCOTUS=Newspeak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson