My bride has Dem/Catholic family that ask her that often.
They are all pro gay, pro infanticide, and hate me for be pro life.
She has stopped attending mass.
Author observes the differences between Pope John Paul II and Pope Francis:
* Whereas John Paul liked to talk about the Republican-friendly concept of subsidiarity (having the most local possible public authority handle the administration of social services and welfare), Francis is quite comfortable endorsing state action to advance the common good and address significant social and economic problems.
* Whereas John Paul loudly denounced the “culture of death” (abortion, euthanasia) and Benedict railed against an incipient “dictatorship of relativism,” , Francis speaks more quietly and in a more nuanced way about social issues, while leading with issues on which the Catholic Church and the Republican Party have always been farthest apart — poverty, inequality, the damage wrought by free-market ideology, and now climate change and related environmental concerns.
If Francis is the Peter role in this church, who will take the Paul role to tell him to stop viewing and addressing the world through his old Communistic schooling?
Now you can be a gay polygamist abortionist pediophile Democrat and you still don’t get attacked as much as a heart felt believer of the Catholic Church when you are a Republican.
There is a fifth column infiltrating all of our institutions: family, church, school, etc.. This evil is very persistent.
The liberals are trying to halt the movement of Catholics into the Republican side of the aisle. I do not think it will work.
The encyclical that PF just released is getting lauds from liberals because of his environmental statements - but if and when (will the happen?) they read the entire encyclical, they will be amazed at PF’s emphatic statements regarding the issues of abortion, sexual immorality, gender-bending nonsense, and gay marriage.
He is still a Catholic after all, and still follows the time-honored tenets of the church regarding personal behavior in our sexual lives. Marriage is still between a man and a woman, and he states quite clearly that the differences between men and women ought to be celebrated. Femininity and masculinity are complementary, he says.
It was a bad decision for the Vatican to get involved in the issue of AGW. Despite what its adherents say, it is not settled science. Being pro-environment does not mean a person is anti-mining, for dirty water and air, etc.
Francis seems to forget that God is in control, not man.
Or maybe he never knew it.
What does matter is an understanding of this encyclical. The parts I have read make it nothing but an exceptionally long winded editorial. By zero means is it an ex cathedra statement in support of or altering any theological tenet.
I wonder if every translation of what I hear on pronouncements on Francis' utterings and mutterings have been literal, true and in context. If they have been the guy is more than an educated simpleton. If they are, Pope Francis is a nit wit.
The parts of this encyclical I have read make it a semi serious news piece or a script for Saturday Night Live.
Regardless, Pope Francis has said zip since he has moved to Rome that anyone needs to follow as gospel. He has said much, apparently, that folks capable of completing thoughts must argue against and oppose as moral beings.
I think Catholic Republicans AND Republican Catholics can be moral beings.
1. From what I’ve encountered on FR, my fellow Catholic FReepers and I are not Republicans; however, we are good Catholics and good conservatives.
2. To demonstrate how silly this article is: Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and Jeremiah Wright are Protestant. Can one be a good Protestant and a good conservative?
Consider the positive items in Pope Francis encyclical.
These are 11 good things in the encyclical… which is why you won’t hear about them in the MSM.
Each point of the following is explained in the piece with quotes gleaned directly from the encyclical. Here are the bullet points:
The official version of Pope Francis’ eco-encyclical Laudato Si was released this morning. While much of the media focus will be on the sections devoted to climate change and global warming, here are eleven things from the encyclical you probably won’t see in the headlines.
(1) Creation has a Creator, and is more than just “nature-plus-evolution”:
(2) Human ecology means recognizing and valuing the difference between masculinity and femininity:
(3) Jesus sanctifies human work:
(4) Look up from your phones and encounter each other:
(5) Save the baby humans:
(6) Helping the poor requires more than just handouts:
(7) Overpopulation is not the problem:
(8) True ecology requires true anthropology and respect for human dignity:
(9) Real change requires a change in culture, not just politics:
(10) The Church does not presume to settle scientific questions, and we need an honest and open debate:
(11) Stop with the cynicism, secularism and immorality:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3301756/posts
PFL
With the leftward movement of the church and the GOP, I don’t identify with either. But Damon Linker is not to be taken seriously.
A good Catholic should pray for the Pope and speak out against his many heresies.
A good Republican should do the same for his party leaders.
Both institutions have been completely corrupted to the point of being overthrown, so the question posed is basically unanswerable.
Depends. If one defines Catholicism and Republicanism as supporting leftist positions, which they increasingly do, then sure. Same people afterall. But if one wants to be a good christian, they sorta can’t back a liberal. People backing liberals, R or D or other, simply arent christian. They are liberals.
Yes, a Republican can be a good Catholic. It’s actually a stupid question. If people had a clue, they would realize much of what the pope espouses is merely prudential opinion and is not binding on any Catholic.
Read the above.
Comment #2:
I really don't think that a Good Catholic can be a Good Republican.
I also don't think that a Good Conservative can be a Good Republican.
I do think that the only viable point of view for a Good Catholic is to be a Good Conservative. But Conservative and Republican are not synonymous and, more and more, are becoming mutually exclusive.
How can any American politician that swears to defend the U.S. Constitution, pay heed, follow, agree with, and make laws issuing from, ANYTHING that a man in another country speaks, evokes, writes, issues, decrees, from a supposed seat of some kind of ethereal authority?
It’s insane.
When we ‘divorced’ ourselves from England, we ‘divorced’ ourselves from any European religious influence, as a nation.
There are dozens of other factors, seen only by the Savior, that determine that holy question. Merely holding certain political opinions is likely very low on that list.
The problem with offering stupid solutions based on a false assumption in some semi theological proclamation by a current leader of Catholics which would hurt the very people you wish to help. Such as urging placing a prohibitively high price on fossil fuels to discourage their use because it will save the world from “carbon warming”. Demeans the value of the document and the balance of moral assertions made in it.
Furthurmore it allows critics such as Damon Linker expressing left wing views in the radical anti-religion publication “The Week” to resurrect the Papacy question. Questioning of members of that large group where their loyalty lies. Which is to core beliefs centered around a ritual known as The Mass and not to any Pope who should have chosen the name (sun revolves around the earth) Urban not Francis.