Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We Have Officially Reached Peak Leftism - progressive panic attack begins as Obama era wanes
National Review ^ | June 24, 2015 | Kevin D. Williamson

Posted on 06/24/2015 3:16:36 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

If it seems to you that the Left has, collectively, lost its damned mind as the curtain rises on the last act of the Obama administration, you are not imagining things. Barack Obama has been extraordinarily successful in his desire to — what was that phrase? — fundamentally transform the country, but the metamorphosis is nonetheless a good deal less than his congregation wanted and expected. We may have gone from being up to our knees in welfare-statism to being up to our hips in it, and from having a bushel of banana-republic corruption and incompetence to having a bushel and a peck of it, but the United States of America remains, to the Left’s dismay, plainly recognizable as herself beneath the muck.

Ergo, madness and rage.

We have seen an extraordinary outburst of genuine extremism — and genuine authoritarianism — in the past several months, and it will no doubt grow more intense as we approach the constitutional dethroning of the mock messiah to whom our progressive friends literally sang hymns of praise and swore oaths of allegiance. (“I pledge to be a servant to our president” — recall all that sieg heil creepiness.) There is an unmistakable stink of desperation about this, as though the Left intuits what the Right dares not hope: that the coming few months may in fact see progressivism’s cultural high-water mark for this generation.

If there is desperation, it probably is because the Left is starting to suspect that the permanent Democratic majority it keeps promising itself may yet fail to materialize. The Democrats won two resounding White House victories but can hardly win a majority in a state legislature (seven out of ten today are Republican-controlled) or a governorship (the Democrats are down to 18) to save their lives, while Republicans are holding their strongest position in Congress since the days of Herbert Hoover. The Democrats have calculated that their best bet in 2016 is Hillary Rodham Clinton, that tragic bag of appetites who couldn’t close the deal in the primary last time around. “Vote for me, I’m a lady” isn’t what they thought it was: Wendy Davis, running for governor of Texas, made all the proper ceremonial incantations and appeared in heroic postures on all the right magazine covers, but finished in the 30s on Election Day. With young people trending pro-life, that old black magic ain’t what it used to be.

For the Left, it feels like time is running out. So it isn’t sufficient that same-sex marriages be legalized; bakers and florists must be locked in prison if they decline to participate in a gay couple’s ceremony. It isn’t sufficient that those wishing to undergo sex-change surgery be permitted to go their own way; the public must pay for it, and if Bruce Jenner is still “Bruce” to you, you must be driven from polite society. It isn’t enough that the Left dominate the media and pop culture; any attempt to compete with it must be criminalized in the name of “getting big money out of politics.” Not the New York Times’s money, or Hollywood’s money, or the CEO of Goldman Sachs’s money — just the wrong sort of people’s money. Every major Democratic presidential candidate and every Democratic senator is on record supporting the repeal of the First Amendment’s free-speech protections — i.e., carving the heart out of the Bill of Rights — to clear the way for putting all public debate under political discipline.

Like it or not, you will be shackled to hope and change.

The hysterical shrieking about the fictitious rape epidemic on college campuses, the attempts to fan the unhappy events in Ferguson and Baltimore into a national racial conflagration, the silly and shallow “inequality” talk — these are signs of progressivism in decadence.

So is the brouhaha over the Confederate flag in South Carolina in the wake of the horrific massacre at Emanuel AME Church. For about 30 seconds, the political ghouls of the Left were looking to pick another gun-control fight, swooping in, in their habitually indecent fashion, before the bodies had even grown cold. But that turned out to be a dead end, since the killer acquired his gun after passing precisely the sort of background check that the Left generally hawks after a high-profile crime, regardless of whether it is relevant to the crime. We might have spent some time thinking about whether law enforcement was too lax in the matter of the murderer’s earlier encounters with them — the South Carolina killer had a drug arrest on his record but was able to buy a gun because he had been charged only with a misdemeanor. But the Left isn’t in any mood to talk about whether the cops aren’t being hard-assed enough. So, instead, we had a fight over a completely unrelated issue: the Confederate flag flying at the state capitol in Columbia.

You have to credit the Left: Its strategy is deft. If you can make enough noise that sounds approximately like a moral crisis, then you can in effect create a moral crisis. Never mind that the underlying argument — “Something bad has happened to somebody else, and so you must give us something we want!” — is entirely specious; it is effective. In the wake of the financial crisis, we got all manner of “reform,” from student-lending practices to the mandates of Elizabeth Warren’s new pet bureaucracy, involving things that had nothing at all to do with the financial crisis. Democrats argued that decency compelled us to pass a tax increase in the wake of the crisis, though tax rates had nothing to do with it. A crisis is a crisis is a crisis, and if a meteor hits Ypsilanti tomorrow you can be sure that Debbie Stabenow will be calling for a $15 national minimum wage because of the plight of meteor victims.

I bear no brief for the peckerwood-trash cultural tendencies that led Fritz Hollings, then governor, and the rest of the loyal Democrats who ran segregation-era South Carolina to hoist the Confederate flag in 1962. My sympathies are more with John Brown than with John Calhoun. Yet Lost Cause romanticism was very much in fashion for a moment, and not only among Confederate revanchists; Joan Baez, no redneck she, made a great deal of money with her recording of “The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down” in 1971. About every third Western of the era had as its hero a conflicted Confederate veteran, his wounded honor and stoicism in defeat compelling him to roam westward in search of a new beginning. That story lives on into our own time: Who are Mal Reynolds and the Browncoats if not another remnant of the Lost Cause relocated from Virginia to the frontier in space?

Of course the Confederate flag is a symbol of Southern racism. It is a good many other things, too, none of which was the cause of the massacre at Emanuel AME. It is strange and ironic that adherents of the Democratic party — which was, for about 140 years, not only the South’s but the world’s leading white-supremacist organization — should work themselves up over one flag, raised by their fellow partisans, at this late a date; but, well, welcome to the party. Yet Democratic concern about racist totems is selective: The Democrats are not going to change the name of their party, cancel the annual Jefferson-Jackson dinner, or stop naming things after Robert Byrd, senator and Exalted Cyclops of the Ku Klux Klan. Hillary Clinton is not going to be made to answer for her participation in a political campaign that featured Confederate-flag imagery.

The Confederate flag, and other rebel iconography, is a marker of Southern distinctiveness, which, like American distinctiveness, is inextricably bound up with the enslavement and oppression of black people. But only the South is irredeemable in the Left’s view, and it has been so only since about 1994, when it went Republican. Which is to say, the Confederate flag is an emblem of regional distinctiveness disapproved of by 21st-century Democrats. Their reinvigorated concern is awfully nice: When the South actually was a segregationist backwater that African-Americans were fleeing by the million — when Democrats were running the show — they were ho-hum. Today the South is an economic powerhouse, dominated by Republicans, and attracting new African-American residents by the thousands. And so the Left and its creature, the Democratic party, insist that Southern identity as such must be anathematized. The horrific crime that shocked the nation notwithstanding, black life in Charleston remains very different, in attractive ways, from black life in such Left-dominated horror shows as Cleveland and Detroit, and the state’s governor is, in the parlance of identity politics, a woman of color — but she is a Republican, too, and therefore there must be shrieking, rending of garments, and gnashing of teeth.

This is a fraud, and some scales are starting to fall from some eyes. Americans believe broadly in sexual equality, but only a vanishing minority of us describe ourselves as “feminists.” “Social-justice warrior” is a term of derision. The Bernie Sanders movement, like the draft-Warren movement of which it is an offshoot, is rooted in disgust at the opportunistic politics of the Clinton claque. Young people who have heard all their lives that the Republican party and the conservative movement are for old white men — young people who may be not be quite old enough to remember Democrats’ boasting of their “double-Bubba” ticket in 1992, pairing the protégé of one Southern segregationist with the son of another — see before them Nikki Haley, Bobby Jindal, Susana Martinez, Carly Fiorina, Tim Scott, Mia Love, Marco Rubio, Ben Carson, Elise Stefanik. None of those men and women is bawling about “microaggressions” or dreaming up new sexless pronouns. None belongs to the party that hoisted Dixie over the capitol in South Carolina either. Governor Haley may be sensitive to the history of her state, but she is a member of the party of Lincoln with family roots in Punjab — it isn’t her flag.

What’s going to happen between now and November 8 of next year will be a political campaign on one side of the aisle only. On the other side, it’s going to be something between a temper tantrum and a panic attack. That’s excellent news if you’re Ted Cruz, Scott Walker, Marco Rubio, or Carly Fiorina. It’s less good news if you live in Baltimore or Philadelphia.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democraticparty; progressives; sjw; socialjustice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: buckalfa

>>>...why is Charleston not burning?<<<

I was thinking the same thing.... and here’s my thoughts.

The protests and uproar around Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, Eric Garner, and the others were premised on the (false) belief that there’s a huge but silent reservoir of white racism out there, killing black men. It was easy to take part in the belief because it was invisible, so a person could fill in the blanks with their own fears and imagination.

(As an aside, I’m a high school English teacher, and every time we read “The Crucible” I teach a unit on mass hysteria. During the Ferguson riots, a former student Facebooked me to say, “Thanks for teaching me about mass hysteria, that’s what is happening down there.”)

In Charleston, black people could immediately see the outpouring of support for those murdered and hear the disgust in the voices of every white person they ran into. The crowds afterwards at the church and in the community were multiracial and multiethnic. Even the most racist black person would be hard-pressed to see a racist tide rolling over their community. (I imagine some folks thinking, “Well, maybe most white people are racist, but not OUR white folks.”)

So the left remains with flags and gun control, and their other ranting stupidity about racism being in the American DNA and no such massacres happening elsewhere are weak stuff. There’s no question that everyone is mourns the death of the people in that church. There’s grief, but not anger against an imagined enemy. No riot.


41 posted on 06/24/2015 12:07:58 PM PDT by redpoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: redpoll

were there checkpoints on I 95 and I 26 to divert inbound buses of riff raff riot starters?


42 posted on 06/24/2015 12:10:13 PM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... No peace? then no peace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

So the reader is then faces with a choice. Agree with the inserted propaganda or discount most of what he says.

Come now...the choice you specify is not the only thing available to the reader...or are you honestly saying that a single line in a composition that strikes a sour note with you as the reader by itself invalidates the entirety of the rest of the work...?

You seem to be giving readers low grades for discernment...


43 posted on 06/24/2015 1:26:44 PM PDT by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade

Study after study on both sides of the aisle shows the average American reader isn’t even close to reading at the level of a High School senior. So you tell me how much credit they deserve.

If you don’t believe what I’m telling you here or in my original comment, I invite you to read up on propaganda techniques and studies in reading level. You will find my comments based on objective, not subjective reality.


44 posted on 06/24/2015 2:44:04 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
But it is. First of all, that rebel battle flag is not the flag of the confederacy, but it was chosen by Fritz Hollings to fly over the SC state capitol *dome* in the year ****1961**** as a gesture of defiance against integration.

There are other flags of the confederacy that are not so inflammatory. The Repubs in SC have wanted to get that flag off the dome, and they did fifteen years ago, and the dead parson of the Methodist church voted with the Republican in compromise to put the flag in a little corner with a memorial to civil war dead.

I know there are those who resent this canard and the forced takedown of the flag, but it is a Democrat relic, racist Democrats like Byrd and Hollings, and we should not defend it

45 posted on 06/24/2015 4:30:42 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

So the 1A only protects non offensive speech. Boy wouldn’t the founders be surprised.

I’m not southern. I’m as far north a Yankee as one can get by birth. I have no connection with the flag. I do have a connection with free speech. And that freedom means protecting what SOME view as racist speechwhether it is racist as they think or whether they are simply bandwagoning. Because the alternative is the mob freakout when they get you your sacred cow.


46 posted on 06/24/2015 4:42:47 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
Nothing in the 1A prevents legislators voting for, and executives managing, the removal of a symbol from public property.

Most Civil War re-enactors, who are interestingly not registering into this quarrel, have different flags on their bumper stickers. Since most people are manifestly ignorant of Civil War history, they don't even know what they're looking at.

47 posted on 06/24/2015 4:48:55 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Honestly, I think they’re not even close to their limit. It will get far worse. The Dog Eat Dog bill will look tame in comparison. They know no shame, and no limits. They are not constrained by reason or logic. They have no reason whatsoever in their conscience to stop at any point, because they fervently, religiously, zealously believe, above all else, that their ideas are more important than even millions of lives. It is a mistake to think (like I did before Obama won) that there was no way that the nation would allow them to go beyond reasonable limits.


48 posted on 06/24/2015 4:52:39 PM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson