Posted on 05/26/2015 2:55:52 PM PDT by Theoria
The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to hear a case that will answer a long-contested question about a bedrock principle of the American political system: the meaning of “one person one vote.”
The court has never resolved whether that means that voting districts should have the same number of people, or the same number of eligible voters. The difference matters in places with large numbers of people who cannot vote legally, including immigrants who are here legally but are not citizens; unauthorized immigrants; children; and prisoners.
The new case, Evenwel v. Abbott, No. 14-940, is a challenge to voting districts for the Texas Senate brought by two voters, Sue Evenwel and Edward Pfenninger. They are represented by the Project on Fair Representation, the small conservative advocacy group that has mounted earlier challenges to affirmative action and to a central part of the Voting Rights Act.
“There are voters or potential voters in Texas whose Senate votes are worth approximately one and one-half times that of appellants,” the challengers’ brief said.
In a statement issued after the Supreme Court accepted their case, Ms. Evenwel and Mr. Pfenninger said they “hoped that the outcome of our lawsuit will compel Texas to equalize the number of eligible voters in each district.”
A 1964 Supreme Court decision, Reynolds v. Sims, ruled that voting districts must contain very close to the same number of people. But the court did not say which people count.
Almost all state and local governments draw districts based on total population. If people who were ineligible to vote were evenly distributed, the difference between counting all people or counting only eligible voters would not matter. But demographic patterns vary widely.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
They will tear it apart one smooth-sounding argument at a time.
left redefining words again...
If you live in an urban district that is disproportionately populated with illegal aliens then logic dictates that it is YOU whose vote is disproportionate and not the white suburbanite who lives in a district of mostly white suburbanites.
This is the opposite of what these mathematically challenged people are arguing.
Not being law-minded, I have no idea what this means.
LIKE; the left is progressive.. when it’s really regressive..
Corp.s are a person/individual. Can they vote?
hell, i will go farther than this..
why do people who do not pay property taxes get to vote on property tax increases???
why do you think every municipality has minimum high density housing requirements??
so apartment dwellers and condo owners can out vote the property owners...
property taxes are a crime...
since we allow US citizens to vote although they are living abroad, it would seem to be discriminatory not to allow non-citizens how are living abroad not to vote.
It isn’t rocket science. It means: Each citizen may cast one vote.
That phrase is not a bedrock of anything. "One man, one vote," as the liberals used to call it in the 1960s, is an anti-Federalist bit of Communist clap-trap, another attempt to bypass the words of the Constitution to push toward gerrymandered, "democratic" elections. This idea began as yet more election-tinkering to make vote fraud in favor of Democrats easier.
The Founders’ infamous argument over counting slaves for purposes of representation should determine this issue.
Only citizens count.
No doubt, the ‘progressives’ will try to get 3/5 of the illegals counted...
I must have missed something. Does the Constitution use the expression “one man one vote”?
I agree about property tax. Now THAT should be unconstitutional. Some pay and some don’t?
Art 1, Sec 2: Enumeration ...every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct.
Districts are based on the census. The census is based on the above “they shall by Law direct”
So are fake conservatives now asking the Court to pass another law?
ONE BALLOT PER REGISTERED VOTER!
The left will try anything and in the meantime the Feds ruled 2-1 against Obama. It is time to impeach him.
Without voter fraud, the rats have nothing.....
Fixed it.
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.