Posted on 06/26/2015 7:53:39 AM PDT by Kaslin
I guess that was the “intent” of the 14th amendment all along, it just took a wise dyke to realize it.
Excellent question.
I weep for this country. It really was great, once. Tell your grandkids.
All across the board; the Federal government is a lawless and criminal organization. A military coup would be legal and justified.
Folks like to toy with the idea of civil disobedience. Here’s my idea that I just emailed to my County Commissioners:
Now that the Supreme Court has struck down Tennessee state law regarding marriage, it is clear that “consent of the governed” is of no consequence to the “powers that be” in Washington, D.C..
I urge to you seriously consider resisting this revolutionary decision. Continue to follow the laws of Tennessee that existed yesterday.
They are assuming that the people will meekly submit to this outrageous assault on not only American liberty, but on thousands of years of human history.
Let’s prove them wrong from the Frontier of Freedom.
REFUSE AND RESIST.
Wrong. It will be established to be superior to Freedom of Religion.
The Homofascists are gaining ground.
The time is quickly approaching when all God-fearing patriots are going to have to make a choice, are we going to idly watch the “New Rome” rot away from the inside or are we going to hit the “reset” button envisioned by the founding fathers (that would be the 2nd amendment one if you get my drift).
I never thought I would reach the point where the flag of my own country fills me with more disgust than pride, disgust at what a socialist deginerate cesspool this once great nation has become.
Criminalizing Christianity was the goal all along.
We’re gonna have a dilemma..
What form of resistance do we follow...
They are backing real Americans into a corner.
You think people in the Bible Belt, the South, really everywhere that don’t support this nonsense are going to put up with being imprisoned, thrown in jail, fined, their kids taken away, etc. For refusing to bend over? They really think we are just going to take the rape and move on?
Nope. I really think they’ve gone too far this time. They want blood in the streets. Catering to the vulgar immorality of less than .5% of the population, after upholding a law that makes it a cruel and unusual punishment for me to dish out a $2500 deductible every year, because there is no co-pay on health insurance anymore, when my scripts total over $1000 a month?
They have gone too far, and they will reap the whirlwind.
'Tis already lit.
Bullstalin, they engage in "open marriages". It's about inheritance and insurance benefits.
Marriages are down in the culture yet homomarriage that affects less than 2% of the population is supposed to be some big deal in this world.
bump
Beck is interviewing Someone from the Liberty Institute right now and he is saying 9 justices recognized religious freedom rights.
(Just who do we think we are? It can be tempting for judges to confuse our own preferences with the requirements of the law. But as this Court has been reminded throughout our history, the Constitution is made for people of fundamentally differing views, Roberts dissented)
Roberts has major self-awareness issues. Everything he wonderfully said in his dissent could be applied to his opinion for Obamacare subsidies. In that decision he and the other 5 liberals pretty much torched the Constitution, so he could never blame anyone else for the death of that document, or the rule of law in this land. His hypocrisy is breathtaking.
Okay, now age of marriages varies by the states. Does that mean a 17 year old can marry a 30 year old? What is pedophilia nowadays?
I believe that is a completely different issue and has noting to do with same sex marriage aka fags marrying each other
Abortion and now Gay Marriage.
God has a lot of restraint.
what did Scalia and Thomas write?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.